BACKGROUND: Asymmetrical stepping patterns are chronic gait impairment for individuals with non-traumatic lower limb amputation. Persistent gait asymmetries contribute to poor gait efficiency, decreased physical function, and development of secondary orthopedic conditions. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the feasibility and preliminary responsiveness of a treadmill-based, error-augmentation gait training protocol to improve gait symmetry in patients with non-traumatic transtibial amputation. STUDY DESIGN: Single group, pre- and post-test. METHODS: The error-augmentation gait training protocol involved walking on a split-belt treadmill with asymmetrical belt speeds for five 3-min sets. Spatiotemporal gait characteristics during overground walking at self-selected and fast walking speeds were assessed prior to, immediately after, and 20 min following the error-augmentation gait training protocol. Outcomes included practicality, implementation feasibility, safety, participant acceptability, and change in gait asymmetry. RESULTS: All four participants completed the error-augmentation gait training protocol as prescribed, without adverse events, and found the intervention to be acceptable. Step length and stance time asymmetry during overground walking changed immediately following the error-augmentation gait training protocol with inconsistent changes retained after a 20 min washout period. CONCLUSIONS: A single session of error-augmentation gait training is a feasible and safe intervention to modify gait asymmetry in patients with non-traumatic transtibial amputation. Additional study with larger sample sizes and repeated error-augmentation gait training dosing are warranted. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Gait training using error-augmentation on a split-belt treadmill may modify step length and stance time asymmetry for patients with non-traumatic transtibial amputation, but additional research is needed regarding short- and long-term efficacy. Additional training sessions may be needed to sustain initial changes achieved from a single session.
BACKGROUND: Asymmetrical stepping patterns are chronic gait impairment for individuals with non-traumatic lower limb amputation. Persistent gait asymmetries contribute to poor gait efficiency, decreased physical function, and development of secondary orthopedic conditions. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the feasibility and preliminary responsiveness of a treadmill-based, error-augmentation gait training protocol to improve gait symmetry in patients with non-traumatic transtibial amputation. STUDY DESIGN: Single group, pre- and post-test. METHODS: The error-augmentation gait training protocol involved walking on a split-belt treadmill with asymmetrical belt speeds for five 3-min sets. Spatiotemporal gait characteristics during overground walking at self-selected and fast walking speeds were assessed prior to, immediately after, and 20 min following the error-augmentation gait training protocol. Outcomes included practicality, implementation feasibility, safety, participant acceptability, and change in gait asymmetry. RESULTS: All four participants completed the error-augmentation gait training protocol as prescribed, without adverse events, and found the intervention to be acceptable. Step length and stance time asymmetry during overground walking changed immediately following the error-augmentation gait training protocol with inconsistent changes retained after a 20 min washout period. CONCLUSIONS: A single session of error-augmentation gait training is a feasible and safe intervention to modify gait asymmetry in patients with non-traumatic transtibial amputation. Additional study with larger sample sizes and repeated error-augmentation gait training dosing are warranted. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Gait training using error-augmentation on a split-belt treadmill may modify step length and stance time asymmetry for patients with non-traumatic transtibial amputation, but additional research is needed regarding short- and long-term efficacy. Additional training sessions may be needed to sustain initial changes achieved from a single session.
Authors: Hemakumar Devan; Paul Hendrick; Leigh Hale; Allan Carman; Michael P Dillon; Daniel Cury Ribeiro Journal: PM R Date: 2017-03-02 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Ravishankar Hasanadka; Robert B McLafferty; Colleen J Moore; Douglas B Hood; Don E Ramsey; Kim J Hodgson Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2011-08-15 Impact factor: 4.268