Literature DB >> 31020319

LitSense: making sense of biomedical literature at sentence level.

Alexis Allot1, Qingyu Chen1, Sun Kim1, Roberto Vera Alvarez1, Donald C Comeau1, W John Wilbur1, Zhiyong Lu1.   

Abstract

Literature search is a routine practice for scientific studies as new discoveries build on knowledge from the past. Current tools (e.g. PubMed, PubMed Central), however, generally require significant effort in query formulation and optimization (especially in searching the full-length articles) and do not allow direct retrieval of specific statements, which is key for tasks such as comparing/validating new findings with previous knowledge and performing evidence attribution in biocuration. Thus, we introduce LitSense, which is the first web-based system that specializes in sentence retrieval for biomedical literature. LitSense provides unified access to PubMed and PMC content with over a half-billion sentences in total. Given a query, LitSense returns best-matching sentences using both a traditional term-weighting approach that up-weights sentences that contain more of the rare terms in the user query as well as a novel neural embedding approach that enables the retrieval of semantically relevant results without explicit keyword match. LitSense provides a user-friendly interface that assists its users to quickly browse the returned sentences in context and/or further filter search results by section or publication date. LitSense also employs PubTator to highlight biomedical entities (e.g. gene/proteins) in the sentences for better result visualization. LitSense is freely available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/research/litsense. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research 2019.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31020319      PMCID: PMC6602490          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  14 in total

1.  UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, the Manually Annotated Section of the UniProt KnowledgeBase: How to Use the Entry View.

Authors:  Emmanuel Boutet; Damien Lieberherr; Michael Tognolli; Michel Schneider; Parit Bansal; Alan J Bridge; Sylvain Poux; Lydie Bougueleret; Ioannis Xenarios
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2016

Review 2.  Literature mining for the biologist: from information retrieval to biological discovery.

Authors:  Lars Juhl Jensen; Jasmin Saric; Peer Bork
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  A passage retrieval method based on probabilistic information retrieval model and UMLS concepts in biomedical question answering.

Authors:  Mourad Sarrouti; Said Ouatik El Alaoui
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 4.  What does research reproducibility mean?

Authors:  Steven N Goodman; Daniele Fanelli; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Biocuration workflows and text mining: overview of the BioCreative 2012 Workshop Track II.

Authors:  Zhiyong Lu; Lynette Hirschman
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  The structural and content aspects of abstracts versus bodies of full text journal articles are different.

Authors:  K Bretonnel Cohen; Helen L Johnson; Karin Verspoor; Christophe Roeder; Lawrence E Hunter
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  GoPubMed: exploring PubMed with the Gene Ontology.

Authors:  Andreas Doms; Michael Schroeder
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Europe PMC: a full-text literature database for the life sciences and platform for innovation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  PubTator: a web-based text mining tool for assisting biocuration.

Authors:  Chih-Hsuan Wei; Hung-Yu Kao; Zhiyong Lu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Is searching full text more effective than searching abstracts?

Authors:  Jimmy Lin
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  7 in total

1.  Towards a unified search: Improving PubMed retrieval with full text.

Authors:  Won Kim; Lana Yeganova; Donald C Comeau; W John Wilbur; Zhiyong Lu
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 8.000

Review 2.  Cardiovascular informatics: building a bridge to data harmony.

Authors:  John Harry Caufield; Dibakar Sigdel; John Fu; Howard Choi; Vladimir Guevara-Gonzalez; Ding Wang; Peipei Ping
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 13.081

3.  Deep learning with sentence embeddings pre-trained on biomedical corpora improves the performance of finding similar sentences in electronic medical records.

Authors:  Qingyu Chen; Jingcheng Du; Sun Kim; W John Wilbur; Zhiyong Lu
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  BioConceptVec: Creating and evaluating literature-based biomedical concept embeddings on a large scale.

Authors:  Qingyu Chen; Kyubum Lee; Shankai Yan; Sun Kim; Chih-Hsuan Wei; Zhiyong Lu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Protocol for a reproducible experimental survey on biomedical sentence similarity.

Authors:  Alicia Lara-Clares; Juan J Lastra-Díaz; Ana Garcia-Serrano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Benchmarking Effectiveness and Efficiency of Deep Learning Models for Semantic Textual Similarity in the Clinical Domain: Validation Study.

Authors:  Qingyu Chen; Alex Rankine; Yifan Peng; Elaheh Aghaarabi; Zhiyong Lu
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2021-12-30

7.  Clinical language search algorithm from free-text: facilitating appropriate imaging.

Authors:  Gunvant R Chaudhari; Yeshwant R Chillakuru; Timothy L Chen; Valentina Pedoia; Thienkhai H Vu; Christopher P Hess; Youngho Seo; Jae Ho Sohn
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 1.930

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.