Literature DB >> 31022469

Grading and baseline characteristics of meibomian glands in meibography images and their clinical associations in the Dry Eye Assessment and Management (DREAM) study.

Ebenezer Daniel1, Maureen G Maguire2, Maxwell Pistilli2, Vatinee Y Bunya2, Giacomina M Massaro-Giordano2, Eli Smith2, Pooja A Kadakia3, Penny A Asbell4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe and evaluate a comprehensive grading system for meibomian gland (MG) digital infrared images developed for the Dry Eye Assessment and Management (DREAM) Study.
METHODS: Cross-sectional study. Reading Center (RC) certified readers independently evaluated MG features of both lids from meibography images of dry eye disease subjects. Dropout areas were measured using planimetry software. Inter-reader and grade-regrade agreement and comparison of meiboscale scores (Meiboscale©; Pult) from clinical centers to RC percent dropout and of MG features with clinical parameters were evaluated.
RESULTS: Among 551 eyes of 277 patients at baseline, 62 (11%) upper lid and 5 (1%) lower lid images were missing. Lid eversion was poor in 63 (13%) of upper lids compared to 15 (3%) of lower lids. Intraclass correlation for inter-reader and grade-regrade agreement was moderate to substantial for most MG features. MG features were more frequent in the upper lid (p < 0.001), except for dropout glands, gaps, fluffy gland areas and dropout areas. Clinic meiboscale score was associated with RC percent dropout (p < 0.001), a clinic score of 0% having a mean RC score of 19%, and a clinic score of >75% having a mean RC score of 66%. MG plugging was associated with ghost glands (p = 0.009), dropout glands (p < 0.001) and a composite severity score (p = 0.02); turbid and absent secretions were associated with ghost glands (p = 0.046).
CONCLUSION: RC readers identified MG features with good reproducibility. Upper lids had more MG features. RC dropout areas correlated well with clinic meiboscale scores. Ghost glands were associated with paste like and absent meibomian secretions.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dry eye disease; Meibography; Meibomian glands; Morphology; Reading center

Year:  2019        PMID: 31022469      PMCID: PMC6708483          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2019.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ocul Surf        ISSN: 1542-0124            Impact factor:   5.033


  42 in total

1.  Relation between upper and lower lids' meibomian gland morphology, tear film, and dry eye.

Authors:  Heiko Pult; Britta H Riede-Pult; Jason J Nichols
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  A newly developed noninvasive and mobile pen-shaped meibography system.

Authors:  Reiko Arita; Kouzo Itoh; Shuji Maeda; Koshi Maeda; Shiro Amano
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Exploring the Asian ethnic predisposition to dry eye disease in a pediatric population.

Authors:  Ji Soo Kim; Michael T M Wang; Jennifer P Craig
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Non-contact meibography: keep it simple but effective.

Authors:  H Pult; B H Riede-Pult
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.077

5.  Detection of meibomian glands and classification of meibography images.

Authors:  Yang Wei Koh; Turgay Celik; Hwee Kuan Lee; Andrea Petznick; Louis Tong
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Functional and Morphologic Changes of Meibomian Glands in an Asymptomatic Adult Population.

Authors:  Nisha S Yeotikar; Hua Zhu; Maria Markoulli; Kelly K Nichols; Thomas Naduvilath; Eric B Papas
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  The significance of meibomian gland changes in asymptomatic children.

Authors:  Yinying Zhao; Siping Chen; Shangrong Wang; Yan Chen; Junhua Li; Yana Fu; Qi Dai; Xiaolei Lin; Yue Wu; Yune Zhao
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Association between meibomian gland changes and aging, sex, or tear function.

Authors:  Seika Den; Kazuhiro Shimizu; Tsunehiko Ikeda; Kazuo Tsubota; Shigeto Shimmura; Jun Shimazaki
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.651

10.  Objective image analysis of the meibomian gland area.

Authors:  Reiko Arita; Jun Suehiro; Tsuyoshi Haraguchi; Rika Shirakawa; Hideaki Tokoro; Shiro Amano
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  12 in total

1.  Quantifying Meibomian Gland Morphology Using Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Jiayun Wang; Shixuan Li; Thao N Yeh; Rudrasis Chakraborty; Andrew D Graham; Stella X Yu; Meng C Lin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.106

2.  Association of meibomian gland morphology with symptoms and signs of dry eye disease in the Dry Eye Assessment and Management (DREAM) study.

Authors:  Ebenezer Daniel; Maxwell Pistilli; Gui-Shuang Ying; Vatinee Y Bunya; Mina Massaro-Giordano; Penny A Asbell; Maureen G Maguire
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 3.  A review of meibography for a refractive surgeon.

Authors:  Krishna Poojita Vunnava; Naren Shetty; Kamal B Kapur
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Artificial Intelligence to Detect Meibomian Gland Dysfunction From in-vivo Laser Confocal Microscopy.

Authors:  Ye-Ye Zhang; Hui Zhao; Jin-Yan Lin; Shi-Nan Wu; Xi-Wang Liu; Hong-Dan Zhang; Yi Shao; Wei-Feng Yang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-25

5.  Quantitative analysis of morphological and functional features in Meibography for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: Diagnosis and Grading.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Qian Wang; Zhongzhou Luo; Saiqun Li; Bowen Wang; Jing Zhong; Lulu Peng; Peng Xiao; Jin Yuan
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-09-11

6.  Comparative of meibomian gland morphology in patients with evaporative dry eye disease versus non-dry eye disease.

Authors:  Ricaurte Ramiro Crespo-Treviño; Anna Karen Salinas-Sánchez; Francisco Amparo; Manuel Garza-Leon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Alterations in meibomian glands in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Xiangjun Chen; Reza A Badian; Håvard Hynne; Cecilie Delphin Amdal; Bente Brokstad Herlofson; Øygunn Aass Utheim; Kristine Løken Westgaard; Fredrik Fineide; Janicke Liaaen Jensen; Tor Paaske Utheim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Morphology of Meibomian Glands in a 65-Year-Old Norwegian Population without Dry Eye Disease.

Authors:  Xiangjun Chen; Reza A Badian; Håvard Hynne; Behzod Tashbayev; Lene Hystad Hove; Janicke Liaaen Jensen; Tor Paaske Utheim
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Morphological and Functional Changes of Meibomian Glands in Pediatric and Adult Patients with Allergic Conjunctivitis.

Authors:  Yuqing Wu; Hao Jiang; Xujiao Zhou; Zimeng Zhai; Pei Yang; Shuyun Zhou; Hao Gu; Jianjiang Xu; Jiaxu Hong
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 10.  A Review of Imaging Biomarkers of the Ocular Surface.

Authors:  William W Binotti; Betul Bayraktutar; M Cuneyt Ozmen; Stephanie M Cox; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.152

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.