Literature DB >> 31021745

Conceptual Intra-Cardiac Electrode Configurations That Facilitate Directional Cardiac Stimulation for Optimal Electrotherapy.

Adam Connolly, Steven Williams, Kawal Rhode, Christopher A Rinaldi, Martin J Bishop.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Electrotherapy remains the most effective direct therapy against lethal cardiac arrhythmias. When an arrhythmic event is sensed, either strong electric shocks or controlled rapid pacing is automatically applied directly to the heart via an implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICDs). Despite their success, ICDs remain a highly non-optimal therapy: the strong shocks required for defibrillation cause significant extra-cardiac stimulation, resulting in pain and long-term tissue damage, and can also limit battery life. When used in anti-tachycardia pacing mode, ICDs are also often ineffective, as the pacing electrode can be far away from the centre of the arrhythmia, making it hard for the paced wave to interrupt and terminate it.
METHODS: In this paper, we present two conceptual intra-cardiac directional electrode configurations in silico based on novel arrangements of pairs of positive-negative electrodes. Both configurations have the potential to cause preferential excitation on specific regions of the heart.
RESULTS: We demonstrate how the properties of the induced field varies spatially around the electrodes and how it depends upon the specific arrangements of dipole electrode pairs. The results show that when tested within anatomically-realistic rabbit ventricular models, both electrode configurations produce strong virtual electrodes on the targeted endocardial surfaces, with weaker virtual electrodes produced elsewhere.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed electrode configurations may facilitate targeted far-field anti-tachycardia pacing and/or defibrillation, which may be useful in cases where conventional anti-tachycardia pacing fails. In addition, the conceptual electrode designs intrinsically confine the electric field to the immediate vicinity of the electrodes, and may, thus, minimize pain due to unnecessary extra-cardiac stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31021745      PMCID: PMC7054045          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2871863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  45 in total

1.  Virtual electrode polarization in the far field: implications for external defibrillation.

Authors:  I R Efimov; F Aguel; Y Cheng; B Wollenzier; N Trayanova
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Role of intramural virtual electrodes in shock-induced activation of left ventricle: optical measurements from the intact epicardial surface.

Authors:  Oleg F Sharifov; Vladimir G Fast
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  Mystery of biphasic defibrillation waveform efficacy is it calcium?

Authors:  James P Daubert; Shey-Shing Sheu
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Multiple monophasic shocks improve electrotherapy of ventricular tachycardia in a rabbit model of chronic infarction.

Authors:  Wenwen Li; Crystal M Ripplinger; Qing Lou; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  A comparison of biphasic and monophasic waveform defibrillation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  W Tang; M H Weil; S Sun; H P Povoas; K Klouche; T Kamohara; J Bisera
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 6.  Simulating the electrical behavior of cardiac tissue using the bidomain model.

Authors:  C S Henriquez
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  1993

7.  Interactions between paced wavefronts and monomorphic ventricular tachycardia: implications for antitachycardia pacing.

Authors:  Israel A Byrd; Matthew W Kay; Andrew E Pollard
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-10

8.  Empirical versus tested antitachycardia pacing in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a prospective study including 200 patients.

Authors:  A Schaumann; F von zur Mühlen; B Herse; B D Gonska; H Kreuzer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998 Jan 6-13       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Comparison of conventional and biventricular antitachycardia pacing in a geometrically realistic model of the rabbit ventricle.

Authors:  Israel A Byrd; Jack M Rogers; William M Smith; Andrew E Pollard
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-09

Review 10.  Optimizing defibrillation waveforms for ICDs.

Authors:  Mark W Kroll; Charles D Swerdlow
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 1.900

View more
  2 in total

1.  An in-silico assessment of efficacy of two novel intra-cardiac electrode configurations versus traditional anti-tachycardia pacing therapy for terminating sustained ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  Shuang Qian; Adam Connolly; Caroline Mendonca-Costa; Fernando Campos; Steven E Williams; John Whitaker; Christopher A Rinaldi; Martin J Bishop
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 4.589

2.  Computational Model for Therapy Optimization of Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator: Shockable Rhythm Detection and Optimal Electrotherapy.

Authors:  Oishee Mazumder; Rohan Banerjee; Dibyendu Roy; Ayan Mukherjee; Avik Ghose; Sundeep Khandelwal; Aniruddha Sinha
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.566

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.