| Literature DB >> 31019870 |
Nikolay Klenov1,2,3, Yury Khaydukov1,4,5, Sergey Bakurskiy1,2, Roman Morari6, Igor Soloviev1,2, Vladimir Boian6, Thomas Keller4,5, Mikhail Kupriyanov1,2,7, Anatoli Sidorenko6, Bernhard Keimer4.
Abstract
We present a study of magnetic structures with controllable effective exchange energy for Josephson switches and memory applications. As a basis for a weak link we propose to use a periodic structure composed of ferromagnetic (F) layers spaced by thin superconductors (s). Our calculations based on the Usadel equations show that switching from parallel (P) to antiparallel (AP) alignment of neighboring F layers can lead to a significant enhancement of the critical current through the junction. To control the magnetic alignment we propose to use a periodic system whose unit cell is a pseudo spin valve of structure F1/s/F2/s where F1 and F2 are two magnetic layers having different coercive fields. In order to check the feasibility of controllable switching between AP and P states through the whole periodic structure, we prepared a superlattice [Co(1.5 nm)/Nb(8 nm)/Co(2.5 nm)/Nb(8 nm)]6 between two superconducting layers of Nb(25 nm). Neutron scattering and magnetometry data showed that parallel and antiparallel alignment can be controlled with a magnetic field of only several tens of Oersted.Entities:
Keywords: cryogenic computing; neutron scattering; spin valve; superconducting spintronics
Year: 2019 PMID: 31019870 PMCID: PMC6466729 DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.10.83
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Nanotechnol ISSN: 2190-4286 Impact factor: 3.649
Figure 1The normalized critical current of the S/F/s/F/S (solid lines) and S/F/N/F/S (dashed lines) structures as a function of the thickness of the spacing layer (a) and the dimensionless magnitude of the temperature (b). The red lines correspond to the case when the exchange energies in both layers of the ferromagnet are equal in magnitude, and the magnetization vectors lying in the plane of the magnetic layers are parallel (P). The blue lines are for the case when the exchange energies, E, in both F-layers are equal, and the described magnetization vectors are antiparallel (AP). The black curves correspond to the E = 0 case.
Figure 2(a) The depth profile of the superconducting pair potential amplitude of the S/[F1/s/F2/s]5/F1/S structure in the P and AP cases. (b) The amplitudes of the superconducting pair potential in the middle of the weak link for the same situations. Inset – schematic representation of the considered stack structure.
Figure 3Experimental (dots) specular neutron reflectivity measured at T = 13 K in magnetic fields H = 300 Oe (a) and H = 30 Oe (b). Solid lines show the model curves for the magnetization depth profiles depicted in Figure 4a. The inset in (a) shows the sketch of the sample and experimental setup. The numbers above show the corresponding order of Bragg reflection from the effective [Co(2 nm)/Nb(8 nm)] × 12 periodic structure. The inset in (b) shows the field dependence of the j = 1/2 peak shown by the blue rectangle in (b). The logarithm of intensity of spin-down scattered neutrons measured at H = 300 Oe and H = 30 Oe is shown in (c) and (d).
Figure 4(a) Magnetic depth profiles of one unit cell for the P (black) and AP (red) alignment. Corresponding neutron curves are shown by solid lines in Figure 3a. (b) Hysteresis loop measured by SQUID magnetometry (solid line). The black dot indicates the magnetic moment of the sample which is obtained by the integration of the depth profiles depicted in (a). The red dot shows the magnetic moment at H = 30 Oe expected if one P segment were present in the AP aligned structure.