| Literature DB >> 31017227 |
Jocieli Malacarne1, Alexsandro Santos Heirich2, Eunice Atsuko Totumi Cunha3, Ida Viktoria Kolte4, Reinaldo Souza-Santos4, Paulo Cesar Basta4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of rapid molecular testing as a diagnostic tool and estimate the incidence of smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis among the indigenous population.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31017227 PMCID: PMC6733740 DOI: 10.1590/1806-3713/e20180185
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Bras Pneumol ISSN: 1806-3713 Impact factor: 2.624
Proportion of respiratory symptomatic patients (RSPs), incidence of smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis in the villages, and diagnostic tests (bacilloscopy, rapid molecular testing, and sputum culture) performed in RSPs.
| 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Total | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSPs in the villages | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % |
| Amambai | 204 | 2.7 | 271 | 3.5 | 321 | 4.1 | 443 | 5.5 | 370 | 4.4 | 258 | 1.7 | 1,867 | 3.9 |
| Taquaperi | 236 | 7.9 | 212 | 6.9 | 173 | 5.5 | 123 | 3.8 | 143 | 4.2 | 139 | 3.1 | 1,026 | 5.3 |
| Limão Verde | 130 | 8.3 | 117 | 7.3 | 94 | 5.7 | 91 | 5.3 | 96 | 5.5 | 152 | 3.6 | 680 | 6.7 |
| Guassuty | 39 | 6.8 | 106 | 17.8 | 57 | 9.3 | 53 | 8.4 | 37 | 5.7 | 49 | 11.6 | 341 | 9.1 |
| Jaguari | 14 | 3.9 | 41 | 11 | 46 | 12 | 14 | 3.5 | 7 | 1.7 | 12 | 14.4 | 134 | 5.7 |
| Total | 623 | 4.8 | 747 | 5.6 | 691 | 5 | 724 | 5.1 | 653 | 4.5 | 610 | 0.7 | 4,048 | 4.8 |
| Incidence of pulmonary tuberculosis | ||||||||||||||
| Amambai | 11 | 148.1 | 24 | 313.7 | 18 | 228.4 | 16 | 197.1 | 20 | 239.3 | 16 | 185.8 | 105 | 218.6 |
| Taquaperi | 10 | 334.4 | 4 | 129.9 | 6 | 189.1 | 10 | 306.1 | 12 | 356.6 | 13 | 375 | 55 | 284.4 |
| Limão Verde | 5 | 320.3 | 4 | 248.8 | 7 | 422.7 | 8 | 469 | 8 | 455.3 | 11 | 607.9 | 43 | 425.9 |
| Guassuty | 7 | 1213.2 | 1 | 168.3 | 2 | 326.7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 154 | 1 | 149.5 | 12 | 321.5 |
| Jaguari | 1 | 277 | 9 | 2,420.50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 428.2 |
| Total | 34 | 263.2 | 42 | 315.7 | 33 | 240.8 | 34 | 240.9 | 41 | 282 | 41 | 273.8 | 225 | 269.3 |
| Bacilloscopy | ||||||||||||||
| Positive | 26 | 4.2 | 24 | 3.2 | 27 | 3.9 | 28 | 3.9 | 19 | 2.9 | 7 | 1.1 | 131 | 3.2 |
| Negative | 575 | 92.3 | 702 | 94 | 653 | 94.5 | 681 | 94.1 | 403 | 61.7 | 364 | 59.7 | 3,378 | 83.4 |
| Not performed | 22 | 3.5 | 21 | 2.8 | 11 | 1.6 | 15 | 2.1 | 231 | 35.4 | 239 | 39.2 | 539 | 13.3 |
| Total | 623 | 747 | 691 | 724 | 653 | 610 | 4,048 | |||||||
| Rapid molecular testing | ||||||||||||||
| Positive | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | 0.8 | 30 | 4.6 | 34 | 5.6 | 70 | 3.5 |
| Negative | - | - | - | - | - | - | 29 | 4 | 270 | 41.3 | 188 | 30.8 | 487 | 24.5 |
| Not performed | - | - | - | - | - | - | 689 | 95.2 | 353 | 54.1 | 388 | 63.6 | 1430 | 72 |
| Total | - | - | - | - | - | - | 724 | 653 | 610 | 1987 | ||||
| Culture | ||||||||||||||
| Positive | 34 | 5.5 | 42 | 5.6 | 33 | 4.8 | 34 | 4.7 | 41 | 6.3 | 41 | 6.7 | 225 | 5.6 |
| Negative | 252 | 40.4 | 540 | 72.3 | 473 | 68.5 | 547 | 75.6 | 449 | 68.8 | 441 | 72.3 | 2702 | 66.7 |
| Not performed | 267 | 42.9 | 91 | 12.2 | 111 | 16.1 | 77 | 10.6 | 88 | 13.5 | 44 | 7.2 | 678 | 16.7 |
| Nontuberculous mycobacteria | 1 | 0.2 | 7 | 0.9 | 10 | 1.4 | 1 | 0.1 | 3 | 0.5 | 6 | 1 | 28 | 0.7 |
| Contaminated | 69 | 11.1 | 67 | 9 | 64 | 9.3 | 65 | 9 | 72 | 11.1 | 68 | 11.1 | 405 | 10 |
| No results | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0.2 | 10 | 0.2 | |||||
| Total | 623 | 747 | 691 | 724 | 653 | 610 | 4048 | |||||||
Age group and gender of RSPs identified in the villages
| Amambai | Taquaperi | Limão Verde | Guassuty | Jaguari | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age group, years | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % |
| 0-10 | 83 | 4.4 | 72 | 7 | 29 | 4.3 | 16 | 4.7 | 1 | 0.7 | 201 | 5 |
| 10-20 | 324 | 17.4 | 150 | 14.6 | 114 | 16.8 | 26 | 7.6 | 34 | 25.4 | 648 | 16 |
| 20-40 | 752 | 40.3 | 424 | 41.3 | 302 | 44.5 | 132 | 38.7 | 64 | 47.8 | 1674 | 41.4 |
| 40-60 | 390 | 20.9 | 212 | 20.7 | 146 | 21.5 | 74 | 21.7 | 20 | 14.9 | 842 | 20.8 |
| 60 and + | 318 | 17 | 168 | 16.4 | 88 | 13 | 93 | 27.3 | 15 | 11.2 | 682 | 16.9 |
| Total | 1,867 | 1,026 | 679 | 341 | 134 | 4,047 | ||||||
| Gender | ||||||||||||
| Female | 1,071 | 57.4 | 537 | 52.3 | 331 | 48.7 | 202 | 59.2 | 73 | 54.5 | 2,214 | 54.7 |
| Male | 796 | 42.6 | 489 | 47.7 | 349 | 51.3 | 139 | 40.8 | 61 | 45.5 | 1,834 | 45.3 |
| Total | 1,867 | 1,026 | 680 | 341 | 134 | 4,048 | ||||||
Performance of bacilloscopy and rapid molecular testing (RMT) compared to sputum culture (standard test) in the first and second sputum samples, and in both samples combined
| All samples | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMT performance | Bacilloscopy performance | ||||||
| RMT | Positive | Negative | Total | Bacilloscopy | Positive | Negative | Total |
| Positive | 54 | 7 | 61 | Positive | 97 | 9 | 106 |
| Negative | 4 | 401 | 405 | Negative | 79 | 2,344 | 2,423 |
| Total | 58 | 408 | 466 | Total | 176 | 2,353 | 2,529 |
| Sensitivity | 93.1% | (83.5-97.2) | Sensitivity | 55.1% | (47.7-62.2) | ||
| Specificity | 98.3% | (96.5-99.2) | Specificity | 99.6% | (99.3-99.8) | ||
| Positive predictive value | 88.5% | Positive predictive value | 91.5% | ||||
| Negative predictive value | 99.0% | Negative predictive value | 96.7% | ||||
| First sample | |||||||
| Positive | 41 | 6 | 47 | Positive | 58 | 6 | 64 |
| Negative | 2 | 385 | 387 | Negative | 67 | 2,195 | 2,262 |
| Total | 43 | 391 | 434 | Total | 125 | 2,201 | 2,326 |
| Sensitivity | 95.3% | (84.5-98.7) | Sensitivity | 46.4% | (38.0-55.1) | ||
| Specificity | 98.5% | (96.7-99.3) | Specificity | 99.7% | (99.4-99.9) | ||
| Positive predictive value | 87.2% | Positive predictive value | 90.6% | ||||
| Negative predictive value | 99.5% | Negative predictive value | 97.0% | ||||
| Second sample | |||||||
| Positive | 13 | 1 | 14 | Positive | 38 | 3 | 41 |
| Negative | 2 | 15 | 17 | Negative | 10 | 132 | 142 |
| Total | 15 | 16 | 31 | Total | 48 | 135 | 183 |
| Sensitivity | 86.7% | (62.1-96.2) | Sensitivity | 79.9% | (65.7-88.2) | ||
| Specificity | 93.7% | (71.7-98.9) | Specificity | 97.9% | (93.7-99.2) | ||
| Positive predictive value | 92.9% | Positive predictive value | 92.7% | ||||
| Negative predictive value | 88.2% | Negative predictive value | 92.9% | ||||