| Literature DB >> 31019477 |
Lotta Winter1, Mesbah Alam2, Hans E Heissler2, Assel Saryyeva2, Denny Milakara3, Xingxing Jin4, Ivo Heitland1, Kerstin Schwabe2, Joachim K Krauss2, Kai G Kahl1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The neurobiological mechanisms underlying the clinical effects of psychotherapy are scarcely understood. In particular, the modifying effects of psychotherapy on neuronal activity are largely unknown. We here present data from an innovative experimental paradigm using the example of a patient with treatment resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (trOCD) who underwent implantation of bilateral electrodes for deep brain stimulation (DBS). The aim of the paradigm was to examine the short term effect of metacognitive therapy (MCT) on neuronal local field potentials (LFP) before and after 5 MCT sessions.Entities:
Keywords: BNST/IC; deep brain stimulation; local field potential; metacognitive therapy; treatment resistance
Year: 2019 PMID: 31019477 PMCID: PMC6458268 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00660
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Study protocol.
| Day | Procedure | Time |
|---|---|---|
| One week before | Pre-assesment (Y-Bocs, HamD, BDI, OCD-S), | T0 |
| Day 1 | Surgery: implantation of electrodes | |
| Day 2 | One day break | |
| Day 3 | Neurophysiological recordings | Pre-therapy |
| Day 4 | MCT 3 | |
| Day 5 | one day break (to practice ATT) | |
| Day 6 | MCT 5 | |
| Day 7 | Surgery: implantation of IPG |
FIGURE 1Illustration shows the LFPs were recorded as bipolar configuration from DBS electrodes from contacts 0 and 1 before and after MCT for a total of 300 s (100 s epoch was preferentially used to fulfill the stationarity criteria) (A). Parallel EEG was recorded as unipolar configuration according to 10/20 system from cortical surface electrodes F3 and F4 (frontal cortical/motor planning area). F3 and F4 electrodes were linked together with left and right mastoid (M1 + M2) as reference (B).
Course of selected items of the Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Scale (OCD-S) ratings: T0 represents the baseline intensity of OCD symptoms before the first MCT session.
| Item | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How distressing and disabling have your obsessional thoughts/ urges been? | 7 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| How often have you done the following in order to cope with your obsessions? | ||||
| - Repeatedly checked | 7 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
| - Acted cautiously | 8 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| - Asked for reassurance | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| - Repeated my actions | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| How often have you avoided the following? | ||||
| - Social situations | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| - Uncertainty | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| How much do you believe each of the listed beliefs? | ||||
| - Obsessional thoughts could change me as a person. | 100 | 80 | 60 | 40 |
| - If I think something is contaminated it probably is contaminated | 100 | 60 | 0 | 0 |
| - I cannot have peace of mind unless I perform my rituals. | 40 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
| - My anxiety will persist if I don’t perform my rituals. | 80 | 70 | 40 | 20 |
| - Obsessional thoughts increase the chance of negative events in the future. | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| - Neutralizing my thoughts keeps others/ me safe. | 70 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
FIGURE 2Relative power of LFPs in the BNST from DBS electrodes: The bar plots represent the mean ± SEM percentage of relative power of theta (4–8 Hz) band (A), alpha (8–12 Hz) band (B), beta (12–30 Hz) band (C) and gamma (30–100 Hz) band (D) oscillatory activity of LFPs recorded in the BNST of left and right electrodes with bipolar reference from contacts 0 vs. 1. Statistical significant differences were determined by paired sample t-test and is shown by asterisks (∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01).
FIGURE 3Coherence of frontal cortical EEG and BNST-LFPs of DBS electrodes: The bar plots show the mean ± SEM ratio-transformed coherence of the theta (A), alpha (B), beta (C), and gamma (D) frequency band coherence between BNST-LFPs (left and right electrodes, bipolar reference from contacts 0 vs. 1) and the frontal cortical area (EEG left and right frontal cortex). Statistical significance was determined using paired sample t-test and is shown by asterisk (∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01).