Literature DB >> 3102189

Response of porcine lower esophageal sphincter to increasing intraabdominal pressure.

B R Landers, G G Jamieson.   

Abstract

The response of lower esophageal sphincter pressure to increasing intraabdominal pressure was investigated in six anesthetized pigs while measuring the intraabdominal pressure directly with a perfused catheter and recording continuously from the lower esophageal sphincter using a manometric catheter incorporating a constantly perfused sleeve. Studies were conducted both before and after the administration of intravenous atropine. Resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure was 8 mm Hg (3-19 mm Hg). In response to inflation of the peritoneal cavity with carbon dioxide gas, lower esophageal sphincter pressure rose significantly more than intraabdominal pressure whether the stomach was empty or full. In three of the six pigs, phasic lower esophageal sphincter pressure variations occurred as intraabdominal pressure increased. These variations were unrelated to respiration. Resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure was little affected by 75 micrograms/kg intravenous atropine which also had no effect on the lower esophageal sphincter response to increasing intraabdominal pressure. We conclude that, in the pig, the lower esophageal sphincter pressure increases more than the intraabdominal pressure in response to challenge and that excitatory cholinergic fibers do not mediate this response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3102189     DOI: 10.1007/bf01297053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  35 in total

1.  Effect of increased intraabdominal pressure on lower esophageal sphincter pressure.

Authors:  W J Dodds; W J Hogan; W N Miller; J J Stef; R C Arndorfer; S B Lydon
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1975-04

2.  RESPONSE OF THE PHYSIOLOGIC GASTROESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER TO INCREASED INTRA-ABDOMINAL PRESSURE.

Authors:  G VANDERSTAPPEN; E C TEXTER
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Neural control of the lower esophageal sphincter: influence of the vagus nerves.

Authors:  S Rattan; R K Goyal
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Manometric study of the effect of vagotomy on the gastroesophageal sphincter.

Authors:  J S Crispin; D K McIver; J F Lind
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Lower esophageal sphincter pressure in cirrhotic men with ascites: before and after diuresis.

Authors:  D H Van Thiel; J F Stremple
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Experimental esophagitis in cats impairs lower esophageal sphincter pressure.

Authors:  G L Eastwood; D O Castell; R H Higgs
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Effects of acute experimental esophagitis on mechanical properties of the lower esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  P Biancani; K Barwick; J Selling; R McCallum
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  The effect of vagotomy on human gastroesophageal sphincter pressure in the resting state and following increases in intra-abdominal pressure.

Authors:  A Csendes; M Oster; O Brandsborg; J T Møller; H Overgaard; M Brandsborg; P Funch-Jensen; E Amdrup
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Effect of atropine on esophageal motor function in humans.

Authors:  W J Dodds; J Dent; W J Hogan; R C Arndorfer
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1981-04

10.  Gastric distention: a mechanism for postprandial gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  R H Holloway; M Hongo; K Berger; R W McCallum
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  3 in total

1.  Architecture and function of the gastroesophageal barrier in the piglet.

Authors:  Y Vicente; C Da Rocha; J Yu; G Hernandez-Peredo; L Martinez; B Pérez-Mies; J A Tovar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Cricoid pressure decreases lower oesophageal sphincter tone in anaesthetized pigs.

Authors:  D Chassard; J P Tournadre; K R Berrada; P Boulétreau
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Response of lower esophageal sphincter to alterations of intraabdominal pressure.

Authors:  C DiLorenzo; C P Dooley; J E Valenzuela
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.