Literature DB >> 31017844

Visual perception of joint stiffness from multijoint motion.

Meghan E Huber1, Charlotte Folinus1, Neville Hogan1,2.   

Abstract

Humans have an astonishing ability to extract hidden information from the movements of others. For example, even with limited kinematic information, humans can distinguish between biological and nonbiological motion, identify the age and gender of a human demonstrator, and recognize what action a human demonstrator is performing. It is unknown, however, whether they can also estimate hidden mechanical properties of another's limbs simply by observing their motions. Strictly speaking, identifying an object's mechanical properties, such as stiffness, requires contact. With only motion information, unambiguous measurements of stiffness are fundamentally impossible, since the same limb motion can be generated with an infinite number of stiffness values. However, we show that humans can readily estimate the stiffness of a simulated limb from its motion. In three experiments, we found that participants linearly increased their rating of arm stiffness as joint stiffness parameters in the arm controller increased. This was remarkable since there was no physical contact with the simulated limb. Moreover, participants had no explicit knowledge of how the simulated arm was controlled. To successfully map nontrivial changes in multijoint motion to changes in arm stiffness, participants likely drew on prior knowledge of human neuromotor control. Having an internal representation consistent with the behavior of the controller used to drive the simulated arm implies that this control policy competently captures key features of veridical biological control. Finding that humans can extract latent features of neuromotor control from kinematics also provides new insight into how humans interpret the motor actions of others. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Humans can visually perceive another's overt motion, but it is unknown whether they can also perceive the hidden dynamic properties of another's limbs from their motions. Here, we show that humans can correctly infer changes in limb stiffness from nontrivial changes in multijoint limb motion without force information or explicit knowledge of the underlying limb controller. Our findings suggest that humans presume others control motor behavior in such a way that limb stiffness influences motion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  action understanding; dynamic primitives; joint stiffness; motor control; motor perception

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31017844      PMCID: PMC6689771          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00514.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  37 in total

1.  Time-varying stiffness of human elbow joint during cyclic voluntary movement.

Authors:  D J Bennett; J M Hollerbach; Y Xu; I W Hunter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Endpoint stiffness of the arm is directionally tuned to instability in the environment.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Gary Liaw; Theodore E Milner; Rieko Osu; Etienne Burdet; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Independent coactivation of shoulder and elbow muscles.

Authors:  P L Gribble; D J Ostry
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Physiological mechanisms for stabilizing the limb when acting against physical constraints.

Authors:  P Senot; L Damm; M Tagliabue; J McIntyre
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

5.  Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  L Fadiga; L Fogassi; G Pavesi; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory.

Authors:  J R Lackner; P Dizio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Motor learning by observing.

Authors:  Andrew A G Mattar; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Stability properties of human reaching movements.

Authors:  J Won; N Hogan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Neural representations of kinematic laws of motion: evidence for action-perception coupling.

Authors:  Eran Dayan; Antonino Casile; Nava Levit-Binnun; Martin A Giese; Talma Hendler; Tamar Flash
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Putting actions in context: visual action adaptation aftereffects are modulated by social contexts.

Authors:  Stephan de la Rosa; Stephan Streuber; Martin Giese; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Cristóbal Curio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.