Literature DB >> 31021658

Development and Evaluation of a Novel Point-of-Use Quality Assurance Tool for Digital Pathology.

Emily L Clarke1, David Brettle1, Alexander Sykes1, Alexander Wright1, Anna Boden1, Darren Treanor.   

Abstract

CONTEXT.—: Flexible working at diverse or remote sites is a major advantage when reporting using digital pathology, but currently there is no method to validate the clinical diagnostic setting within digital microscopy. OBJECTIVE.—: To develop a preliminary Point-of-Use Quality Assurance (POUQA) tool designed specifically to validate the diagnostic setting for digital microscopy. DESIGN.—: We based the POUQA tool on the red, green, and blue (RGB) values of hematoxylin-eosin. The tool used 144 hematoxylin-eosin-colored, 5×5-cm patches with a superimposed random letter with subtly lighter RGB values from the background color, with differing levels of difficulty. We performed an initial evaluation across 3 phases within 2 pathology departments: 1 in the United Kingdom and 1 in Sweden. RESULTS.—: In total, 53 experiments were conducted across all phases resulting in 7632 test images viewed in all. Results indicated that the display, the user's visual system, and the environment each independently impacted performance. Performance was improved with reduction in natural light and through use of medical-grade displays. CONCLUSIONS.—: The use of a POUQA tool for digital microscopy is essential to afford flexible working while ensuring patient safety. The color-contrast test provides a standardized method of comparing diagnostic settings for digital microscopy. With further planned development, the color-contrast test may be used to create a "Verified Login" for diagnostic setting validation.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31021658     DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0210-OA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  4 in total

1.  A Point-of-Use Quality Assurance Tool for Digital Pathology Remote Working.

Authors:  Alexander I Wright; Emily L Clarke; Catriona M Dunn; Bethany J Williams; Darren E Treanor; David S Brettle
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2020-07-16

Review 2.  Display Characteristics and Their Impact on Digital Pathology: A Current Review of Pathologists' Future "Microscope".

Authors:  Jacob T Abel; Peter Ouillette; Christopher L Williams; John Blau; Jerome Cheng; Keluo Yao; Winston Y Lee; Toby C Cornish; Ulysses G J Balis; David S McClintock
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2020-08-11

Review 3.  [Digitalization of healthcare and its effects on quality of care].

Authors:  Jan Benedikt Brönneke; Jörg Felix Debatin
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Remote Reporting During a Pandemic Using Digital Pathology Solution: Experience from a Tertiary Care Cancer Center.

Authors:  Veena Ramaswamy; B N Tejaswini; Sowmya B Uthaiah
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2021-04-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.