Literature DB >> 31020534

Behavior of cerium dioxide nanoparticles in chernozem soils at different exposure scenarios.

Mikhail S Ermolin1, Natalia N Fedyunina2.   

Abstract

Nowadays, widespread application of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) inevitably leads to their release into the environment. Soils are regarded as the ultimate sink for ENPs. The study on mobility of ENPs in soils is important in the assessment of potential risks related to their toxicity. The behavior of ENPs is dependent not only on parameters of soil but also on exposure scenarios, namely, the amount of ENPs trapped in soil. In the present work, the mobility of cerium dioxide nanoparticles (nCeO2) in soils at different exposure scenarios has been studied. The relationship between mobility of nCeO2 and their concentration in soil in the range from 1 to 1000 μg g-1 is evaluated. It is shown that the mobility of nCeO2 decreases with decreasing their concentration in soil and attains the minimum value at the concentration of nCeO2 below 10 μg g-1. In relative terms, only about 0.1-0.2% of nCeO2 at their concentration in soil 10-1000 μg g-1 are mobile and can migrate in soil profile under saturated conditions. The major portion of nCeO2 (about 99.8%) remains immobile in soil. Evidently, the vertical transport of nCeO2 in soil profile should depend on volume of released suspensions. In the case of small or moderate wet deposition, nanoparticles will accumulate in upper soil horizons, where biological activity is highest, and affect the soil inhabitants (plant roots, earthworms, insects, microorganisms, etc.).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerium dioxide; Chernozem; Mobility; Nanoparticles; Soil

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31020534     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05187-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  24 in total

1.  Fate assessment of engineered nanoparticles in solids dominated media - Current insights and the way forward.

Authors:  W Peijnenburg; A Praetorius; J Scott-Fordsmand; G Cornelis
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Nano-CeO2 exhibits adverse effects at environmental relevant concentrations.

Authors:  Haifeng Zhang; Xiao He; Zhiyong Zhang; Peng Zhang; Yuanyuan Li; Yuhui Ma; Yashu Kuang; Yuliang Zhao; Zhifang Chai
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 3.  Occurrence, behavior and effects of nanoparticles in the environment.

Authors:  Bernd Nowack; Thomas D Bucheli
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 8.071

4.  Transport and retention of fullerene nanoparticles in natural soils.

Authors:  Yonggang Wang; Yusong Li; Hyunjung Kim; Sharon L Walker; Linda M Abriola; Kurt D Pennell
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.751

5.  Evidence of the differential biotransformation and genotoxicity of ZnO and CeO2 nanoparticles on soybean (Glycine max) plants.

Authors:  Martha L López-Moreno; Guadalupe de la Rosa; José A Hernández-Viezcas; Hiram Castillo-Michel; Cristian E Botez; José R Peralta-Videa; Jorge L Gardea-Torresdey
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Ecotoxicological investigation of CeO(2) and TiO(2) nanoparticles on the soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans using gene expression, growth, fertility, and survival as endpoints.

Authors:  Ji-Yeon Roh; Young-Kwon Park; Kwangsik Park; Jinhee Choi
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.860

7.  Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: sources and toxicity.

Authors:  Cristina Buzea; Ivan I Pacheco; Kevin Robbie
Journal:  Biointerphases       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.456

8.  Continuous-flow leaching in a rotating coiled column for studies on the mobility of toxic elements in dust samples collected near a metallurgic plant.

Authors:  Petr S Fedotov; Mikhail S Ermolin; Alexandr I Ivaneev; Natalia N Fedyunina; Vasily K Karandashev; Yury G Tatsy
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  Particle-specific toxicity and bioavailability of cerium oxide (CeO2) nanoparticles to Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Xinping Yang; Haopeng Pan; Peng Wang; Fang-Jie Zhao
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 10.588

10.  Effects of uncoated and citric acid coated cerium oxide nanoparticles, bulk cerium oxide, cerium acetate, and citric acid on tomato plants.

Authors:  Ana Cecilia Barrios; Cyren M Rico; Jesica Trujillo-Reyes; Illya A Medina-Velo; Jose R Peralta-Videa; Jorge L Gardea-Torresdey
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 7.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.