| Literature DB >> 31019337 |
Beatriz Birelli1, Mauricio Oliveira2, Allan de Oliveira Santos1,3, Willians Manso4, Andreia Vicente3, Elba Etchebehere1,3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) on muscles, using 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT.Entities:
Keywords: Athletes; Electrical stimulation; Muscle, skeletal/blood supply.; Technetium Tc 99m sestamibi; Tomography, X-ray computed/methods; Tomography, emission-computed, single-photon/methods
Year: 2019 PMID: 31019337 PMCID: PMC6472863 DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2018.0006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiol Bras ISSN: 0100-3984
Figure 1Three-phase EMS protocol.
Figure 2Images acquired before and after EMS (A and B, respectively). Note the increased perfusion in the rectus femoris and vastus medialis muscle groups after EMS. For quantification, a VOI, based on anatomical findings, was drawn around the rectus femoris muscle of the right thigh (thick arrow), and the same VOI was automatically copied for the same area after stimulation (thin arrow). A comparable VOI was subsequently drawn around the vastus medialis muscle (VOI not shown).
Demographic characteristics of the 20 participants submitted to EMS and radiotracer uptake in both muscle groups during 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/ CT muscle perfusion scintigraphy, before and after EMS.
| Vastus medialis muscle group | Rectus femoris muscle group | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-EMS | Post-EMS | Pre-EMS | Post-EMS | |||||||||||||
| Athlete number | Age (years) | Right | Left | Right/left ratio | Right | Left | Right/left ratio | Right | Left | Right/left ratio | Right | Left | Right/left ratio | |||
| 1 | 28 | 27 | 26 | 1.0 | 118 | 67 | 1.8 | 16 | 18 | 0.9 | 82 | 48 | 1.7 | |||
| 2 | 32 | 21 | 23 | 0.9 | 67 | 38 | 1.8 | 17 | 17 | 1.0 | 44 | 27 | 1.6 | |||
| 3 | 25 | 22 | 17 | 1.3 | 154 | 57 | 2.7 | 16 | 12 | 1.3 | 91 | 42 | 2.2 | |||
| 4 | 20 | 13 | 14 | 0.9 | 134 | 46 | 2.9 | 12 | 11 | 1.1 | 101 | 35 | 2.9 | |||
| 5 | 29 | 22 | 19 | 1.2 | 140 | 51 | 2.8 | 17 | 13 | 1.3 | 93 | 22 | 4.2 | |||
| 6 | 26 | 19 | 20 | 0.9 | 114 | 48 | 2.4 | 18 | 17 | 1.1 | 78 | 30 | 2.6 | |||
| 7 | 30 | 21 | 19 | 1.1 | 140 | 69 | 2.0 | 16 | 12 | 1.3 | 92 | 39 | 2.4 | |||
| 8 | 36 | 41 | 32 | 1.3 | 116 | 74 | 1.6 | 32 | 28 | 1.1 | 98 | 58 | 1.7 | |||
| 9 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 1.1 | 130 | 66 | 2.0 | 12 | 12 | 1.0 | 114 | 47 | 2.4 | |||
| 10 | 26 | 12 | 16 | 0.8 | 122 | 36 | 3.4 | 16 | 12 | 1.3 | 62 | 25 | 2.5 | |||
| 11 | 23 | 15 | 17 | 0.9 | 78 | 59 | 1.3 | 11 | 11 | 1.0 | 69 | 33 | 2.1 | |||
| 12 | 19 | 11 | 10 | 1.1 | 86 | 45 | 1.9 | 7 | 7 | 1.0 | 86 | 33 | 2.6 | |||
| 13 | 19 | 13 | 17 | 0.8 | 140 | 38 | 3.7 | 10 | 8 | 1.3 | 72 | 23 | 3.1 | |||
| 14 | 19 | 17 | 21 | 0.8 | 91 | 83 | 1.1 | 10 | 12 | 0.8 | 72 | 37 | 2.0 | |||
| 15 | 28 | 12 | 15 | 0.8 | 83 | 33 | 2.5 | 8 | 8 | 1.0 | 37 | 24 | 1.5 | |||
| 16 | 25 | 21 | 22 | 1.0 | 82 | 48 | 1.7 | 15 | 18 | 0.8 | 77 | 35 | 2.2 | |||
| 17 | 28 | 14 | 15 | 0.9 | 92 | 25 | 3.7 | 12 | 12 | 1.0 | 90 | 17 | 5.3 | |||
| 18 | 21 | 29 | 27 | 1.1 | 72 | 42 | 1.7 | 21 | 17 | 1.2 | 69 | 38 | 1.8 | |||
| 19 | 25 | 46 | 36 | 1.3 | 117 | 49 | 2.4 | 24 | 24 | 1.0 | 90 | 37 | 2.4 | |||
| 20 | 23 | 22 | 13 | 1.7 | 100 | 45 | 2.2 | 12 | 12 | 1.0 | 71 | 37 | 1.9 | |||
| Mean | 25.1 | 20.9 | 19.9 | 1.04 | 108.8 | 50.9 | 2.27 | 15.1 | 14.1 | 1.08 | 79.4 | 34.3 | 2.46 | |||
| SD | 4.7 | 9.2 | 6.4 | 0.23 | 26.2 | 14.9 | 0.7 | 5.8 | 5.2 | 0.16 | 18.5 | 9.9 | 0.91 | |||
Figure 3Radiotracer uptake values (means and ratios) for both muscle groups in the participants evaluated.
Pre-EMSratio and post-EMSratio values obtained for both of the muscle groups evaluated.
| Muscle group | Ratios | Mean | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-EMSratio | 1.04 | 0.95-1.13 | |
| Vastus medialis | Post-EMSratio | 2.27 | 1.90-2.65 |
| Post-EMSratio / Pre-EMSratio | 1.23 | 0.86-1.61 | |
| Pre-EMSratio | 1.08 | 0.99-1.17 | |
| Rectus femoris | Post-EMSratio | 2.46 | 2.08-2.83 |
| Post-EMSratio / Pre-EMSratio | 1.38 | 0.96-1.79 |