| Literature DB >> 31022933 |
Mingyao Liu1,2, Wenzhi Wang3,4, Han Song5,6, Shiguang Zhou7,8, Weijian Zhou9,10.
Abstract
For the purpose of improving the sensitivity of the fiber Bragg grating (FBG)-based strain sensor. A novel FBG-based strain sensor with high sensibility was designed by means of a flexible hinge bridge displacement magnification structure. This sensor can be used to accurately measure the strain of a mechanical structure surface. In this paper, the strain sensitization amplification factor of the sensor was calculated by using the flexible matrix method and the strain energy theory. The magnification had been verified by using simulation analysis and experimental results, and the error between theoretical calculation and simulation analysis was less than 7%. The result shows that the strain sensitivity of the sensor is 10.84 pm/με, which is about 10 times to that of the bare FBG sensor. This sensor is sensitive to micro-strain, so it can be well applied to health monitoring of a mechanical system.Entities:
Keywords: FBG-based strain sensor; flexibility matrix method; flexible hinge; sensitization
Year: 2019 PMID: 31022933 PMCID: PMC6515397 DOI: 10.3390/s19081931
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Real image of the designed sensor.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of the sensor.
Figure 3Flat single-axis straight circular flexible hinge. (a) Three-dimensional model, (b) Plane model.
Figure 4Bounding conditions and loading for quarter-model.
The structural parameters of the substrate.
| Parameter | Parameter | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.34 | 0.8 × 10−3 | |
| 110 × 109 | 0.5 × 10−3 | ||
| 0.4 × 10−3 | 5 × 10−3 | ||
| 5 | 1.6 × 10−3 | ||
| 70 × 109 | 10.64 × 10−3 | ||
| 125 × 10−6 | 1.6 × 10−3 | ||
| 3 × 10−3 | 1.7 × 10−3 |
Figure 5Assembly 3D model.
Material parameters used in simulation.
| Component | Young Modulus (GPa) | Poisson Ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Substrate | 110 | 0.34 |
| FBG | 74 | 0.33 |
| Beam | 200 | 0.30 |
Figure 6Simulation diagram of sensor. (a) Horizontal deformation, (b) Vertical deformation.
Figure 7Dynamic simulation model.
Figure 8Harmonic response results from 0 Hz to 10 000 Hz.
Figure 9Experimental platform construction.
Figure 10The experiment results. Left: Strain calibration curve; Right: Fitting curve of sensitivity.