Literature DB >> 31020232

Ticagrelor-associated ventricular pauses: a case report and literature review.

Ashlea Low1, Kai'En Leong1,2, Anand Sharma1, Ernesto Oqueli1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor is an oral anti-platelet agent that is a reversible and direct inhibitor of the adenosine diphosphate P2Y12 receptor. Ticagrelor's brady-arrhythmic potential was investigated in a sub-study of the PLATO trial, which concluded that the effects were transient and not clinically significant beyond the acute initiation phase. Since then, there have been emerging reports of ticagrelor-associated high-degree heart block, requiring drug discontinuation and pacemaker insertion. We present a case of symptomatic ventricular pauses in a patient loaded with ticagrelor post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) and review the literature relating to ticagrelor and its brady-arrhythmic potential. CASE
SUMMARY: A 59-year-old female presented to our hospital with NSTEACS and received an oral load of ticagrelor 180 mg following PCI to her mid-left circumflex coronary artery. Three hours after, four pauses were observed on telemetry over a 20 min period, the longest being 18.5 s in duration. Ticagrelor was ceased and clopidogrel commenced in place. No arrhythmic events were recorded on loop recorder interrogation following ticagrelor discontinuation. DISCUSSION: The exact mechanism of ticagrelor-induced brady-arrhythmia is unclear, although inhibition of adenosine reuptake is proposed as likely due to structural similarities between ticagrelor and adenosine. In the setting of acute coronary syndrome treated with ticagrelor, extracellular adenosine concentrations are amplified by the ischaemic milieu with myocardial adenosine release and blunted cellular reuptake. This leads to enhanced agonism of adenosine A1 receptors, causing negative chronotropy and dromotropy. This case report highlights ticagrelor's brady-arrhythmic potential even in the absence of baseline conduction disease or concurrent confounding medications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute coronary syndrome; Brady-arrhythmia; Case report; Ticagrelor; Ventricular pauses

Year:  2018        PMID: 31020232      PMCID: PMC6439364          DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/yty156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep        ISSN: 2514-2119


For the podcast associated with this article, please visit https://academic.oup.com/ehjcr/pages/podcast

Learning points

Current ESC guidelines recommend the use of ticagrelor along with aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndrome regardless of initial treatment strategy. Ticagrelor can cause rare, brady-arrhythmic effects in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Augmented adenosine release in the ischaemic context, with blunted cellular re-uptake by Ticagrelor competition are likely culprit mechanisms, with downstream effects of negative dromo- and chronotropy. Patients with pre-existing conduction abnormalities may have a higher brady-arrhythmic risk, however, this case report highlights ticagrelor’s brady-arrhythmic potential even in the absence of baseline conduction disease or concurrent confounding medications.

Introduction

Dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) is the mainstay treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary disease. Ticagrelor is an oral anti-platelet agent that is a reversible and direct inhibitor of the adenosine diphosphate P2Y12 receptor. Unlike clopidogrel and prasugrel which require hepatic activation, ticagrelor, and its metabolite are biologically active following gastrointestinal absorption, have a more rapid onset of action and a higher degree of platelet inhibition. The PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial first demonstrated superiority of ticagrelor over clopidogrel when used in conjunction with aspirin, in reducing rates of cardiovascular death and recurrent myocardial infarction in patients with ACS. However, ticagrelor is associated with a greater risk of minor and major bleeding (including intracranial haemorrhage), brady-arrhythmias, and dyspnoea, which are major causes of medication discontinuation. A sub-study of the PLATO trial further explored the risk of brady-arrhythmias, and showed that ticagrelor (compared with clopidogrel) was associated with an increased risk of ventricular pauses of more than 3 s in the first week of treatment. Nonetheless, the study concluded that ticagrelor’s brady-arrhythmic potential was transient and not clinically significant beyond the acute initiation phase with no difference in rates of syncope or need for pacemaker insertion at follow-up. Since then, there have been emerging case reports of ticagrelor-associated high-degree heart block, requiring drug discontinuation and in some cases, pacemaker insertion (Table ). Summary of published case reports of ticagrelor-associated brady-arrhythmias Dizziness 2nd-degree Mobitz type 2 AV block Syncope Complete AV block and ventricular pause of 11 s Syncope 2:1 AV block Syncope Complete AV block AV: atrioventricular; DAPT: dual anti-platelet therapy; LAD: left anterior descending coronary artery; LBBB: left bundle branch block; LCx: left circumflex coronary artery; LM: left main coronary artery; NSTEACS: non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome; RBBB: right bundle branch block; RCA: right coronary artery; STEMI: ST-elevation myocardial infarction. We present a case of symptomatic ventricular pauses in a patient loaded with ticagrelor post-PCI for non-ST elevation ACS (NSTEACS) and review the literature relating to ticagrelor and its brady-arrhythmic potential.

Timeline

No further ticagrelor given after loading dose; clopidogrel commenced in place Normal echocardiogram No further events on telemetry; temporary pacing wire removed

Case presentation

A 59-year-old female with no prior cardiac diagnosis presented to our hospital with 3 days of intermittent chest pain. Her cardiac risk factors included hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, elevated body mass index, and impaired glucose tolerance. Her medical history was also significant for asthma, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and depression. Cardiovascular examination was unremarkable with no signs of heart failure. Her admission electrocardiogram (ECG) showed sinus rhythm, normal axis, narrow QRS (80 ms) with no ischaemic change or conduction defects (Figure ). The patient’s serum troponin recorded a peak measurement of 0.31 µg/L (cTnI n < 0.04 µg/L). Her biochemistry and blood panels were otherwise unremarkable with normal renal and liver function. Echocardiography showed normal biventricular size and systolic function, with normal valves. Baseline electrocardiogram. Radial approach coronary angiography was performed and the culprit vessel was shown to be the left circumflex artery (non-dominant) with a long 80% stenosis in the mid-portion. This was treated with deployment of a Synergy 3.0 ×24 mm drug eluting stent and restoration of TIMI 3 flow (Figure ). Medical management was elected for the patient’s residual moderate diffuse left anterior descending artery disease. The right coronary artery was non-obstructed. Mid-left circumflex artery culprit stenosis—pre- (left) and post-percutaneous coronary intervention (right). At conclusion of the procedure, an oral load of ticagrelor 180 mg was administered. Three hours after, whilst convalescing in the coronary care unit, she began complaining of dyspnoea and four pauses were observed on telemetry over a 20 min period (Figure ), the longest being 18.5 s in duration (Figure ). Correspondingly, the patient had intermittent lapses of consciousness and underwent emergency right femoral venous temporary pacing wire insertion. Ventricular pauses of 3 s. N: normal beat; M: missed beat. Rhythm strip showing ventricular pause of 18.5 s between arrows marked (1) and (2). Ticagrelor was considered as the probable cause for the pauses, for that reason no additional ticagrelor was given after the loading dose and clopidogrel was commenced in place. No further brady-arrhythmias were detected in the subsequent 24 h and the un-utilized temporary pacing wire was removed. The patient was also discharged with aspirin, atorvastatin, perindopril, and amlodipine. A loop recorder (Medtronic Reveal LINQ) was implanted. Beta-blocker therapy was not prescribed in view of preceding events. Notably, there had not been a prior personal or family history of syncope. No cardiorespiratory symptoms were raised during regular follow-up over 12 months with no arrhythmic events recorded on loop recorder interrogation.

Discussion

We present a case of symptomatic ventricular pauses in a patient loaded with ticagrelor post-PCI for NSTEACS. Ticagrelor is rapidly absorbed with 36% bioavailability, reaching peak plasma concentration 1.5 h after oral dosing and achieving peak (90%) inhibition of platelet aggregation at 2 h following a loading dose of 180 mg. Elimination is via the liver with a half-life of approximately 7 h. The 2017 European Society of Cardiology focused update on DAPT in coronary artery disease recommends the use of ticagrelor along with aspirin in patients with ACS regardless of initial treatment strategy. Several factors in our case suggest ticagrelor culpability. The patient did not have any baseline ECG conduction abnormalities or personal/family history of syncope. There was no concurrent use of medications with negative dromo/chronotropic potential. Bradycardic symptom onset was 3 h following oral ticagrelor loading, consistent with its anticipated drug peak plasma concentration. Lastly, there was no acute or late brady-arrhythmic recurrence with discontinuation of ticagrelor. The exact mechanism of ticagrelor-induced brady-arrhythmia is unclear, although inhibition of adenosine reuptake is proposed as likely. Extracellular adenosine has a half-life of several seconds due to rapid cellular uptake through sodium independent equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENTs) and sodium dependent concentrative nucleoside transporters (CNTs). ENTs are ubiquitous, present on erythrocytes as well as the liver, heart, spleen, kidneys, lungs, intestines, and brain, while CNTs are found primarily in the liver, kidneys, and small intestine. Ticagrelor shares structural similarity with adenosine, binding to ENT1 receptors on erythrocytes, and competitively inhibiting cellular adenosine uptake. Three adenosine receptor subtypes (A1, A2a, and A3) have cardiac expression with agonism resulting in bradycardia, coronary vasodilatation, and activation of multifaceted cardio-protective mechanisms, respectively., The earliest coronary response to myocardial ischaemia of any aetiology is vasodilatation; mediated by A2a receptors on vascular smooth muscle cells and adenosine release from the ischaemic myocardium. In the setting of ACS treated with ticagrelor, extracellular adenosine concentrations are amplified both by the ischaemic milieu with myocardial adenosine release and blunted cellular reuptake. This leads to enhanced agonism of adenosine A1 receptors, highly expressed in cardiac conduction tissue, causing negative chronotropy via suppression of sinoatrial node automaticity and negative dromotropy via impulse conduction delay at the atrioventricular node. Table summarizes 10 published case reports of ticagrelor-associated brady-arrhythmia. All cases occurred in patients with ACS. Notably, 7 of 10 patients had pre-exisiting conduction disease on baseline ECG, with concurrent beta-blocker therapy in most. Ticagrelor was ceased in all patients and substituted with either clopidogrel or prasugrel. Two patients with pre-morbid ECG conduction abnormalities required permanent pacemaker insertion due to persistence of heart block despite discontinuation of ticagrelor. In conclusion, we present a case of symptomatic and profound ventricular pauses in a patient loaded with ticagrelor post-PCI for NSTEACS. This was observed in our patient even in the absence of baseline conduction disease or concurrent confounding medications, unlike most cases in the published literature (Table ), and highlights the need for broader awareness of ticagrelor’s not-insignificant brady-arrhythmic potential.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at European Heart Journal - Case Reports online. Slide sets: A fully edited slide set detailing this case and suitable for local presentation is available online as Supplementary data. Consent: The authors confirm that written consent for submission and publication of this case report including image(s) and associated text has been obtained from the patient in line with COPE guidance. Conflict of interest: none declared. Click here for additional data file.
Table 1

Summary of published case reports of ticagrelor-associated brady-arrhythmias

CasesIndication for ticagrelorBaseline ECGPre-existing medicationsTime from ticagrelor administration to symptoms/arrhythmiaSymptoms/ECGOutcomes
Sharma et al.755-year-old male with unstable angina; PCI to LCxSinus rhythm, borderline 1st-degree AV block, RBBBMetoprolol2 months

Dizziness

2nd-degree Mobitz type 2 AV block

Ticagrelor ceased; 2nd-degree AV block resolved after 2 days; clopidogrel commenced; and discharged with loop recorder
Yurtdas and Ozdemir847-year-old female with NSTEACS; PCI to LCxSinus rhythm, infero-lateral ST depressionNil2 daysComplete AV blockTicagrelor ceased; complete AV block resolved after 2 days; prasugrel commenced; and nil events at 3 months
Goldberg et al.952-year-old male with NSTEACS; PCI to distal LM and ramus intermediusRBBBBisoprolol4 h

Syncope

Complete AV block and ventricular pause of 11 s

Temporary pacing wire inserted; ticagrelor ceased; heart block resolved after 4 days; clopidogrel commenced; and no recurrence at 6 months
Nicol et al.1039-year-old male with anterior STEMI; PCI to LADST elevation in leads V1-4Atenolol1 hVentricular pause of 8 sBeta-blocker discontinued; and unclear if ticagrelor was continued
Ünlü et al.11ACS; PCI to LCxFirst-degree AV blockBisoprolol4 daysMobitz type II AV blockBisoprolol and ticagrelor ceased; AV block persisted after 10 days; and dual-chamber PPM inserted
Baker et al.1256-year-old male with NSTEACS, PCI to proximal LADSinus rhythm, no conduction abnormalitiesNil3 hSinus bradycardia followed by sinus arrest and complete heart blockTicagrelor ceased; temporary pacing wire inserted then removed 12 h later; and asymptomatic at 4 weeks
De Maria et al.1382-year-old male with NSTEACS; PCI to LADFirst-degree AV blockBisoprolol2–3 days

Syncope

2:1 AV block

Bisoprolol ceased, episodes persisted, ticagrelor ceased, and no further events at 6 months
De Maria et al.1376-year-old male with NSTEACS; PCI to LCxRBBB, left anterior fascicular block and borderline 1st-degree AV blockNilWithin 2 weeks

Syncope

Complete AV block

Ticagrelor ceased; prasugrel commenced; brady-arrhythmia persisted; and dual-chamber PPM inserted
Ozturk et al.1462-year-old male with NSTEACS; stent to RCAFirst-degree AV blockMetoprolol7 hMobitz type II AV blockTicagrelor and metoprolol ceased; AV block resolved on day 3; and no further events after 1 month
Goldberg et al.1571-year-old female with NSTEACS; PCI to proximal LADLBBBBisoprolol2 days, 3 h after bisoprolol (new)Syncope complete AV block with ventricular pauseTicagrelor and bisoprolol ceased; temp wire inserted; and no recurrence at 6 months

AV: atrioventricular; DAPT: dual anti-platelet therapy; LAD: left anterior descending coronary artery; LBBB: left bundle branch block; LCx: left circumflex coronary artery; LM: left main coronary artery; NSTEACS: non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome; RBBB: right bundle branch block; RCA: right coronary artery; STEMI: ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

TimeProgress
Day 11120Coronary angiography and left circumflex percutaneous coronary intervention
1330Oral 180 mg ticagrelor load; transfer to coronary care unit
1545Onset of dyspnoea
1632Intermittent ventricular pauses of up to 3 s observed on telemetry
1653Patient found unresponsive; corresponding 18.5 s ventricular pause on telemetry
1900Temporary pacing wire inserted; no pacing requirement or brady-arrhythmic recurrence post
Day 2

No further ticagrelor given after loading dose; clopidogrel commenced in place

Normal echocardiogram

No further events on telemetry; temporary pacing wire removed

Day 3Discharged home after insertion of an implantable loop recorder
  15 in total

1.  Atrioventricular block associated with ticagrelor therapy may require permanent pacemaker.

Authors:  Murat Ünlü; Sait Demirkol; Ali Osman Yildirim; Şevket Balta; Cengiz Öztürk; Atila Iyisoy
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Ticagrelor therapy in patients with advanced conduction disease: Is it really safe?

Authors:  Alexander Goldberg; Inna Rosenfeld; Irena Nordkin; Majdi Halabi
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  The progressed atrioventricular block associated with ticagrelor therapy may not require permanent pacemaker after acute coronary syndrome; it may be reversible.

Authors:  Cengiz Ozturk; Murat Unlu; Ali Osman Yildirim; Sıddık Erdogan; Mustafa Demir; Sevket Balta; Sait Demirkol; Turgay Celik; Atila Iyisoy
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 4.  Adenosine-mediated effects of ticagrelor: evidence and potential clinical relevance.

Authors:  Marco Cattaneo; Rainer Schulz; Sven Nylander
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Side effects of ticagrelor: Sinus node dysfunction with ventricular pause.

Authors:  Martin Nicol; Julien Deblaise; Rémi Choussat; Olivier Dubourg; Nicolas Mansencal
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Life-threatening complete atrioventricular block associated with ticagrelor therapy.

Authors:  Alexander Goldberg; Inna Rosenfeld; Irena Nordkin; Majdi Halabi
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 4.164

7.  Clinically significant ticagrelor induced conduction abnormalities following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Nevin C Baker; Wadih Nadour; Mati Friehling
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  The incidence of bradyarrhythmias and clinical bradyarrhythmic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial: results of the continuous electrocardiographic assessment substudy.

Authors:  Benjamin M Scirica; Christopher P Cannon; Håkan Emanuelsson; Eric L Michelson; Robert A Harrington; Steen Husted; Stefan James; Hugo Katus; Prem Pais; Dimitar Raev; Jindrich Spinar; Ph Gabriel Steg; Robert F Storey; Lars Wallentin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Lars Wallentin; Richard C Becker; Andrzej Budaj; Christopher P Cannon; Håkan Emanuelsson; Claes Held; Jay Horrow; Steen Husted; Stefan James; Hugo Katus; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Benjamin M Scirica; Allan Skene; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Robert F Storey; Robert A Harrington; Anneli Freij; Mona Thorsén
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Ticagrelor: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, and safety.

Authors:  Paul P Dobesh; Julie H Oestreich
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 4.705

View more
  3 in total

1.  A rare but serious complication of ticagrelor therapy: a case report.

Authors:  Manfredi Arioti; Giovanni Sirianni; Maria Luisa Laudisa; Nicoletta Bianca De Cesare
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2020-08-20

2.  Prolonged ventricular pause associated with ticagrelor use: A case report.

Authors:  Alaa Rahhal; Amer Aljundi; Sara Saeed Ibrahim Mohamed; Muhammad Awais Arif; Abdul Rahman Arabi
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2021-10-25

3.  A case report of unusually long episodes of asystole in a severe COVID-19 patient treated with a leadless pacemaker.

Authors:  Ivan Cakulev; Jayakumar Sahadevan; Mohammed Najeeb Osman
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2020-07-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.