David H Moisa1, Julie A Connolly1, Bin Cheng2, Evanthia Lalla1. 1. Division of Periodontics, College of Dental Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY. 2. Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare thick versus thin connective tissue grafts (CTG) for the treatment of gingival recession, over a 3-month period. METHODS: Forty-two CTG procedures were performed on single tooth Miller Class I or II recession defects at either premolar or anterior sites in 30 individuals. Procedures were randomized (1:1 ratio) to CTG thickness of 1 or 2 mm (parallel group design). Primary outcomes were the change in the width of the zone of keratinized tissue and the amount of root coverage achieved 3 months postoperatively at the recipient site. Secondary outcomes included change in the thickness of keratinized tissue at 3 months and patient-reported outcomes, such as pain, bleeding, and swelling at both the recipient and donor sites at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the two groups for any of the primary or secondary outcomes. Mean root coverage achieved was 2.1 ± 0.2 mm in the 1-mm thick group and 2.5 ± 0.2 mm in the 2-mm thick group (P = 0.33). Keratinized tissue width was increased by 2.2 ± 0.2 mm in the 1-mm thick group and by 2.7 ± 0.3 mm in the 2-mm thick group (P = 0.18). Keratinized tissue thickness was increased by 1.0 ± 0.1 mm and by 1.2 ± 0.1 mm in the 1- and 2-mm thick groups, respectively (P = 0.09). CONCLUSION: Within the current study limitations, our results suggest that similar root coverage and increase in the width and thickness of keratinized tissue can be achieved at 3 months whether a 1- or 2-mm thick CTG is used.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare thick versus thin connective tissue grafts (CTG) for the treatment of gingival recession, over a 3-month period. METHODS: Forty-two CTG procedures were performed on single tooth Miller Class I or II recession defects at either premolar or anterior sites in 30 individuals. Procedures were randomized (1:1 ratio) to CTG thickness of 1 or 2 mm (parallel group design). Primary outcomes were the change in the width of the zone of keratinized tissue and the amount of root coverage achieved 3 months postoperatively at the recipient site. Secondary outcomes included change in the thickness of keratinized tissue at 3 months and patient-reported outcomes, such as pain, bleeding, and swelling at both the recipient and donor sites at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the two groups for any of the primary or secondary outcomes. Mean root coverage achieved was 2.1 ± 0.2 mm in the 1-mm thick group and 2.5 ± 0.2 mm in the 2-mm thick group (P = 0.33). Keratinized tissue width was increased by 2.2 ± 0.2 mm in the 1-mm thick group and by 2.7 ± 0.3 mm in the 2-mm thick group (P = 0.18). Keratinized tissue thickness was increased by 1.0 ± 0.1 mm and by 1.2 ± 0.1 mm in the 1- and 2-mm thick groups, respectively (P = 0.09). CONCLUSION: Within the current study limitations, our results suggest that similar root coverage and increase in the width and thickness of keratinized tissue can be achieved at 3 months whether a 1- or 2-mm thick CTG is used.