| Literature DB >> 31020001 |
Jacquelyn E Braggin1, Stephanie A Bucks1, Meredith M Course2, Carole L Smith1, Bryce Sopher1, Leah Osnis1, Kiel D Shuey1, Kimiko Domoto-Reilly1, Christina Caso1, Chizuru Kinoshita3, Kathryn P Scherpelz4, Chloe Cross5, Thomas Grabowski1,6, Seyyed H M Nik7, Morgan Newman7, Gwenn A Garden1,4, James B Leverenz8, Debby Tsuang1,2,9,10, Caitlin Latimer4, Luis F Gonzalez-Cuyar4, Christopher Dirk Keene4, Richard S Morrison3, Kristoffer Rhoads1, Ellen M Wijsman2,11, Michael O Dorschner4,9,12, Michael Lardelli7, Jessica E Young4, Paul N Valdmanis2, Thomas D Bird1,2,10, Suman Jayadev1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Autosomal-dominant familial Alzheimer disease (AD) is caused by by variants in presenilin 1 (PSEN1), presenilin 2 (PSEN2), and amyloid precursor protein (APP). Previously, we reported a rare PSEN2 frameshift variant in an early-onset AD case (PSEN2 p.K115Efs*11). In this study, we characterize a second family with the same variant and analyze cellular transcripts from both patient fibroblasts and brain lysates.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31020001 PMCID: PMC6469258 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.755
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol ISSN: 2328-9503 Impact factor: 4.511
Primers
| Sanger sequencing | |
| Forward (with M13 tail) | TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGTCATCCAGCTCCAAATCTTCTCTACT |
| Reverse (with M13 tail) | CAGGAAACAGCTATGACCCTGGTGTGGAGCTGCAGGTAC |
| Digital droplet PCR | |
| PSEN2 WT, sense (5′→3′) | TGTGCGCTTCTACACAGAGAAGAAT |
| PSEN2 WT, anti‐sense (5′→3′) | CGAGGGTGTGTCCTCAGTGAA |
| PSEN2 K115Efs*11, sense (5′→3′) | TGTGCGCTTCTACACAGAAGAAT |
| PSEN2 K115Efs*11, anti‐sense (5′→3′) | CGAGGGTGTGTCCTCAGTGAA |
Summary of neuropsychological measures at baseline for Family B: case 2
| Age at testing | 42 |
| WTAR estimate of premorbid intelligence | 31 (39th %ile) |
| MoCA (max = 30) |
|
| CDR total | 0.5 |
| CDR sum of boxes | 0.5 |
| Learning and memory | |
| Benson Complex Figure Delayed Recall (max = 17); recognition | 13; yes (46th %ile) |
| Craft Story 21 | |
| Immediate recall –verbatim (max = 44) | 16 |
| Immediate recall –paraphrased (max = 25) | 13 |
| Delayed recall –verbatim (max = 44) | 8 |
| Delayed recall –paraphrased (max = 25) | 8 |
| Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test | |
| Trial 1 total correct (max = 15) | 5 |
| Trial 5 total correct (max = 15) | 14 (81st %ile) |
| Trials 1–5 total correct (max = 75) | 51 (49th %ile) |
| Trial B total correct (max = 15) | 7 (68th %ile) |
| Trial 6 total correct (max = 15) | 11 (59th %ile) |
| 20′ free recall (max = 15) | 9 (33rd %ile) |
| 20′ recognition hits (max = 15) | 13 |
| 20′ recognition false positives | 2 |
| Attention, processing speed, and executive functioning | |
| Trail Making Part A | 20″ (45th %ile) |
| Trail Making Part B | 48″ (46th %ile) |
| Span of digits forward (max = 9) | 7 (56th %ile) |
| Span of digits backward (max = 8) | 7 (89th %ile) |
| Letter Number Sequencing (max = 21) | 12 (75th %ile) |
| WAIS‐R Digit Symbol (max = 93) | 68 (85th %ile) |
| Stroop (Golden) Word; errors | 92, 0 |
| Stroop (Golden) Color; errors | 81, 0 (61st %ile) |
| Stroop (Golden) Color‐Word Interference; errors | 42, 1 (50th %ile) |
| Language functioning | |
| Repetition (max = 2) | 1 |
| Multilingual naming test (max = 32) | 28 |
| FL verbal fluency (# words) | 28 (38th %ile) |
| Animals/minute | 28 (74th %ile) |
| Vegetables/minute | 18 (52nd %ile) |
| Visuospatial functioning | |
| Cube copy (max = 1) | 0 |
| Benson Complex Figure Copy (max = 17) | 15 (26th %ile) |
| Benton Judgment of Line Orientation (15 item) | 14 (80th %ile) |
All scores represented as raw scores (percentile), with bold/italic text indicating that performance in the low average or impaired range compared to people of the same age, sex, and level of education. Limitation of the adjusted normative data for UDS measures is the small sample of same‐aged subjects enrolled in NACC.
CDR, Clinical Demenita Rating; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; NACC, National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center; UDS, Uniform Data Set; WTAR, Wechsler Test of Adult Reading.
Figure 1Family A: Proband; Neuropathologic staging. (A–C) IHC stain for PHF‐tau showing increased Tau burden characterized by neurofibrillary tangles and Tau neurites. (A) Frontal lobe (40×). (B) Hilus (40×). (C) Visual cortex (40×). (D–F) IHC for β‐amyloid demonstrates widespread amyloid plaques. (D) Frontal lobe (1.25×). (E) Putamen (20×). (F) Cerebellum (4×). (G) Bielschowsky stain of frontal lobe (10×) showing frequent neuritic plaques. (H) H&E/LFB stain of CA1 region (60×). Black open arrows – neurofibrillary tangles, black closed arrow – granulovacuolar degeneration, and white open arrow – Hirano body. (I) H&E/LFB of frontal lobe (1.25×) showing diffuse white matter involvement. Family B: Proband; Neuropathologic staging. (A–C) IHC stain for PHF‐tau showing increased Tau burden characterized by neurofibrillary tangles and Tau neurites. (A) Frontal lobe (40×). (B) Hilus (40×). (C) Visual cortex (40×). (D–F) IHC for β‐amyloid demonstrates widespread amyloid plaques. (D) Frontal lobe (1.25×). (E) Putamen (20×). (F) Cerebellum (4×). Black open arrow – amyloid angiopathy. (G) Bielschowsky stain of frontal lobe (10×) showing frequent neuritic plaques. (H) H&E/LFB stain of CA1 region (40×). Black open arrows – neurofibrillary tangles, black closed arrow – granulovacuolar degeneration, and white open arrow – “ghost tangle.” (I) H&E/LFB of frontal lobe (1.25×) showing that the white matter is much less affected as compared to the first case. IHC, Immunohistochemical; PHF‐tau, paired helical filament tau; H&E/LFB, hematoxylin and eosin with Luxol fast blue.
Figure 2Fibroblast PSEN2 sequencing, transcript analysis, and protein expression. (A) Chromatogram from Sanger sequencing of Family B: Case 2. Top panel, control fibroblasts; bottom panel, PSEN2 K115Efs*11 fibroblasts. Light blue highlights the bases prior to and including the two base‐pair GA deletion (underlined in control fibroblast sequence). (B) Illustration generated by Protter program simulation (http://wlab.ethz.ch/protter/start/) to demonstrate the consequences of frameshift and premature termination codon in PSEN2 K115Efs*11 compared to wild‐type PS2. Dark green indicates frameshift. (C) Values and confidence intervals derived from dPCR analysis of fibroblast cDNA to compare transcript copy number between two independent wild‐type cell lines and PSEN2 K115Efs*11. (D) Western blot comparing wild‐type PS2N‐ and C‐terminal fragment expression with PSEN2 K115Efs*11; note the absence of signal in the expected range for a truncated protein due to PSEN2 K115Efs*11. (E) Quantification of both N‐ and C‐terminal PS2 fragments. Unpaired t‐test: P = 0.0008 (C‐terminus); N‐terminus P < 0.0001. Number of replicated experiments: n = 4. PSEN2, presenilin 1; dPCR, digital polymerase chain reaction. ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001.
Figure 3Analysis of the products of APP cleavage by PS2. Secreted Aβ 1–40 from conditioned media collected from wild‐type, PSEN2 K115Efs*11, or PSEN2 N141I fibroblasts was analyzed at three independent time points using Meso Scale Discovery Assay, (Rockville, MD) analysis and normalized to protein concentration from each sample. Sidak statistical analyses: in comparison to WT at 24 h, P = 0.0059 (**) and P = 0.0001 (***) for PSEN2 K115fs and PSEN1 N141I, respectively. At 48 h, P = 0.0005 (***) and P < 0.0001 (****) for PSEN2 K115fs and PSEN1 N141I, respectively. At 72 h, P = 0.0405 (*) and P = 0.0015 (**) for PSEN2 K115fs and PSEN1 N141I, respectively. APP, amyloid precursor protein; PSEN2, presenilin 1.
Figure 4Consequences of alternative splicing. (A) Schematic demonstrating the predicted outcome of alternative splicing with or without the presence of PSEN2 K115Efs*11. (B) PSEN2 K115Efs*11‐specific predicted addition of 25 amino acids (consequence of 77 base‐pair partial intronic retention) or deletion of 48 amino acids (consequence of exon 6 exclusion) after the first PS2 transmembrane domain (generated with the Protter program simulation, http://wlab.ethz.ch/protter/start/).46 Dark green indicates frameshift, while purple indicates the region of 25 inserted amino acids.
Figure 5Alternative transcripts are present in brain‐specific lysates. Top: PCR amplification of cDNA from brain lysates between exons 5 and 7 show two alternatively spliced products above and below a main PSEN2 band. Bottom: RT‐PCR quantification of alternatively spliced products. RT‐PCR, real‐time polymerase chain reaction; PSEN2, presenilin 1.
Figure 6Western blot of brain lysates. Wild‐type PS2 protein is detected by both N‐ and C‐terminal antibodies.