| Literature DB >> 31019533 |
Carlo Cappelli1, Ilenia Pirola1, Elena Gandossi1, Fiorella Marini1, Alessandra Cristiano1, Claudio Casella2, Davide Lombardi3, Barbara Agosti1, Alberto Ferlin1, Maurizio Castellano1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Toshiba Medical System has developed a new Doppler technique [Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI)] that has improved microvascular flow imaging. SMI depicts perinodular and intranodular thyroid microvascular flow in higher detail compared to standard colour Doppler (CD) and power Doppler (PD) imaging.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31019533 PMCID: PMC6452547 DOI: 10.1155/2019/7874890
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Endocrinol ISSN: 1687-8337 Impact factor: 3.257
Figure 1Solid nodule in the left lobe: images acquired with the five modes: grayscale US (a), monochrome (b) and colour (c) SMI, CD (d), and PD (e). Monochrome and colour SMI showed microvascular flow in greater detail compared to CD or PD.
Number of blood vessels observed inside benign and malignant nodules by SMI.
| N. of vessels inside the nodule | Benign | Malignant |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 24 (21.2) | 3 (2.3) |
| 1-2 | 44 (38.6) | 20 (15.6) |
| 3-4 | 23 (20.1) | 47 (36.7) |
| >5 | 23 (20.1) | 58 (45.4) |
Demographic and ultrasound characteristics between patients of SMI score 1 and score 2 cohorts.
| SMI |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| SCORE 1 ( | SCORE 2 ( | ||
| Gender (F/M) | 68/23 | 118/27 | 0.127 |
| Age (yr) | 53.7 ± 12.1 | 54.7 ± 12.0 | 0.508 |
| Nodule size (mm) | 13.2 ± 11 | 13.3 ± 0.9 | 0.938 |
| Ultrasound feature of nodule | |||
| Hypoechogenicity (Y/N) | 68/24 | 107/43 | 0.774 |
| Microcalcification (Y/N) | 38/54 | 65/85 | 0.431 |
| Blurred margins (Y/N) | 34/58 | 45/105 | 0.164 |
| Intranodular vascularization (Y/N) | 29/63 | 108/42 | 0.001 |
Figure 2Analysis of all 242 nodules with valid cytological specimens: stratification of benign and malignant nodules in accordance to the number of vessels visualised by SMI. Score 1: maximum two blood vessels. Score 2: three or more vessels.
Demographic and ultrasound characteristics between patients with benign and malignant nodule.
| Benign nodule | Malignant nodule |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (F/M) | 99/15 | 93/35 | 0.005 |
| Age (yr) | 54.7 ± 11.4 | 54.0 ± 12.5 | 0.641 |
| Nodule size (mm) | 13.1 ± 10 | 13.2 ± 11 | 0.941 |
| Ultrasound feature of nodule | |||
| Hypoechogenicity (Y/N) | 83/31 | 92/36 | 0.873 |
| Microcalcification (Y/N) | 40/74 | 63/65 | 0.018 |
| Blurred margins (Y/N) | 37/77 | 52/76 | 0.532 |
| Intranodular vascularization (Y/N) | 48/66 | 89/39 | 0.001 |
| SMI (score 1/2) | 45/69 | 23/105 | 0.001 |
Multivariate analysis of characteristics predicting the malignancy.
| Predictors | OR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.11 (0.04-0.28) | 0.001 |
| Age | 0.99 (0.96-1.01) | 0.547 |
| Hypoechogenicity | 0.79 (0.56-1.13) | 0.208 |
| Microcalcification | 1.34 (0.69-2.60) | 0.373 |
| Blurred margins | 0.92 (0.45-1.87) | 0.547 |
| Intranodular vascularization | 1.90 (1,00-3.63) | 0.061 |
| SMI | 6.99 (3.46-12.09) | 0.001 |