Literature DB >> 3102165

Clinical characteristics and resource utilization of ICU patients: implications for organization of intensive care.

R J Henning, D McClish, B Daly, H Nearman, C Franklin, D Jackson.   

Abstract

We reviewed the clinical characteristics and resource utilization of 391 medical (M) and 315 surgical (S) ICU patients. In general, MICU patients had more physiologic derangement, as determined by the admission, maximal, and average acute physiology scores (APS). SICU patients had more frequent therapeutic interventions as measured by admission, maximal, and average therapeutic intervention scoring system values. Notably, 40% of MICU and 30% of SICU patients never received any active interventions and were admitted strictly for monitoring purposes. Patients on admission with APS less than or equal to 10 had markedly shorter ICU stays, with almost 50% less treatment than patients with APS over 10. Fifty-six percent of patients with APS less than or equal to 10 did not require any active intervention. In contrast, 83% of patients with APS greater than 10 had considerable intensive interventions. These patients required mechanical ventilation, invasive monitoring, and vasoactive drugs more than twice as often as patients with lower APS scores. Consideration should be given, therefore, to the organization of ICUs according to the patient's severity of illness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3102165     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-198703000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  15 in total

1.  Intermediate respiratory intensive care units in Europe: a European perspective.

Authors:  S Nava; M Confalonieri; C Rampulla
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Predicting outcome in critical care: the current status of the APACHE prognostic scoring system.

Authors:  D T Wong; W A Knaus
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 3.  The economics and cost-effectiveness of critical care medicine.

Authors:  D B Chalfin; I L Cohen; J Lambrinos
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Improving postoperative care: the role of the surgeon in the high dependency unit.

Authors:  R Coggins; L de Cossart
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  An analysis of the utilisation of an intensive care unit.

Authors:  S Jacobs; R W Chang; B Lee; B Lee
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Patient characteristics and resource utilisation in paediatric intensive care.

Authors:  R J Gemke; G J Bonsel; J McDonnell; A J van Vught
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Pressure transducers: an overlooked source of sepsis in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  T A Hekker; W van Overhagen; A J Schneider
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Outcomes of Emergency Medical Patients Admitted to an Intermediate Care Unit With Detailed Admission Guidelines.

Authors:  Catherine E Simpson; Sarina K Sahetya; Robert W Bradsher; Eric L Scholten; William Bain; Shazia M Siddique; David N Hager
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 9.  The role of stepdown beds in hospital care.

Authors:  Meghan Prin; Hannah Wunsch
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 21.405

10.  Audit of intensive care unit admissions from the operating room.

Authors:  D Swann; P Houston; J Goldberg
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.