| Literature DB >> 31024233 |
Xun Sun1,2, Fang Liu1,2, Qingyao Liu1,2, Yongkang Gai1,2, Weiwei Ruan1,2, Dilani Neranjana Wimalarathne1,2, Fan Hu1,2, Xubo Tan1,2, Xiaoli Lan1,2.
Abstract
Dopamine transporter (DAT) and glucose metabolism imaging have been applied in the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD). We explored the possibility of evaluating for PD with NeuroQ software by analyzing 11C-2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-fluorophenyl) tropane (11C-CFT) and 18F-FDG PET/CT. We retrospectively analyzed brain 11C-CFT and 18F-FDG PET/CT of 38 patients with parkinsonism, including 20 with PD, 10 with multiple system atrophy (MSA) and 8 with essential tremor (ET), and compared them with the PET/CT of 11 normal healthy controls (NC). PD patients were divided into mild and moderate-severe grade according to the Hoehn-Yahr (H&Y) scale. The 11C-CFT uptake in the caudate nuclei (CN) and putamen (Pu) normalized with cerebellum (CN/Cb and Pu/Cb) were obtained with a manual method and NeuroQ software, and their diagnostic performance was compared.18F-FDG uptake of specific regions was also obtained with NeuroQ, and the enhancement effect for the differential diagnosis was evaluated. There was significant agreement between the manual method and the NeuroQ method for 11C-CFT uptake by CN (r2 = 0.680) and Pu (r2 = 0.770). 11C-CFT uptake by CN and Pu in PD and MSA patients was significantly lower compared to NC and ET patients. The cutoffs of CN/Cb and Pu/Cb for the distinction between PD and NC were 1.71 and 2.20, respectively. No difference in uptake ratios occurred between PD and MSA. 18F-FDG uptake by the pons and cerebellum in the MSA group was markedly decreased. It was highly accurate in distinguishing between PD and MSA when combined with analysis of 11C-CFT uptake. Pu/Cb decreased significantly in mild grade PD compared to NC group (1.92 ± 0.33 vs. 2.82 ± 0.43); however no statistically significant decrease in CN/Cb was observed until moderate-severe grade PD (1.43 ± 0.11 vs. 2.23 ± 0.36). In early asymmetric PD, a statistically significant difference could be seen with Pu/Cb between the symptomatic and asymptomatic side (2.17 ± 0.30 vs. 1.95 ± 0.22). 11C-CFT and 18F-FDG PET/CT can be analyzed quantitatively with NeuroQ software, which provides an accurate method for the diagnosis and severity evaluation of PD.Entities:
Keywords: 11C-CFT; 18F-FDG; NeuroQ; PET; Parkinson’s disease; diagnosis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31024233 PMCID: PMC6460224 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00299
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
FIGURE 1Processing steps for PET data with NeuroQ software. After being imported into NeuroQ, the PET DICOM data were treated with four processing steps: (A) setting axial limits, (B) removing scalp activity, (C) rigid registration, and (D) reformatting to fit into the standard template with 47 clusters. For 18F-FDG PET data, the results of each ROI could be compared to the normal database and displayed the standard deviation (SD) from mean value of the database with the color scale. Blue to red indicates the increasing of the SD.
FIGURE 2Correlation between manual method and NeuroQ software for the 11C-CFT PET analysis. (A) Correlation for the uptake ratio of caudate nuclei to the cerebellum (CN/Cb). CN/Cb (Manual) represents the data obtained with the manual method; CN/Cb (NeuroQ) represents the data obtained with NeuroQ software. A good correlation can be seen (r= 0.680, P < 0.01). (B) Correlation for the uptake ratio of putamen to the cerebellum (Pu/Cb). Pu/Cb (Manual) represents the data obtained with manual the method; Pu/Cb (NeuroQ) represents the data obtained with NeuroQ software. There is good correlation between them (r= 0.770, P < 0.01).
Correlation between the manual method and the NeuroQ method for the 11C-CFT uptake ratio of ROIs.
| Variables | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PD | NC | MSA | ET | ||
| CN/Cb (Manual) and CN/Cb (NeuroQ) | 0.680∗ | 0.772∗ | 0.421Δ | 0.381 | 0.263 |
| Pu/Cb (Manual) and Pu/Cb (NeuroQ) | 0.770∗ | 0.712∗ | 0.457Δ | 0.571Δ | 0.433Δ |
Single factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) of 11C-CFT and 18F-FDG uptake in ROIs between different diagnostic groups.
| Test groups | 11C-CFT | 18F-FDG | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual | NeuroQ | NeuroQ | |||||||
| CN/Cb | Pu/Cb | CN/Cb | Pu/Cb | CN | Pu | MB | Pons | Cb | |
| (1) PD | 1.16 ± 0.50 | 0.69 ± 0.27 | 1.67 ± 0.36 | 1.74 ± 0.31 | 0.93 ± 0.05 | 1.19 ± 0.06 | 0.72 ± 0.04 | 0.65 ± 0.03 | 0.92 ± 0.04 |
| (2)NC | 1.82 ± 0.24 | 1.98 ± 0.21 | 2.23 ± 0.36 | 2.82 ± 0.43 | 0.96 ± 0.04 | 1.18 ± 0.04 | 0.73 ± 0.02 | 0.66 ± 0.02 | 0.91 ± 0.03 |
| (3) MSA | 1.21 ± 0.52 | 1.02 ± 0.62 | 1.74 ± 0.34 | 1.79 ± 0.35 | 0.96 ± 0.06 | 1.15 ± 0.10 | 0.74 ± 0.02 | 0.58 ± 0.03 | 0.71 ± 0.07 |
| (4) ET | 2.03 ± 0.21 | 2.14 ± 0.25 | 2.50 ± 0.47 | 3.16 ± 0.49 | 0.94 ± 0.05 | 1.18 ± 0.04 | 0.72 ± 0.02 | 0.65 ± 0.02 | 0.90 ± 0.03 |
| Sig.1/2 | 0.000∗ | 0.000∗ | 0.000∗ | 0.000∗ | 0.067 | 0.608 | 0.186 | 0.302 | 0.630 |
| Sig.1/3 | 1.000 | 0.577 | 0.644 | 0.743 | 0.092 | 0.064 | 0.048Δ | 0.000∗ | 0.000∗ |
| Sig.1/4 | 0.000∗ | 0.000∗ | 0.000∗ | 0.000∗ | 0.521 | 0.631 | 0.750 | 0.911 | 0.318 |
| Sig.2/3 | 0.030Δ | 0.004∗ | 0.004∗ | 0.000∗ | 0.930 | 0.221 | 0.520 | 0.000∗ | 0.000∗ |
| Sig.2/4 | 0.284 | 0.665 | 0.125 | 0.059 | 0.355 | 0.985 | 0.430 | 0.461 | 0.607 |
| Sig.3/4 | 0.004∗ | 0.001∗ | 0.000∗ | 0.000∗ | 0.408 | 0.266 | 0.175 | 0.000∗ | 0.000∗ |
Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of 11C-CFT and 18F-FDG between different diagnostic groups (NeuroQ).
| Test groups | Test variable | AUC | Sig. | Youden index | Cutoff | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PD vs. NC | CN/Cb | 0.866 | 0.001∗ | 0.700 | 1.71 | 70.0% | 100% |
| Pu/Cb | 0.982 | 0.000∗ | 0.950 | 2.20 | 95.0% | 100% | |
| PD vs. MSA | CN/Cb | 0.593 | 0.110 | 0.350 | 1.56 | 55.0% | 80.0% |
| Pu/Cb | 0.553 | 0.107 | 0.250 | 1.50 | 35.0% | 90.0% | |
| PD vs. ET | CN/Cb | 0.925 | 0.001∗ | 0.775 | 2.11 | 87.5% | 90.0% |
| Pu/Cb | 1.000 | 0.000∗ | 1.000 | 2.62 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| MSA vs. NC | FDG-Pons | 0.991 | 0.000∗ | 0.909 | 0.63 | 90.9% | 100.0% |
| FDG-Cb | 1.000 | 0.000∗ | 1.000 | 0.86 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| MSA vs. PD | FDG-Pons | 0.980 | 0.021Δ | 0.850 | 0.61 | 90.0% | 0.950 |
| FDG-Cb | 1.000 | 0.000∗ | 1.000 | 0.85 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| MSA vs. ET | FDG-Pons | 1.000 | 0.000∗ | 1.000 | 0.63 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| FDG-Cb | 1.000 | 0.000∗ | 1.000 | 0.85 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| PD vs. MSA | CN/Cb and FDG-Pons | 0.995 | 0.000∗ | 0.950 | NA | 95.0% | 100.0% |
| CN/Cb and FDG-Cb | 1.000 | 0.000∗ | 1.000 | NA | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| Pu/Cb and FDG-Pons | 1.000 | 0.000∗ | 1.000 | NA | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| Pu/Cb and FDG-Cb | 1.000 | 0.000∗ | 1.000 | NA | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
Single factor analysis of variance (ANOVA)of 11C-CFT uptake in basal ganglia between different clinical grade.
| Clinical grade | Age (Y) | Course (Y) | Manual | NeuroQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN/Cb | Pu/Cb | CN/Cb | Pu/Cb | |||
| (1) Mild | 59.18 ± 10.91 | 3.00 ± 0.87 | 1.50 ± 0.42 | 0.90 ± 0.19 | 1.87 ± 0.36 | 1.92 ± 0.33 |
| (2) Moderate-Severe | 57.67 ± 12.14 | 3.82 ± 2.66 | 0.75 ± 0.20 | 0.44 ± 0.08 | 1.43 ± 0.11 | 1.53 ± 0.10 |
| (3) NC | 61.09 ± 16.40 | NA | 1.81 ± 0.24 | 1.98 ± 0.21 | 2.23 ± 0.36 | 2.82 ± 0.43 |
| Sig.1/2 | 0.795 | 0.928 | 0.001∗ | 0.005∗ | 0.014Δ | 0.018Δ |
| Sig.1/3 | 0.730 | NA | 0.241 | 0.000∗ | 0.157 | 0.000∗ |
| Sig.2/3 | 0.557 | NA | 0.000∗ | 0.000∗ | 0.000∗ | 0.000∗ |
Paired t-test for the 11C-CFT uptake of basal ganglia between the symptomatic side and asymptomatic side in the early asymmetric PD patients.
| Side | Manual | NeruroQ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN/Cb | Pu/Cb | CN/Cb | Pu/Cb | ||
| M ± SD | Symptomatic | 1.70 ± 0.33 | 1.06 ± 0.25 | 2.06 ± 0.32 | 2.17 ± 0.30 |
| Asymptomatic | 1.65 ± 0.30 | 0.85 ± 0.10 | 1.98 ± 0.27 | 1.95 ± 0.22 | |
| 1.450 | 3.147 | 1.779 | 3.981 | ||
| Sig. | 0.190 | 0.016Δ | 0.118 | 0.005∗ | |