| Literature DB >> 31019684 |
David Allaway1, Matt Gilham1, Antje Wagner-Golbs2, Sandra González Maldonado3, Richard Haydock1, Alison Colyer1, Jonathan Stockman1, Phillip Watson1.
Abstract
Short-term feeding studies have highlighted a phenomenon in Ca regulation that raises concerns around Ca absorption in dogs that may make an impact on commercial diets near to the maximum recommended level. A recent study to determine responses in dogs fed one of two diets differing in dietary Ca over 40 weeks found no evidence to suggest a concern across a range of biological parameters hypothesised to be affected by Ca. Unforeseen consequences of dietary Ca could have occurred and metabolic profiling was deemed a suitable data-driven approach to identify effects of dietary Ca. The objectives were to compare the fasted plasma metabolome (sampled at 8-week intervals over 40 weeks) of dogs fed one of two diets, near to the minimum and maximum recommended levels of dietary Ca. Comparisons with the control diet were also investigated across the postprandial time course (1-4 h) following acute (1 d) and long-term (24 weeks) feeding of the test diet. Comparing fasted plasma samples at each time point, no significant effect (adjusted P < 0·05) of diet on metabolites was observed. In the postprandial state, only phosphate was consistently different between diets and was explained by additional dietary P to maintain Ca:P. Metabolic profiling analysis supports the view that the dietary Ca upper limit is safe. Additionally, the canine plasma metabolome was characterised, providing insights into the stability of individual profiles across 40 weeks, the response to consumption of a nutritionally complete meal over a 4 h postprandial time course and different kinetic categories of postprandial absorption.Entities:
Keywords: BW, body weight; Canine nutrition; Individual metabolomes; Nutritional metabolomics; Postprandial metabolomes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31019684 PMCID: PMC6465680 DOI: 10.1017/jns.2019.12
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Sci ISSN: 2048-6790
Metabolites with significant fold changes (ratios) between the T6 and T7 time points and T1 (control diet)
(Mean values and standard deviations)
| Fasted, test diet group | Fasted, control diet group | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contrast… | T6 | T7 | T6 | T7 | |||||
| Ontology | Metabolite | Mean | 95 % CI | Mean | 95 % CI | Mean | 95 % CI | Mean | 95 % CI |
| Amino acids, aromatic | Tryptophan† | 0·84* | 0·76, 0·94 | 0·89 | 0·79, 1 | 1·09 | 0·97, 1·23 | 1·09 | 0·96, 1·23 |
| Amino acids, basic | Asparagine | 1·21* | 1·06, 1·39 | 1·28* | 1·11, 1·48 | 1·06 | 0·91, 1·23 | 1·18 | 1·02, 1·38 |
| Amino acids, basic | Lysine | 1·28** | 1·14, 1·43 | 1·24* | 1·11, 1·39 | 1·02 | 0·9, 1·15 | 1·05 | 0·93, 1·19 |
| Amino acids, branched chain | Isoleucine | 1·09 | 0·99, 1·21 | 1·20* | 1·08, 1·33 | 1·09 | 0·98, 1·22 | 1·11 | 0·99, 1·24 |
| Amino acids, branched chain | Leucine | 1·12 | 1·02, 1·23 | 1·21** | 1·1, 1·33 | 1·04 | 0·94, 1·16 | 1·05 | 0·94, 1·16 |
| Amino acids, branched chain | Valine | 1·12* | 1·03, 1·22 | 1·17* | 1·08, 1·27 | 1·05 | 0·96, 1·15 | 1·04 | 0·95, 1·14 |
| Amino acids, neutral | Alanine | 1·34** | 1·19, 1·5 | 1·26** | 1·12, 1·41 | 1·16 | 1·02, 1·31 | 1·09 | 0·96, 1·23 |
| Amino acids, neutral | Serine | 1·20* | 1·08, 1·34 | 1·20* | 1·07, 1·33 | 1·02 | 0·91, 1·14 | 1·00 | 0·89, 1·13 |
| Amino acids, neutral | Threonine | 1·28* | 1·12, 1·45 | 1·24* | 1·09, 1·41 | 1·18 | 1·02, 1·35 | 1·08 | 0·94, 1·24 |
| Urea cycle and related | Ornithine (additional: arginine, citrulline) | 1·21* | 1·09, 1·35 | 1·25** | 1·12, 1·39 | 1·08 | 0·97, 1·22 | 1·30** | 1·15, 1·46 |
| Methyl cycle | Sarcosine | 0·81* | 0·71, 0·91 | 0·79** | 0·7, 0·89 | 0·97 | 0·85, 1·11 | 0·99 | 0·86, 1·13 |
| Miscellaneous | Phosphate (inorganic and from organic phosphates) | 0·85* | 0·77, 0·93 | 0·85* | 0·77, 0·94 | 1·07 | 0·96, 1·18 | 1·08 | 0·97, 1·19 |
| Citrate cycle | Isocitrate | 1·08 | 0·95, 1·22 | 1·22* | 1·07, 1·38 | 1·01 | 0·89, 1·16 | 1·02 | 0·89, 1·17 |
| PUFA | Docosatetraenoic acid (C22:cis(7,10,13,16)4) | 0·73* | 0·62, 0·85 | 0·70** | 0·59, 0·83 | 0·74* | 0·63, 0·87 | 0·79 | 0·67, 0·94 |
| PUFA | EPA (C20:cis(5,8,11,14,17)5) | 1·21* | 1·07, 1·38 | 1·35** | 1·19, 1·54 | 1·52** | 1·31, 1·76 | 1·28* | 1·1, 1·48 |
| Lysophosphatidylcholines | Lysophosphatidylcholine (C18 : 2) | 1·12 | 1, 1·24 | 1·21* | 1·09, 1·35 | 1·24* | 1·11, 1·4 | 1·23* | 1·09, 1·39 |
| Plasmalogens | Choline plasmalogen (C18, C20 : 4) | 0·94* | 0·91, 0·97 | 0·94* | 0·91, 0·98 | 1·01 | 0·98, 1·05 | 0·98 | 0·94, 1·01 |
| Plasmalogens | Ethanolamine plasmalogen (C39 : 4) (additional: choline plasmalogen (C36 : 4)) | 0·91** | 0·87, 0·95 | 0·91** | 0·87, 0·95 | 0·98 | 0·93, 1·03 | 0·96 | 0·91, 1·01 |
| Unknown lipid | Unknown lipid (69600020) | 0·91** | 0·87, 0·95 | 0·89** | 0·84, 0·93 | 0·99 | 0·94, 1·04 | 0·96 | 0·91, 1·01 |
| Unknown lipid | Unknown lipid (69600024) | 1·34* | 1·15, 1·56 | 1·36** | 1·16, 1·59 | 1·35* | 1·14, 1·6 | 1·32* | 1·12, 1·57 |
Significant, relative to T1: * P <0·05, ** P <0·01.
† Tryptophan was also included (though significant only at T6) as it is relevant to the discussion of amino acid metabolism.
Fig. 1.Principal components (PC) analysis (PCA) visualisation of PC1 and PC2 of fasted samples from all sampling time points in the test diet group (a) (T1–T7) and control diet group (b) (T1, T3–T7), with individuals represented by unique symbols and sampling occasions represented by unique colours. PCA calculated on original data (i.e. not corrected for random factor dog).
Metabolites with >2-fold percentage standard deviation related to inter-individual difference
| Ontology | Metabolite | Inter | Intra | Inter:intra proportion | Occasion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | Sphingomyelin (d18 : 1, C23 : 0) | 0·002 | <0·001 | 0·865:0·135 | 0·031 |
| Amino acids related | Kynurenic acid | 0·061 | 0·010 | 0·863:0·137 | 0·009 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | Arachidonic acid (C20:cis(5,8,1114)4)* | 0·011 | 0·002 | 0·859:0·141 | 0·000 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | Linoleic acid (C18:cis(9,12)2)* | 0·014 | 0·003 | 0·828:0·172 | 0·055 |
| Carbohydrates and related | scyllo-Inositol | 0·011 | 0·002 | 0·825:0·175 | 0·867 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | Stearic acid (C18 : 0)* | 0·008 | 0·002 | 0·823:0·177 | 0·063 |
| Energy metabolism and related | 3-Hydroxybutyrate | 0·066 | 0·015 | 0·814:0·186 | 0·014 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | Cholesterol, total* | 0·012 | 0·003 | 0·812:0·188 | 0·214 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | Ethanolamine plasmalogen (C39 : 5) (additional: choline plasmalogen (C36 : 5)) | 0·003 | 0·001 | 0·809:0·191 | 0·056 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | Sphingomyelin (d18 : 1, C24 : 0) | 0·002 | 0·000 | 0·806:0·194 | 0·464 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | Lignoceric acid (C24 : 0)* | 0·012 | 0·003 | 0·798:0·202 | 0·007 |
| Carbohydrates and related | 1,5-Anhydrosorbitol | 0·014 | 0·004 | 0·777:0·223 | 0·779 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | Nervonic acid (C24:cis(15)1)* | 0·010 | 0·003 | 0·776:0·224 | 0·062 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | Behenic acid (C22 : 0)* | 0·008 | 0·002 | 0·771:0·229 | 0·077 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | Cholestenol no. 02* | 0·011 | 0·003 | 0·769:0·231 | 0·187 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | Palmitic acid (C16 : 0)* | 0·005 | 0·002 | 0·769:0·231 | 0·076 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | Dihomo-γ-linolenic acid (C20:cis(8,1114)3) | 0·006 | 0·002 | 0·768:0·232 | 0·004 |
| Amino acids related | Creatine | 0·034 | 0·010 | 0·765:0·235 | 0·262 |
| Miscellaneous | Campesterol* | 0·021 | 0·006 | 0·765:0·235 | 0·006 |
| Amino acids | Tryptophan* | 0·009 | 0·003 | 0·744:0·256 | 0·587 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | Docosapentaenoic acid (C22:cis(7,10,13,1619)5) | 0·009 | 0·003 | 0·744:0·256 | 0·423 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | Tricosanoic acid (C23 : 0)* | 0·013 | 0·005 | 0·744:0·256 | 0·000 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | 4-Hydroxysphinganine (t18 : 0, phytosphingosine), total | 0·018 | 0·006 | 0·74:0·26 | 0·606 |
| Amino acids | Serine | 0·006 | 0·002 | 0·727:0·273 | 0·004 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | Glycerol phosphate, lipid fraction* | 0·013 | 0·005 | 0·72:0·28 | 0·227 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | Oleic acid (C18:cis(9)1)* | 0·005 | 0·002 | 0·711:0·289 | 0·704 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | Phosphatidylcholine (C16 : 1, C18 : 2)* | 0·001 | 0·000 | 0·707:0·293 | 0·969 |
| Amino acids related | Citrulline* | 0·007 | 0·003 | 0·704:0·296 | 0·001 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | Dihydrocholesterol | 0·013 | 0·006 | 0·699:0·301 | 0·423 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | TAG (C16 : 0, C18 : 1, C18 : 3) (additional: TAG (C16 : 0, C18 : 2, C18 : 2), TAG (C16 : 1, C18 : 1, C18 : 2)) | 0·041 | 0·018 | 0·698:0·302 | 0·300 |
| Amino acids related | Indole-3-lactic acid | 0·007 | 0·003 | 0·689:0·311 | 0·246 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | Erythro-sphingosine (d18 : 1) (additional: sphingolipids)* | 0·020 | 0·009 | 0·688:0·312 | 0·113 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | TAG (C16 : 0, C18 : 2) | 0·010 | 0·005 | 0·678:0·322 | 0·043 |
| Complex lipids, fatty acids and related | Eicosadienoic acid (C20 : 2) no. 02* | 0·010 | 0·005 | 0·672:0·328 | 0·120 |
| Vitamins, cofactors and related | α-Tocopherol* | 0·003 | 0·001 | 0·67:0·33 | 0·003 |
| Vitamins, cofactors and related | Coenzyme Q10 | 0·008 | 0·004 | 0·667:0·333 | 0·042 |
* Metabolites previously identified with high inter:intra-individual variance(,).
Fig. 2.Postprandial profiles for metabolites within clusters, identified where the correlation coefficient >0·5. ----, Average of the cluster. (a) On control diet (T1, 60 d); (b) on test diet (T5, 169 d). Note that the cluster numbers are not comparable between diets.
Fig. 3.Postprandial profiles for metabolites within ontology group, coloured by clusters identified where the correlation coefficient >0. (a) On control diet; (b) on test diet. Note that the colour codes for clusters are not comparable between diets.
Fig. 4.Metabolites consistently showing significant fold-changes >2 from fasted in postprandial state (baseline (–○–, T1, control diet), following 1 d from diet change (--□--, T2, acute) and following long-term feeding (--Δ--, T5, chronic)). (a) Metabolites achieving a 2-fold increase with increases within the first hour; (b) metabolites achieving a 2-fold increase with delayed rise (after 1 h); (c) metabolites decreasing >2-fold across the postprandial time course. Values are means, with 95 % confidence intervals represented by vertical bars.