Literature DB >> 31022111

Home and Birth Center Birth in the United States: Time for Greater Collaboration Across Models of Care.

Aaron B Caughey1, Melissa Cheyney.   

Abstract

There has been a small, but significant, increase in community births (home and birth-center births) in the United States in recent years. The rate increased by 20% from 2004 to 2008, and another 59% from 2008 to 2012, though the overall rate is still low at less than 2%. Although the United States is not the only country with a large majority of births occurring in the hospital, there are other high-resource countries where home and birth-center birth are far more common and where community midwives (those attending births at home and in birth centers) are far more central to the provision of care. In many such countries, the differences in perinatal outcomes between hospital and community births are small, and there are lower rates of maternal morbidity in the community setting. In the United States, perinatal mortality appears to be higher for community births, though there has yet to be a national study comparing outcomes across settings that controls for planned place of birth. Rates of intervention, including cesarean delivery, are significantly higher in hospital births in the United States. Compared with the United States, countries that have higher rates of community births have better integrated systems with clearer national guidelines governing risk criteria and planned birth location, as well as transfer to higher levels of care. Differences in outcomes, systems, approaches, and client motivations are important to understand, because they are critical to the processes of person-centered care and to risk reduction across all birth settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31022111     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Loss of Obstetric Services in Rural Appalachia: A Qualitative Study of Community Perceptions.

Authors:  Caroline R Efird; David Dry; Rachel F Seidman
Journal:  J Appalach Health       Date:  2021-05-03

2.  Low-Risk Planned Out-of-Hospital Births: Characteristics and Perinatal Outcomes in Different Italian Birth Settings.

Authors:  Marta Campiotti; Rita Campi; Michele Zanetti; Paola Olivieri; Alice Faggianelli; Maurizio Bonati
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Home Birth in the Era of COVID-19: Counseling and Preparation for Pregnant Persons Living with HIV.

Authors:  Ashish Premkumar; Irina Cassimatis; Saba H Berhie; Jennifer Jao; Susan E Cohn; Sarah H Sutton; Brianne Condron; Jordan Levesque; Patricia M Garcia; Emily S Miller; Lynn M Yee
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Maternity Care Preferences for Future Pregnancies Among United States Childbearers: The Impacts of COVID-19.

Authors:  Theresa E Gildner; Zaneta M Thayer
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2021-02-18

5.  Birth Outcomes for Planned Home and Licensed Freestanding Birth Center Births in Washington State.

Authors:  Elizabeth Nethery; Laura Schummers; Audrey Levine; Aaron B Caughey; Vivienne Souter; Wendy Gordon
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  The Impacts of COVID-19 on US Maternity Care Practices: A Followup Study.

Authors:  Kim Gutschow; Robbie Davis-Floyd
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2021-05-27

7.  Are perinatal quality collaboratives collaborating enough? How including all birth settings can drive needed improvement in the United States maternity care system.

Authors:  Audrey Levine; Vivienne Souter; Carol Sakala
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.081

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.