Literature DB >> 31018666

Routine Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Rutger J van Bommel1, Kaneshka Masdjedi1, Roberto Diletti1, Miguel E Lemmert1, Laurens van Zandvoort1, Jeroen Wilschut1, Felix Zijlstra1, Peter de Jaegere1, Joost Daemen1, Nicolas M van Mieghem1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the current gold standard to determine hemodynamic severity of angiographically intermediate coronary lesions. Much less is known about the prognostic effects of FFR measured directly after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aims of this study were to evaluate post-PCI FFR values, identify predictors for a low post-PCI FFR, and to investigate whether a relationship between postprocedural FFR and outcome during 30-day follow-up exists. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The FFR-SEARCH (Fractional Flow Reserve-Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) is a prospective registry in which FFR measurements were performed after PCI in 1000 consecutive patients. All FFR measurements were performed under maximum hyperemia with intravenous adenosine with the Navvus RXi system (ACIST Medical Systems, Eden Prairie, MN). The clinical end point was defined as a composite of death, target vessel revascularization, or nonfatal myocardial infarction at 30-day follow-up. Measurement of post-PCI FFR was successful in 959 patients (96%), and a total of 1165 lesions were assessed. There were no complications related to the microcatheter. A total of 322 ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients with 371 measured lesions were excluded leaving 637 patients with 794 measured lesions for the final analysis. Overall post-PCI FFR was 0.90±0.07. In 396 lesions (50%), post-PCI FFR was >0.90. A total of 357 patients (56%) had ≥1 lesion(s) with a post-PCI FFR ≤0.90, and 73 patients (11%) had ≥1 lesion(s) with a post-PCI FFR ≤0.80 with post-PCI FFR ≤0.80 in 78 lesions (9.8%). Complex lesion characteristics, use of multiple stents and smaller reference vessel diameter was associated with post-PCI FFR ≤0.90. During follow-up, 11 patients (1.8%) reached the clinical end point. There was no significant relationship between post-PCI FFR and the clinical end point at 30-day follow-up ( P=0.636).
CONCLUSIONS: Routine measurement of post-PCI FFR using a monorail microcatheter is safe and feasible. Several lesion and patient characteristics were associated with a low post-PCI FFR. Post-PCI FFR did not correlate with clinical events at 30 days.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adenosine; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention; prognosis; stents

Year:  2019        PMID: 31018666     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  9 in total

Review 1.  Management of Angina Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Jose B Cruz Rodriguez; Subrata Kar
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Agreement of Angiography-Derived and Wire-Based Fractional Flow Reserves in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Hu Ai; Naixin Zheng; Le Li; Guojian Yang; Hui Li; Guodong Tang; Qi Zhou; Huiping Zhang; Xue Yu; Feng Xu; Ying Zhao; Fucheng Sun
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-04-23

3.  A randomized controlled trial of a physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention optimization strategy: Rationale and design of the TARGET FFR study.

Authors:  Damien Collison; John D McClure; Colin Berry; Keith G Oldroyd
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.882

4.  Impact of Poststenting Fractional Flow Reserve on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes: The FFR-SEARCH Study.

Authors:  Roberto Diletti; Kaneshka Masdjedi; Joost Daemen; Laurens J C van Zandvoort; Tara Neleman; Jeroen Wilschut; Wijnand K Den Dekker; Rutger J van Bommel; Miguel Lemmert; Isabella Kardys; Paul Cummins; Peter de Jaegere; Felix Zijlstra; Nicolas M Van Mieghem
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 6.546

Review 5.  Physiologic Assessment after Coronary Stent Implantation.

Authors:  Doyeon Hwang; Seokhun Yang; Jinlong Zhang; Bon Kwon Koo
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.243

6.  Residual Quantitative Flow Ratio to Estimate Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve.

Authors:  Pepijn A van Diemen; Ruben W de Winter; Stefan P Schumacher; Michiel J Bom; Roel S Driessen; Henk Everaars; Ruurt A Jukema; Yvemarie B Somsen; Lenka Popelkova; Peter M van de Ven; Albert C van Rossum; Tim P van de Hoef; Stefan de Haan; Koen M Marques; Jorrit S Lemkes; Yolande Appelman; Alexander Nap; Niels J Verouden; Maksymilian P Opolski; Ibrahim Danad; Paul Knaapen
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting.

Authors:  Mariusz Tomaniak; Tara Neleman; Anniek Ziedses des Plantes; Kaneshka Masdjedi; Laurens J C van Zandvoort; Janusz Kochman; Wijnand K den Dekker; Jeroen M Wilschut; Roberto Diletti; Isabella Kardys; Felix Zijlstra; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Joost Daemen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Prognostic Implications of Fractional Flow Reserve After Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Doyeon Hwang; Bon-Kwon Koo; Jinlong Zhang; Jiesuck Park; Seokhun Yang; Minsang Kim; Jun Pil Yun; Joo Myung Lee; Chang-Wook Nam; Eun-Seok Shin; Joon-Hyung Doh; Shao-Liang Chen; Tsunekazu Kakuta; Gabor G Toth; Zsolt Piroth; Nils P Johnson; Nico H J Pijls; Abdul Hakeem; Barry F Uretsky; Yohei Hokama; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Hong-Seok Lim; Tsuyoshi Ito; Akiko Matsuo; Lorenzo Azzalini; Massoud A Leesar; Tara Neleman; Nicolas M van Mieghem; Roberto Diletti; Joost Daemen; Damien Collison; Carlos Collet; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-09-01

9.  Post-stenting fractional flow reserve vs coronary angiography for optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (TARGET-FFR).

Authors:  Damien Collison; Matthaios Didagelos; Muhammad Aetesam-Ur-Rahman; Samuel Copt; Robert McDade; Peter McCartney; Thomas J Ford; John McClure; Mitchell Lindsay; Aadil Shaukat; Paul Rocchiccioli; Richard Brogan; Stuart Watkins; Margaret McEntegart; Richard Good; Keith Robertson; Patrick O'Boyle; Andrew Davie; Adnan Khan; Stuart Hood; Hany Eteiba; Colin Berry; Keith G Oldroyd
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 29.983

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.