| Literature DB >> 31019592 |
Krzysztof Brzozowski1, Jerzy Narloch1, Piotr Zięcina1, Andrzej Podgórski1, Piotr Piasecki1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To validate superior ophthalmic vein (SOV) and ophthalmic artery (OA) usefulness in immediate evaluation of new endovascular approaches to treat carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCFs).Entities:
Keywords: CCF; Onyx; coils; embolisation; interventional neuroradiology
Year: 2019 PMID: 31019592 PMCID: PMC6479058 DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2019.82807
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pol J Radiol ISSN: 1733-134X
Figure 1Note the differences in superior ophthalmic vein diameter pre- and post-treatment
Venous drainage pattern – comparison between unilateral and bilateral carotid-cavernous fistulas
| Unilateral | Bilateral | |
|---|---|---|
| Ipsilateral cavernous sinus | 7 | – |
| Bilateral cavernous sinus | 4 | 8 |
| Superior ophthalmic vein | 6 | 8 |
| Inferior ophthalmic vein | 1 | 0 |
| Straight sinus | 2 | 0 |
| Sigmoid sinus | 1 | 0 |
| Ipsilateral cortical veins | 1 | 0 |
Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients. Marked values were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Class. refers to Barrow classification category; SOV was recorded as a diameter in mm; Time, Dose, and Contrast were mean values per fistula and were recorded as min, mGy, and ml, respectively; Result refers to closure of the fistula; Material refers to either coils or Onyx-18; Exophtalmos was recorded as a distance between the interzygomatic line (a line is drawn at the anterior portions of the zygomatic arches) to the anterior surface of the globe on axial images
| Age | Sex | Class. | SOV | Bilateral | Time | Dose | Contrast | Result | Material | Trauma | Attempts | Exophtal-mos | Pseudo-aneurysm | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.72 | 0.48 | –0.06 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.01 | –0.30 | –0.71 | 0.42 | –0.57 | –0.40 | 0.06 | –0.24 | ||
| 0.72 | 0.27 | –0.07 | 0.24 | 0.14 | –0.08 | –0.12 | –0.43 | 0.100 | –0.58 | –0.03 | –0.72 | 0.09 | ||
| 0.48 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.46 | –0.24 | –0.42 | –0.63 | –0.17 | 0.49 | –0.85 | 0.07 | 0.12 | –0.67 | ||
| –0.06 | –0.07 | 0.28 | 0.25 | –0.30 | –0.33 | –0.47 | –0.06 | 0.06 | –0.26 | –0.003 | 0.13 | –0.19 | ||
| 0.03 | 0.24 | 0.46 | 0.25 | 0.09 | –0.04 | –0.15 | 0.04 | –0.07 | –0.33 | 0.41 | –0.24 | –0.04 | ||
| 0.13 | 0.14 | –0.24 | –0.30 | 0.09 | 0.93 | 0.58 | –0.08 | 0.09 | 0.25 | 0.02 | –0.36 | 0.36 | ||
| 0.01 | –0.08 | –0.42 | –0.33 | –0.04 | 0.93 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.12 | 0.47 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.39 | ||
| –0.30 | –0.12 | –0.63 | –0.47 | –0.15 | 0.58 | 0.55 | –0.05 | –0.13 | 0.88 | –0.23 | 0.06 | 0.69 | ||
| –0.71 | –0.43 | –0.17 | –0.06 | 0.04 | –0.08 | 0.00 | –0.05 | –0.13 | 0.56 | 0.49 | –0.29 | 0.24 | ||
| 0.42 | 0.10 | 0.49 | 0.06 | –0.07 | 0.09 | 0.12 | –0.13 | –0.13 | –0.22 | –0.31 | 0.44 | –0.23 | ||
| –0.57 | –0.58 | –0.85 | –0.26 | –0.33 | 0.25 | 0.47 | 0.88 | 0.56 | –0.22 | –0.03 | –0.13 | 0.74 | ||
| –0.40 | –0.03 | 0.07 | –0.003 | 0.41 | 0.02 | 0.06 | –0.23 | 0.49 | –0.31 | –0.03 | –0.61 | 0.18 | ||
| 0.06 | –0.72 | 0.12 | 0.18 | –0.24 | –0.36 | 0.08 | 0.06 | –0.29 | 0.44 | –0.13 | –0.61 | –0.33 | ||
| –0.24 | 0.09 | –0.67 | –0.19 | –0.04 | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.69 | 0.24 | –0.23 | 0.74 | 0.18 | –0.33 |
Results of the Kruskal-Wallis test – differences (p values) between types of fistulas. Significance level p < 0.05
| Age | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | D | |
| A | 0.117765 | 0.094085 | |
| B | 0.117765 | 1.000000 | |
| D | 0.094085 | 1.000000 | |
| SOV | |||
| A | B | D | |
| A | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | |
| B | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | |
| D | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | |
| Time | |||
| A | B | D | |
| A | 0.538661 | 1.000000 | |
| B | 0.538661 | 1.000000 | |
| D | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | |
| Dose | |||
| A | B | D | |
| A | 0.172353 | 0.239223 | |
| B | 0.172353 | 1.000000 | |
| D | 0.239223 | 1.000000 | |
| Contrast | |||
| A | B | D | |
| A | 0.172354 | 0.055806 | |
| B | 0.172354 | 1.000000 | |
| D | 0.055806 | 1.000000 | |
| Attempts | |||
| A | B | D | |
| A | 0.152042 | 1.000000 | |
| B | 0.152042 | 0.083094 | |
| D | 1.000000 | 0.083094 | |
| Result | |||
| A | B | D | |
| A | 0.109267 | 1.000000 | |
| B | 0.109267 | 0.052341 | |
| D | 1.000000 | 0.052341 | |
| Pseudoaneurysm | |||
| A | B | D | |
| A | 0.128697 | 0.060357 | |
| B | 0.128697 | 1.000000 | |
| D | 0.060357 | 1.000000 | |
| Trauma | |||
| A | B | D | |
| A | 0.182378 | 0.016840 | |
| B | 0.182378 | 1.000000 | |
| D | 0.016840 | 1.000000 | |
SOV – superior ophthalmic vein diameter
Figure 2Lateral projection on cerebral angiography – successful embolisation of the post-traumatic type A fistula. Note post-embolisation oedema of orbital muscles (red arrow)
Figure 3Angiography projections of consecutive stages of embolisation in an 85-year-old female with multiple skull fractures, intracerebral haemorrhage with secondary intraventricular bleeding and following. Contrast injection showed sudden recanalisation of the part of the pseudoaneurysm with active contrast extravasation from the posterior cerebral artery into ipsilateral lateral ventricle (red arrow)
Figure 4Cerebral angiography of a 24-year-old male with a history of motor vehicle head trauma. Note bilateral giant pseudoaneurysms with concomitant bilateral high-flow carotid-cavernous fistulas (type A). Pseudoaneurysms were gradually embolised with coils, resulting in resolution of fistulas and all symptoms with no peri-procedural complications or neurological deficit