| Literature DB >> 31024503 |
José D Santos1,2, Inês Vitorino1,2, Mercedes De la Cruz3, Caridad Díaz3, Bastien Cautain3, Frederick Annang3, Guiomar Pérez-Moreno4, Ignacio Gonzalez Martinez3, Jose R Tormo3, Jesús M Martín3, Ralph Urbatzka2, Francisca M Vicente3, Olga M Lage1,2.
Abstract
In the beginning of the twenty-first century, humanity faces great challenges regarding diseases and health-related quality of life. A drastic rise in bacterial antibiotic resistance, in the number of cancer patients, in the obesity epidemics and in chronic diseases due to life expectation extension are some of these challenges. The discovery of novel therapeutics is fundamental and it may come from underexplored environments, like marine habitats, and microbial origin. Actinobacteria are well-known as treasure chests for the discovery of novel natural compounds. In this study, eighteen Actinomycetales isolated from marine sponges of three Erylus genera collected in Portuguese waters were tested for bioactivities with the main goal of isolating and characterizing the responsible bioactive metabolites. The screening comprehended antimicrobial, anti-fungal, anti-parasitic, anti-cancer and anti-obesity properties. Fermentations of the selected strains were prepared using ten different culturing media. Several bioactivities against the fungus Aspergillus fumigatus, the bacteria Staphylococcus aureus methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and the human liver cancer cell line HepG2 were obtained in small volume cultures. Screening in higher volumes showed consistent anti-fungal activity by strain Dermacoccus sp. #91-17 and Micrococcus luteus Berg02-26. Gordonia sp. Berg02-22.2 showed anti-parasitic (Trypanosoma cruzi) and anti-cancer activity against several cell lines (melanoma A2058, liver HepG2, colon HT29, breast MCF7 and pancreatic MiaPaca). For the anti-obesity assay, Microbacterium foliorum #91-29 and #91-40 induced lipid reduction on the larvae of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Dereplication of the extracts from several bacteria showed the existence of a variety of secondary metabolites, with some undiscovered molecules. This work showed that Actinomycetales are indeed good candidates for drug discovery.Entities:
Keywords: Actinomycetales; anti-cancer; anti-obesogenic; anti-parasitic; antimicrobials; marine sponges
Year: 2019 PMID: 31024503 PMCID: PMC6467163 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00727
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
List of Actinomycetales used in this study evidencing their physiological affiliation and bioactive potential.
| Strain ID | Affiliation | Secondary metabolism gene | Previous bioactivity |
|---|---|---|---|
| #91_17∗ | NRPS | CA | |
| #91_20 | N/D | NA | |
| #91_29∗ | N/D | CA | |
| #91_31∗ | N/D | CA | |
| #91_34∗ | N/D | CA | |
| #91_35∗ | PKS-I | CA; VA | |
| #91_36.1∗ | PKS-I; NRPS | CA; VA; EC | |
| #91_37∗ | N/D | CA; VA | |
| #91_40∗ | PKS-I | CA; VA | |
| #91_44 | PKS-I; NRPS | NA | |
| #91_54 | NRPS | CA, VA | |
| SM 115 | PKS-I | NA | |
| SM 116 | PKS-I | NA | |
| Berg01-119c | N/D | VA; VF | |
| Berg02-22.2∗ | PKS-I | BS | |
| Berg02-26 | N/D | NA | |
| Berg02-78∗ | PKS-I; NRPS | BS | |
| Berg02-79∗ | N/D | BS | |
Composition of the media used for liquid culture extractions.
| Reagents (g/L) | Medium | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| FPY-12 | M016 | R2A | |
| Yeast Extract | – | 1.0 | 5.0∗ 10-1 |
| Casein hydrolysate | – | – | 5.0∗ 10-1 |
| Glucose | 10 | 10 | 5.0∗ 10-1 |
| Fructose | 20 | – | – |
| Maltose | 10 | 10 | – |
| Peptone | 5 | – | 5.0∗ 10-1 |
| Amicase | 5 | – | – |
| Starch | – | 10 | 5.0∗ 10-1 |
| Soytone | – | 5.0 | – |
| Tryptone | – | 4.0 | – |
| K2HPO4 | – | 2.0∗ 10-1 | 3.0∗ 10-1 |
| NaCl | – | 2.0∗ 10-2 | – |
| KCl | – | 2.0∗ 10-5 | – |
| MgSO4.7H2O | – | 5.0∗ 10-2 | 4.0∗ 10-2 |
| KH2PO4 | – | 1.0∗ 10-1 | – |
| CaCl2.H2O | – | 5.0∗ 10-2 | – |
| C3H3NaO3 | – | – | 3.0∗ 10-1 |
| FeSO4.7H2O | 5.0∗ 10-4 | – | – |
| ZnCl2 | – | 2.0∗ 10-5 | – |
| ZnSO4.7H2O | 5.0∗ 10-4 | – | – |
| MnSO4.H2O | 1.0∗ 10-4 | 1.0∗ 10-4 | – |
| CuSO4.5H2O | 5.0∗ 10-5 | – | – |
| CoCl2.6H2O | 5.0∗ 10-5 | 2.0∗ 10-5 | – |
| SnCl2.2H2O | – | 5.0∗10-6 | – |
| H3BO3 | – | 1.0∗ 10-5 | – |
| Na2MoO4.2H2O | – | 1.2∗ 10-5 | – |
| CuSO4 | – | 1.5∗ 10-5 | – |
| FeCl3 | – | 5.8∗ 10-3 | – |
Summary of the bioactivities obtained with the Duetz extracts.
| Strain ID | Affiliation | Bioactivity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target | Medium | % inhibition or death | ||
| #91_17 | AF | CGY | 66 | |
| IN-CRY | 86 | |||
| M016 | 60 | |||
| #91_40 | HepG2 | IN-CRY | 66 | |
| Berg02-22.2 | AF | AB | 64 | |
| HepG2 | IN-CRY | 62 | ||
| Berg02-26 | AF | IN-CRY | 69 | |
| R358 | 57 | |||
| Berg02-78 | AF | AB | 51 | |
| TC | IN-CRY | 50 | ||
| Berg02-79 | MRSA | R358 | 100 | |
| HepG2 | IN-CRY | 56 | ||
Summary of the bioactivities obtained with the EPA extracts.
| Strain ID | Affiliation | Bioactivity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target | Medium | % inhibition or death | ||
| #91_17 | AF | CGY | 67 | |
| M016 | 93 | |||
| CA | CGY | 82 | ||
| M016 | 100 | |||
| Berg02-22.2 | TC | AB | 91 | |
| A2058 | AB | 71 | ||
| HepG2 | AB | 88 | ||
| HT29 | AB | 78 | ||
| MCF7 | AB | 82 | ||
| MIAPaCa-2 | AB | 72 | ||
| Berg02-26 | AF | IN-CRY | 58 | |
| CA | IN-CRY | 75 | ||
FIGURE 1Zebrafish larvae under brightfield (A,C,E,G) and fluorescence microscopy (B,D,F,H). In (A,B) larvae were exposed only to DMSO, showing a normal lipid buildup, situated mostly among the lower abdomen; in (C,D) larvae were exposed to resveratrol, showing a decrease of neutral lipid staining; in (E,F) larvae were exposed to extract from strain #91–40; in (G,H) larvae were exposed to extract from strain #91-17. These larvae showed a visible decrease and increase in fluorescence when compared to the DMSO treated larvae, respectively. This implies that the extract altered the accumulation of lipids in treated larvae.
FIGURE 2Percentage of fluorescent staining of neutral lipids in zebrafish larvae. Values are presented as mean fluorescence intensity relative to the DMSO group in a box-whisker plot. Statistical differences are represented as asterisks, ∗∗p < 0.01.
Dereplication of the selected active extracts.
| Strain ID | Culture medium | Putatively detected components |
|---|---|---|
| #91_17 | CGY | Cyclo(prolyltyrosyl), cyclo([iso]leucylprolyl), cyclo(phenylalanylprolyl), cyclo(prolylvalyl), 1 |
| #91_17 | M016 | Cyclo(prolyltyrosyl), cyclo([iso]leucylprolyl), cyclo(phenylalanylprolyl), cyclo(prolylvalyl), 1 |
| Berg02-22.2 | AB | Cyclo([iso]leucylprolyl), Cyclo(phenylalanylprolyl), C52H74N10O11, C35H28N6O8, C28H41N5O10, Gly-Pro-Phe-Pro-Ile peptide, nocardichelin A, nocardichelin B and an undescribed nocardichelin (C42H69N5O8). |
| Berg02-26 | IN-CRY | Cyclo([iso]leucylprolyl), cyclo(prolyltyrosyl) C22H21N3O3 and C13H14N2O3 (coincidence with caerulomycin G.) |
FIGURE 3UV and mass spectra of (A) nocardichelin A and (B) component C42H69N5O8 detected in the extract from the AB medium of strain Berg02-22.2. The comparison of the spectra shows the similarities between the two components which suggest that the component C42H69N5O8 is a new nocardichelin.
Summarized results from the work.
| Strain | Afiliation | Lipid assay activity | Bioctive Duetz extracts | Bioctive EPA extracts | Detected components in bioactive EPA extracts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extract | Bioactivity | Extract | Bioactivity | ||||
| #91_17 | -43% | CGY | AF | CGY | AF; CA | Cyclo(prolyltyrosyl), cyclo([iso]leucylprolyl), cyclo(phenylalanylprolyl), cyclo(prolylvalyl), 1H-Indole-3-acetic acid, C41H60N2O9 and C43H64N2O9 | |
| M016 | M016 | AF; CA | Cyclo(prolyltyrosyl), cyclo([iso]leucylprolyl), cyclo(phenylalanylprolyl), cyclo(prolylvalyl), 1H-Indole-3-acetic acid, C22H38N4O5 and C22H21N3O3 | ||||
| Berg02-22.2 | NA | AB | AF | AB | TC | Cyclo([iso]leucylprolyl), cyclo(phenylalanylprolyl), C52H74N10O11, C35H28N6O8, C28H41N5O10, the peptide Gly-Pro-Phe-Pro-Ile, nocardichelin A, nocardichelin B and C42H69N5O8 | |
| A2058 | |||||||
| HepG2 | |||||||
| IN-CRY | HepG2 | HT29 | |||||
| MCF7 | |||||||
| MIAPaCa-2 | |||||||
| Berg02-78 | NA | AB | AF | N/T | N/T | ||
| IN-CRY | TC | ||||||
| #91_29 | 47% | NA | NA | N/T | |||
| #91_40 | 50% | IN-CRY | HepG2 | N/T | N/T | ||
| Berg02-79 | NA | R358 | MRSA | N/T | N/T | ||
| IN-CRY | HepG2 | ||||||
| Berg02-26 | NA | IN-CRY | AF | IN-CRY | AF | Cyclo([iso]leucylprolyl), cyclo(prolyltyrosyl), C22H21N3O3 and C13H14N2O3 | |
| R358 | CA | ||||||