Literature DB >> 31018981

Molecular Bacterial Load Assay Concurs with Culture on NaOH-Induced Loss of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Viability.

Bariki Mtafya1,2, Wilber Sabiiti2, Issa Sabi1, Joseph John1, Emanuel Sichone1, Nyanda E Ntinginya1, Stephen H Gillespie3.   

Abstract

Effective methods to detect viable Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the main causative agent of tuberculosis (TB), are urgently needed. To date, cultivation of M. tuberculosis is the gold standard, which depends on initial sample processing with N-acetyl-l-cysteine-sodium hydroxide (NALC-NaOH), chemicals that compromise M. tuberculosis viability and, consequently, the performance of downstream tests. We applied culture and the novel molecular bacterial load assay (MBLA) to measure the loss of M. tuberculosis viability following NALC-NaOH treatment of M. tuberculosis H37Rv pure culture and clinical sputum samples from pulmonary TB patients. Compared to the bacterial loads of untreated controls, NALC-NaOH treatment of M. tuberculosis reduced the MBLA-detectable bacillary load (estimated number of CFU [eCFU] per milliliter) by 0.66 ± 0.21 log10 at 23°C (P = 0.018) and 0.72 ± 0.08 log10 at 30°C (P = 0.013). Likewise, NALC-NaOH treatment reduced the viable count on solid culture by 0.84 ± 0.02 log10 CFU/ml at 23°C (P < 0.001) and 0.85 ± 0.01 log10 CFU/ml at 30°C (P < 0.001), respectively. The reduction in the viable count was reflected by a corresponding increase in the time to positivity of the mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) liquid culture: 1.2 days at 23°C (P < 0.001) and 1.1 days at 30°C (P < 0.001). This NaOH-induced M. tuberculosis viability loss was replicated in clinical sputum samples, with the bacterial load dropping by 0.65 ± 0.17 log10 from 5.36 ± 0.24 log10 eCFU/ml to 4.71 ± 0.16 log10 eCFU/ml for untreated and treated sputa, respectively. Applying the model of Bowness et al. (R. Bowness, M. J. Boeree, R. Aarnoutse, R. Dawson, et al., J Antimicrob Chemother 70:448-455, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dku415) revealed that the treated MGIT time to culture positivity of 142 ± 7.02 h was equivalent to 4.86 ± 0.28 log10 CFU, consistent with the MBLA-measured bacterial load. Our study confirms the contribution of NALC-NaOH treatment to the loss of viable bacterial counts. Tests that obviate the need for decontamination may offer an alternative option for the accurate detection of viable M. tuberculosis and treatment response monitoring.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mycobacterium tuberculosiszzm321990; NALC-NaOH; culture; decontamination; molecular bacterial load assay; sputum

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31018981      PMCID: PMC6595441          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01992-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  30 in total

1.  Identification of viable and non-viable Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mouse organs by directed RT-PCR for antigen 85B mRNA.

Authors:  S R Pai; J K Actor; E Sepulveda; R L Hunter; C Jagannath
Journal:  Microb Pathog       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood.

Authors:  A A Miles; S S Misra; J O Irwin
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1938-11

3.  Comparative evaluation of BACTEC MGIT 960 with BACTEC 9000 MB and LJ for isolation of mycobacteria in The Gambia.

Authors:  Jacob Otu; Martin Antonio; Yin Bun Cheung; Simon Donkor; Bouke C De Jong; Tumani Corrah; Richard A Adegbola
Journal:  J Infect Dev Ctries       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 0.968

4.  Monitoring treatment of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis: can PCR be applied?

Authors:  V O Thomsen; A Kok-Jensen; M Buser; S Philippi-Schulz; H J Burkardt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Sputum monitoring during tuberculosis treatment for predicting outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David J Horne; Sarah E Royce; Lisa Gooze; Masahiro Narita; Philip C Hopewell; Payam Nahid; Karen R Steingart
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 25.071

6.  Monitoring therapeutic efficacy by real-time detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis mRNA in sputum.

Authors:  Nino Mdivani; Haijing Li; Maka Akhalaia; Medea Gegia; Leila Goginashvili; Douglas S Kernodle; George Khechinashvili; Yi-Wei Tang
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Resuscitation-promoting factors reveal an occult population of tubercle Bacilli in Sputum.

Authors:  Galina V Mukamolova; Obolbek Turapov; Joanne Malkin; Gerrit Woltmann; Michael R Barer
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Time to detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in BACTEC systems as a viable alternative to colony counting.

Authors:  C Pheiffer; N M Carroll; N Beyers; P Donald; K Duncan; P Uys; P van Helden
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Comparison of two concentrations of NALC-NaOH for decontamination of sputum for mycobacterial culture.

Authors:  R L Peres; E L Maciel; C G Morais; F C K Ribeiro; S A Vinhas; C Pinheiro; R Dietze; J L Johnson; K Eisenach; M Palaci
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Comparison of four culture systems for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the Zambian National Reference Laboratory.

Authors:  M Muyoyeta; J A Schaap; P De Haas; W Mwanza; M W Muvwimi; P Godfrey-Faussett; H Ayles
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Tuberculosis Treatment Monitoring and Outcome Measures: New Interest and New Strategies.

Authors:  Jan Heyckendorf; Sophia B Georghiou; Nicole Frahm; Norbert Heinrich; Irina Kontsevaya; Maja Reimann; David Holtzman; Marjorie Imperial; Daniela M Cirillo; Stephen H Gillespie; Morten Ruhwald
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 50.129

2.  Evaluation and comparison of antibiotic susceptibility profiles of Streptomyces spp. from clinical specimens revealed common and region-dependent resistance patterns.

Authors:  Lucie Kotrbová; Ana Catalina Lara; Erika Corretto; Josef Scharfen; Vít Ulmann; Kateřina Petříčková; Alica Chroňáková
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Evaluation of the molecular bacterial load assay for detecting viable Mycobacterium tuberculosis in cerebrospinal fluid before and during tuberculous meningitis treatment.

Authors:  Hoang Thanh Hai; Wilber Sabiiti; Do Dang Anh Thu; Nguyen Hoan Phu; Stephen H Gillespie; Guy E Thwaites; Nguyen Thuy Thuong Thuong
Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.131

4.  Comparison of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis molecular bacterial load assay, microscopy and GeneXpert versus liquid culture for viable bacterial load quantification before and after starting pulmonary tuberculosis treatment.

Authors:  Hoang T Hai; Dao N Vinh; Do D A Thu; Nguyen T Hanh; Nguyen H Phu; Vijay Srinivasan; Guy E Thwaites; Nguyen T T Thuong
Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 3.131

5.  A novel, rapid (within hours) culture-free diagnostic method for detecting live Mycobacterium tuberculosis with high sensitivity.

Authors:  Wen-Hung Wang; Rikiya Takeuchi; Shu-Huei Jain; Yong-Huang Jiang; Sonoko Watanuki; Yoshiharu Ohtaki; Kazunari Nakaishi; Satoshi Watabe; Po-Liang Lu; Etsuro Ito
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 8.143

6.  Mycobactericidal Effects of Different Regimens Measured by Molecular Bacterial Load Assay among People Treated for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Tanzania.

Authors:  Peter M Mbelele; Emmanuel A Mpolya; Elingarami Sauli; Bariki Mtafya; Nyanda E Ntinginya; Kennedy K Addo; Katharina Kreppel; Sayoki Mfinanga; Patrick P J Phillips; Stephen H Gillespie; Scott K Heysell; Wilber Sabiiti; Stellah G Mpagama
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  High Mycobacterium tuberculosis Bacillary Loads Detected by Tuberculosis Molecular Bacterial Load Assay in Patient Stool: a Potential Alternative for Nonsputum Diagnosis and Treatment Response Monitoring of Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Emmanuel Musisi; Abdul Sessolo; Sylvia Kaswabuli; Josephine Zawedde; Patrick Byanyima; Shariifah Kasinga; Ingvar Sanyu; Esther Uwimaana; Stanley Walimbwa; Joseph Olore; Willy Ssengooba; Christine Sekaggya; Moses L Joloba; William Worodria; Laurence Huang; Stephen H Gillespie; Derek J Sloan; Wilber Sabiiti
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-01-12

8.  Improved detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and M. bovis in African wildlife samples using cationic peptide decontamination and mycobacterial culture supplementation.

Authors:  Wynand J Goosen; Léanie Kleynhans; Tanya J Kerr; Paul D van Helden; Peter Buss; Robin M Warren; Michele A Miller
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2021-09-11       Impact factor: 1.279

Review 9.  Molecular bacterial load assay versus culture for monitoring treatment response in adults with tuberculosis.

Authors:  Bibie Said; Loveness Charlie; Emnet Getachew; Catherine Lydiah Wanjiru; Mekdelawit Abebe; Tsegahun Manyazewal
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2021-07-17

10.  Re-decontamination of liquid mycobacterial cultures: Additional Mycobacterium tuberculosis yield in the era of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra in Cape Town, South Africa.

Authors:  Dawood da Costa; Pieter Nel
Journal:  Afr J Lab Med       Date:  2021-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.