Shaoxia Pan1, Danni Guo1, Yongsheng Zhou1, Ronald E Jung2, Christoph H F Hämmerle2, Sven Mühlemann2. 1. Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing, P.R. China. 2. Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical and laboratory time efficiency and quality of outcomes for posterior single implant crowns by means of a model-free digital workflow using digital impressions immediately after implant placement. METHODS: Forty patients missing a single posterior tooth received implant therapy. For within-subject comparison, digital impressions were taken immediately after implant placement and conventional impressions after implant healing. Two monolithic zirconia crowns were fabricated using a laboratory-based CAD-CAM system. One crown was produced from the immediate digital impression and a model-free digital workflow (test group), and the second crown was produced from the conventional impression and a hybrid workflow (control group). Clinical and laboratory time was recorded. Quality of outcomes was evaluated double-blinded. A paired-sample t test was applied for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The total mean chairside time (impression and delivery) was 23.2 min (95%CI 22.2, 24.3) in the test group and 25.7 min (95%CI 24.4, 26.9) in the control group (p = 0.013). Significantly less laboratory time was needed in the model-free digital workflow (13.6 min, 95%CI 11.5, 15.6) as compared to the model-based hybrid workflow (29.9 min, 95%CI 25.7, 34.2) (p < 0.05). At crown delivery, 4/40 (test) and 12/40 (control) had no need of chairside adjustments, and 6/40 (test) and 5/40 (control) implant crowns were in need of additional laboratory interventions. CONCLUSION: The fabrication of posterior single implant crowns using digital impressions taken immediately after implant placement and a model-free, laboratory-based digital workflow was more time efficient and resulted in similar quality of outcomes as a hybrid workflow using conventional impressions.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical and laboratory time efficiency and quality of outcomes for posterior single implant crowns by means of a model-free digital workflow using digital impressions immediately after implant placement. METHODS: Forty patients missing a single posterior tooth received implant therapy. For within-subject comparison, digital impressions were taken immediately after implant placement and conventional impressions after implant healing. Two monolithic zirconia crowns were fabricated using a laboratory-based CAD-CAM system. One crown was produced from the immediate digital impression and a model-free digital workflow (test group), and the second crown was produced from the conventional impression and a hybrid workflow (control group). Clinical and laboratory time was recorded. Quality of outcomes was evaluated double-blinded. A paired-sample t test was applied for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The total mean chairside time (impression and delivery) was 23.2 min (95%CI 22.2, 24.3) in the test group and 25.7 min (95%CI 24.4, 26.9) in the control group (p = 0.013). Significantly less laboratory time was needed in the model-free digital workflow (13.6 min, 95%CI 11.5, 15.6) as compared to the model-based hybrid workflow (29.9 min, 95%CI 25.7, 34.2) (p < 0.05). At crown delivery, 4/40 (test) and 12/40 (control) had no need of chairside adjustments, and 6/40 (test) and 5/40 (control) implant crowns were in need of additional laboratory interventions. CONCLUSION: The fabrication of posterior single implant crowns using digital impressions taken immediately after implant placement and a model-free, laboratory-based digital workflow was more time efficient and resulted in similar quality of outcomes as a hybrid workflow using conventional impressions.