Purpose: To determine the repeatability and reproducibility of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and Scheimpflug photography for several measurements of corneal scars, including scar size, scar depth, and corneal thickness. Methods: A series of patients treated for fungal keratitis at a tertiary eye care center in South India were recalled two years after successful treatment. Eyes with corneal scars had a slit lamp examination performed by two ophthalmologists masked to the other's examination. For AS-OCT and Scheimpflug photography, each eye had two scans taken by one technician and a third scan taken by a separate technician. Scar measurements were subsequently assessed from AS-OCT images by three graders masked to each other's results. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed by calculating the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) from mixed effects linear regression models. Results: Fifty eyes had all measurements taken. The corneal scar size, measured as the geometric mean of the two longest perpendicular meridians, ranged from 0.8 to 5.4 (mean 2.8 mm, 95%CI 2.6 to 3.1). Scar size measurements taken by two separate individuals were most reproducible when the border of the scar was traced from the OCT (ICC 0.90, 95%CI 0.86 to 0.94), and least repeatable when assessed from slit lamp examination (ICC 0.80, 95%CI 0.70 to 0.90). Conclusions: AS-OCT and Scheimpflug imaging of corneal scars produced measurements with acceptable reproducibility that could be useful as cornea-specific outcomes for clinical trials.
Purpose: To determine the repeatability and reproducibility of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and Scheimpflug photography for several measurements of corneal scars, including scar size, scar depth, and corneal thickness. Methods: A series of patients treated for fungal keratitis at a tertiary eye care center in South India were recalled two years after successful treatment. Eyes with corneal scars had a slit lamp examination performed by two ophthalmologists masked to the other's examination. For AS-OCT and Scheimpflug photography, each eye had two scans taken by one technician and a third scan taken by a separate technician. Scar measurements were subsequently assessed from AS-OCT images by three graders masked to each other's results. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed by calculating the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) from mixed effects linear regression models. Results: Fifty eyes had all measurements taken. The corneal scar size, measured as the geometric mean of the two longest perpendicular meridians, ranged from 0.8 to 5.4 (mean 2.8 mm, 95%CI 2.6 to 3.1). Scar size measurements taken by two separate individuals were most reproducible when the border of the scar was traced from the OCT (ICC 0.90, 95%CI 0.86 to 0.94), and least repeatable when assessed from slit lamp examination (ICC 0.80, 95%CI 0.70 to 0.90). Conclusions: AS-OCT and Scheimpflug imaging of corneal scars produced measurements with acceptable reproducibility that could be useful as cornea-specific outcomes for clinical trials.
Authors: Shivali A Menda; Manoranjan Das; Arun Panigrahi; N Venkatesh Prajna; Nisha R Acharya; Thomas M Lietman; Stephen D McLeod; Jeremy D Keenan Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 7.389