Literature DB >> 31019250

Various surfaces challenge gait characteristics of ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury.

Donlaya Promkeaw1,2, Preeda Arrayawichanon2,3, Thiwabhorn Thaweewannakij1,2, Lugkana Mato1,2, Pipatana Amatachaya2,4, Sugalya Amatachaya5,6.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of various surfaces on the gait characteristics of ambulatory participants with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) as compared to data from able-bodied participants.
SETTING: A tertiary rehabilitation center and communities.
METHODS: Seventy participants (35 ambulatory individuals with incomplete SCI and 35 able-bodied individuals with gender- and age-matched) were assessed for their spatiotemporal gait variables while walking over a 10-m walkway of different surfaces (including hard, artificial grass, soft, and pebble surfaces) at a self-selected and fastest speed. The findings were analyzed using the method of manual digitization. The data among the surfaces were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test, with a level of statistical significance at P < 0.05.
RESULTS: Participants with incomplete SCI could safely walk over every surface without any adverse events. Their average stride length, cadence, and walking speed, but not percent step length symmetry, were significantly decreased while walking on the artificial grass, soft, and particularly pebble surfaces as compared to those found on a hard surface. These changes were found particularly in those with SCI, resulting in a walking speed decreased from 0.11 to 0.35 m/s, whereas the reduction of walking speed of able-bodied participants ranged from 0.04 to 0.20 m/s.
CONCLUSIONS: The spatiotemporal characteristics of ambulatory participants with SCI were dramatically affected by the surfaces as compared to the data found in able-bodied participants. The findings have potential clinical implications for the incorporation of various surfaces to promote the functional outcomes and safety for ambulatory individuals with SCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31019250     DOI: 10.1038/s41393-019-0282-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  25 in total

1.  Level walking and ambulatory capacity in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury: relationship with muscle strength.

Authors:  C M Kim; J J Eng; M W Whittaker
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011).

Authors:  Steven C Kirshblum; Stephen P Burns; Fin Biering-Sorensen; William Donovan; Daniel E Graves; Amitabh Jha; Mark Johansen; Linda Jones; Andrei Krassioukov; M J Mulcahey; Mary Schmidt-Read; William Waring
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  The effect of textured surfaces on postural stability and lower limb muscle activity.

Authors:  Anna Lucy Hatton; John Dixon; Denis Martin; Keith Rome
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 2.368

4.  Do ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury walk symmetrically?

Authors:  M Kumprou; P Amatachaya; T Sooknuan; T Thaweewannakij; L Mato; S Amatachaya
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Is walking symmetry important for ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury?

Authors:  Makamas Kumprou; Pipatana Amatachaya; Thanat Sooknuan; Thiwabhorn Thaweewannakij; Sugalya Amatachaya
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.033

6.  Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants.

Authors:  R W Bohannon
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 10.668

Review 7.  Locomotor training after human spinal cord injury: a series of case studies.

Authors:  A L Behrman; S J Harkema
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2000-07

8.  Kinematic strategies for walking across a destabilizing rock surface.

Authors:  Deanna H Gates; Jason M Wilken; Shawn J Scott; Emily H Sinitski; Jonathan B Dingwell
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  The energy cost of walking or running on sand.

Authors:  P Zamparo; R Perini; C Orizio; M Sacher; G Ferretti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

10.  Mechanics and energetics of human locomotion on sand.

Authors:  T M Lejeune; P A Willems; N C Heglund
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of testing procedures on gait speed measurement: A systematic review.

Authors:  Anna K Stuck; Madeleine Bachmann; Pia Füllemann; Karen R Josephson; Andreas E Stuck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Effect of Walking Adaptability on an Uneven Surface by a Stepping Pattern on Walking Activity After Stroke.

Authors:  Yusuke Sekiguchi; Keita Honda; Shin-Ichi Izumi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.169

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.