| Literature DB >> 31024697 |
Concetta Maria Messina1, Gioacchino Bono2, Rosaria Arena1, Mariano Randazzo3, Maria Morghese1,3, Simona Manuguerra1,3, Laura La Barbera3, Fatih Ozogul4, Saloua Sadok5, Andrea Santulli1,3.
Abstract
This study aimed to produce new value-added products from dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus) as fillets when using cold smoking combined with natural antioxidants, obtained from Halocnemum strobilaceum a plant belonging to halophytes. The fillet treatments were controlled (untreated), immersed in standard brine (STD), treated with NaCI and antioxidant before freezing (Aox-pre) and treated with NaCl and antioxidant after thawing (Aox-post). The quality of dolphinfish fillets was assessed using sensory, biochemical, microbiological, and technological parameters. Treating fillets with antioxidants before freezing and cold smoking (Aox-pre) enhanced significantly the shelf life, as well as improved the biochemical, microbiological, and sensory aspects of the product. Aox-pre fillets had the lowest peroxide values (PV) and malondialdehyde (MDA) content, demonstrating that the immediate treatment of fillets with the polyphenols protected lipids from peroxidation. The smoking process, together with antioxidant treatment, significantly reduced microbial counts after 15 days of storage, compared to the control. Overall, combining antioxidant treatments with cold smoking has a positive effect on the quality of Aox-pre fillets with respect to both sensory components and biochemical parameters associated with shelf life. Consequently, Aox-pre treatment enhances the marketability of this species, promoting local and seasonal products, contributing to costal fisheries sustainability.Entities:
Keywords: Coryphaena hippurus; antioxidants; cold smoking; dolphinfish; shelf life
Year: 2019 PMID: 31024697 PMCID: PMC6475737 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.946
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Figure 1Flowchart of the experimental design
Figure 2Physical–chemical parameters of cold‐smoked C. hippurus fillets during 30 days of storage; STD: immersed in standard brine; Aox‐pre: treated with NaCl solution + antioxidant before freezing; Aox‐post: treated with NaCl solution + antioxidants after thawing. (a): ΔE; (b): Water holding capacity (WHC); (c): pH
Parameters related to texture—Young Modulus (N/mm2) and Hardness (N)—measured in cold‐smoked C. hippurus fillets during the 30 days of storage
| T0 | T1 | T6 | T15 | T21 | T30 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Young modulus (N/mm2) | STD | 0.17 ± 0.07 | 0.23 ± 0.05 | 0.23 ± 0.06 | 0.29 ± 0.05 | 0.23 ± 0.07 | 0.24 ± 0.08 |
| Aox‐pre | 0.17 ± 0.07 | 0.23 ± 0.07 | 0.24 ± 0.04 | 0.28 ± 0.09 | 0.20 ± 0.09 | 0.20 ± 0.05 | |
| Aox‐post | 0.17 ± 0.07a | 0.18 ± 0.08a | 0.27 ± 0.07ab | 0.32 ± 0.07b | 0.25 ± 0.06ab | 0.23 ± 0.05ab | |
| Hardness (N) | STD | 5.19 ± 1.95a | 8.43 ± 1.97ab | 9.96 ± 2.24ab | 13.00 ± 2.05b | 8.39 ± 3.85ab | 9.65 ± 1.96ab |
| Aox‐pre | 5.19 ± 1.95a | 6.81 ± 3.00a | 9.19 ± 3.82ab | 13.62 ± 6.21b | 7.34 ± 3.76ab | 8.30 ± 2.91ab | |
| Aox‐post | 5.19 ± 1.95a | 6.68 ± 2.93a | 9.94 ± 2.46ab | 12.98 ± 3.35b | 8.98 ± 2.58ab | 11.12 ± 3.28ab |
Data within a row that have different superscript letters are statistically different (p < 0.05). Each value represents the mean of three independent determinations.
Aox‐post: treated with NaCl solution + antioxidant after thawing; Aox‐pre: treated with NaCl solution + antioxidants before freezing; STD: immersed in standard brine.
Proximate composition (g/100 g wet weight) and polyphenol content (mg GAE/g) of C. hippurus fillets
| CO | STD | Aox‐pre | Aox‐post | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lipid | 2.15 ± 0.47 | 2.18 ± 0.65 | 1.99 ± 0.20 | 2.01 ± 0.08 |
| Moisture | 76.98 ± 1.03 | 73.46 ± 0.59 | 74.92 ± 0.39 | 73.35 ± 0.58 |
| Protein | 18.55 ± 0.72 | 18.27 ± 0.86 | 18.37 ± 0.42 | 18.47 ± 1.07 |
| Ash | 1.31 ± 0.08 | 4.97 ± 0.82 | 4.00 ± 0.30 | 4.49 ± 0.37 |
| mg GAE/g muscle | 0.22 ± 0.02a | 0.28 ± 0.06a | 0.52 ± 0.05b | 0.28 ± 0.05b |
Data within a row that have different superscript letters are statistically different (p < 0.05). Each value represents the mean of three independent determinations.
Aox‐post: treated with NaCl solution + antioxidant after thawing; Aox‐pre: treated with NaCl solution + antioxidants before freezing; CO: untreated group; STD: immersed in standard brine.
Fatty acids classes (g/100 g) in C. hippurus fillets
| CO | STD | Aox‐pre | Aox‐post | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saturated | 30.76 ± 0.96 | 31.07 ± 1.07 | 30.39 ± 0.81 | 30.20 ± 1.64 |
| Monounsaturated | 14.08 ± 1.03 | 13.66 ± 1.42 | 14.31 ± 0.43 | 13.22 ± 0.62 |
| Tot n‐3 | 50.25 ± 1.66 | 51.91 ± 2.15 | 51.27 ± 0.96 | 52.49 ± 2.06 |
| Tot n‐6 | 2.42 ± 0.20 | 2.10 ± 0.99 | 2.63 ± 0.22 | 2.86 ± 0.15 |
| DHA | 43.31 ± 1.82 | 45.16 ± 2.22 | 45.38 ± 1.84 | 43.88 ± 1.00 |
| DHA/EPA | 8.58 ± 0.60 | 9.52 ± 0.53 | 8.98 ± 0.42 | 9.24 ± 0.34 |
Each value represents the mean of three independent determinations.
Aox‐post: treated with NaCl solution + antioxidant after thawing; Aox‐pre: treated with NaCl solution + antioxidants before freezing; CO: untreated group; STD: immersed in standard brine.
Figure 3Biochemical parameters associated to the shelf life of cold‐smoked C. hippurus fillets during 30 days of storage: STD: immersed in standard brine; Aox‐pre: treated with NaCl solution + antioxidants before freezing; Aox‐post: treated with NaCl solution + antioxidant after thawing. (a): peroxide values (mEq/kg); (b): TBARS (mg MDA/kg); (c): TVBN (mg/100 g). Each point represents the mean of three independent determinations
Figure 4Microbiological parameters associated to shelf life of cold‐smoked C. hippurus fillets during 30 days of storage: STD: immersed in a standard brine; Aox‐pre: treated with NaCl solution + antioxidants before freezing; Aox‐post: treated with NaCl solution + antioxidant after thawing. (a): mesophilic (37°C); (b): psychrophilic (6°C). Each point represents the mean of three independent determinations
Figure 5Sensory analysis of cold‐smoked C. hippurus fillets during 30 days of storage. The results of each attribute are expressed as the percentage of the panelists that evaluated them as agreeable, neutral, and disagreeable. (a): STD agreeable; (b): Aox‐pre agreeable; (c): Aox‐post agreeable; (d): STD neutral; (e): Aox‐pre neutral; (f): Aox‐post neutral; (g): STD disagreeable; (h): Aox‐pre disagreeable; (i): Aox‐post disagreeable. Each point represents the mean of three independent determinations