Literature DB >> 31023697

Low Rates of Patient-Reported Physician-Patient Discussion about Lung Cancer Screening among Current Smokers: Data from Health Information National Trends Survey.

Jinhai Huo1, Young-Rock Hong2, Jiang Bian3, Yi Guo3, Diana J Wilkie4, Arch G Mainous2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many professional societies published guidelines recommending lung cancer screening with low-dose CT scan. We examined the temporal trends in patient-reported physician-patient discussions about lung cancer screening, and aimed to determine the association of discussions of lung cancer screening with the smokers' attempt to quit and intent to quit.
METHODS: Data from years 2012, 2014, and 2017 of the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) were combined to create a multiple-year analytic dataset. We calculated the association between samples' characteristics and the presence of discussion about lung cancer screening. Using logistic regression, we estimated the probability of smokers' attempt to quit and intent to quit.
RESULTS: Among 9,443 subjects, the crude estimated rates of physician-patient discussion decreased from 6.7% in 2012, to 4.2% in 2014 and 4.3% in 2017. Across the age and smoking status groups, the current smokers ages 55 to 74 in 2012 (26.8%), and current smokers older than 74 years in 2014 (23.5%) and 2017 (22.1%) had the highest rates of discussion. The physician-patient discussion about lung cancer screening was not associated with patients' intent to quit or attempt to quit in a multivariable analysis.Conclusions: Efforts are needed to improve the physician-patient discussion about lung cancer screening among individuals across a spectrum of lung cancer risk. IMPACT: Developing communication strategies for promoting beneficial lung cancer screening among lung cancer screening-eligible smokers and strategies for improving the quality of discussion on lung cancer screening integrating smoking cessation are needed to reduce the burden of lung cancer. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31023697     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  5 in total

1.  Adherence to annual lung cancer screening with low-dose CT scan in a diverse population.

Authors:  Cherie P Erkmen; Farouk Dako; Ryan Moore; Chandra Dass; Mark G Weiner; Larry R Kaiser; Grace X Ma
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Developing the Florida Academic Cancer Center Alliance Health Disparities Common Measure: The Florida Health and Ancestry Survey.

Authors:  Brenda W Dyal; Zulema L Uscanga; Zinzi Bailey; Stephanie Schmit; Alina Hoehn; Jennifer Garcia; Clement K Gwede; Naomi Brownstein; Keesha Powell-Roach; Versie Johnson-Mallard; Janice L Krieger; Erin Kobetz; Susan Vadaparampil; Folakemi T Odedina; Diana J Wilkie
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.339

3.  Promoting Clinical Conversations about Lung Cancer Screening: Exploring the Role of Perceived Online Social Support.

Authors:  Samantha R Paige; Ramzi G Salloum; Janice L Krieger; Maribeth Williams; Wei Xue; Babette Brumback
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2020-10-29

4.  The Influence of Increasing Levels of Provider-Patient Discussion on Quit Behavior: An Instrumental Variable Analysis of a National Survey.

Authors:  Bian Liu; Serena Zhan; Karen M Wilson; Madhu Mazumdar; Lihua Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Predictors of Discussing Lung Cancer Screening with a Health Care Provider Among Current and Former Smokers in HINTS: A Secondary Data Analysis.

Authors:  Shacoria L Anderson; Melvin D Livingston; Kristin A Higgins; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.339

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.