Literature DB >> 31024593

Corrigendum: Root Exudation of Primary Metabolites: Mechanisms and Their Roles in Plant Responses to Environmental Stimuli.

Alberto Canarini1, Christina Kaiser1, Andrew Merchant2, Andreas Richter1, Wolfgang Wanek1.   

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00157.].

Keywords:  mycorrhiza; nutrient sensing; priming effect; root architecture; root exudates; soil micro-organisms

Year:  2019        PMID: 31024593      PMCID: PMC6465637          DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Plant Sci        ISSN: 1664-462X            Impact factor:   5.753


In the original article, there was a mistake in Figure 1 as published. The group of cells highlighted in red (in the upper part of the figure) are named “meristem,” while it should more specifically refer to the “quiescent center.” The corrected Figure 1 appears below.
Figure 1

Root structure and areas of root exudation. The upper figure represents the longitudinal section of a root. Tissues are indicated in different colors for the different zones of the root (listed at the bottom). The two circles focus on two distinct zones, a differentiated vs. an undifferentiated area, to show the presence of a Casparian strip and low abundance of plasmodesmata in the differentiated area (left circle), and the presence of funnel plasmodesmata in the undifferentiated area (right circle). The square represents a cross section close to the meristematic area where root exudation is the highest. The lower figures represent a schematic representation of solute movement sites from phloem unloading to the soil environment, either in the differentiation zone (A) or in the undifferentiated root tip (B). (A) Solutes move both through the symplastic and apoplastic pathways, but then they are re-uptaken into the cytoplasm as the Casparian strip limits the apoplastic pathway. Only the cortex and epidermis are responsible for the flux of metabolites into the apoplast and consecutively into the soil (root exudation). Cortex and epidermis represents the major control point for root exudation. (B) At the phloem unloading site, both symplastic and apoplastic pathways are used. Because of the lack of a Casparian strip solutes can move out of the root (root exudation) through both the apoplastic and the symplastic pathway.

Root structure and areas of root exudation. The upper figure represents the longitudinal section of a root. Tissues are indicated in different colors for the different zones of the root (listed at the bottom). The two circles focus on two distinct zones, a differentiated vs. an undifferentiated area, to show the presence of a Casparian strip and low abundance of plasmodesmata in the differentiated area (left circle), and the presence of funnel plasmodesmata in the undifferentiated area (right circle). The square represents a cross section close to the meristematic area where root exudation is the highest. The lower figures represent a schematic representation of solute movement sites from phloem unloading to the soil environment, either in the differentiation zone (A) or in the undifferentiated root tip (B). (A) Solutes move both through the symplastic and apoplastic pathways, but then they are re-uptaken into the cytoplasm as the Casparian strip limits the apoplastic pathway. Only the cortex and epidermis are responsible for the flux of metabolites into the apoplast and consecutively into the soil (root exudation). Cortex and epidermis represents the major control point for root exudation. (B) At the phloem unloading site, both symplastic and apoplastic pathways are used. Because of the lack of a Casparian strip solutes can move out of the root (root exudation) through both the apoplastic and the symplastic pathway. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
  3 in total

1.  Chitosan and Gold Nanoparticles Supplementation for Augmentation of Indole-3-Acetic Acid Production by Rhizospheric Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Plant Growth Enhancement.

Authors:  Jishma Panichikkal; Radhakrishnan E Krishnankutty
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Sorgoleone concentration influences mycorrhizal colonization in sorghum.

Authors:  Isabela Figueiredo de Oliveira; Maria Lúcia Ferreira Simeone; Cristiane Carvalho de Guimarães; Nathally Stefany Garcia; Robert Eugene Schaffert; Sylvia Morais de Sousa
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 3.387

Review 3.  Pinpointing secondary metabolites that shape the composition and function of the plant microbiome.

Authors:  Richard P Jacoby; Anna Koprivova; Stanislav Kopriva
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 6.992

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.