Literature DB >> 31016597

Sarcoma Stem Cell Heterogeneity.

Jiri Hatina1, Michaela Kripnerova2, Katerina Houfkova2, Martin Pesta2, Jitka Kuncova3, Jiri Sana4, Ondrej Slaby4, René Rodríguez5,6.   

Abstract

Sarcomas represent an extensive group of divergent malignant diseases, with the only common characteristic of being derived from mesenchymal cells. As such, sarcomas are by definition very heterogeneous, and this heterogeneity does not manifest only upon intertumoral comparison on a bulk tumor level but can be extended to intratumoral level. Whereas part of this intratumoral heterogeneity could be understood in terms of clonal genetic evolution, an essential part includes a hierarchical relationship between sarcoma cells, governed by both genetic and epigenetic influences, signals that sarcoma cells are exposed to, and intrinsic developmental programs derived from sarcoma cells of origin. The notion of this functional hierarchy operating within each tumor implies the existence of sarcoma stem cells, which may originate from mesenchymal stem cells, and indeed, mesenchymal stem cells have been used to establish several crucial experimental sarcoma models and to trace down their respective stem cell populations. Mesenchymal stem cells themselves are heterogeneous, and, moreover, there are alternative possibilities for sarcoma cells of origin, like neural crest-derived stem cells, or mesenchymal committed precursor cells, or - in rhabdomyosarcoma - muscle satellite cells. These various origins result in substantial heterogeneity in possible sarcoma initiation. Genetic and epigenetic changes associated with sarcomagenesis profoundly impact the biology of sarcoma stem cells. For pediatric sarcomas featuring discrete reciprocal translocations and largely stable karyotypes, the translocation-activated oncogenes could be crucial factors that confer stemness, principally by modifying transcriptome and interfering with normal epigenetic regulation; the most extensively studied examples of this process are myxoid/round cell liposarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and synovial sarcoma. For adult sarcomas, which have typically complex and unstable karyotypes, stemness might be defined more operationally, as a reflection of actual assembly of genetically and epigenetically conditioned stemness factors, with dedifferentiated liposarcoma providing a most thoroughly studied example. Alternatively, stemness can be imposed by tumor microenvironment, as extensively documented in osteosarcoma. In spite of this heterogeneity in both sarcoma initiation and underlying stemness biology, some of the molecular mechanisms of stemness might be remarkably similar in diverse sarcoma types, like abrogation of classical tumor suppressors pRb and p53, activation of Sox-2, or inhibition of canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Moreover, even some stem cell markers initially characterized for their stem cell enrichment capacity in various carcinomas or leukemias seem to function quite similarly in various sarcomas. Understanding the biology of sarcoma stem cells could significantly improve sarcoma patient clinical care, leading to both better patient stratification and, hopefully, development of more effective therapeutic options.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chondrosarcoma; Dickkopf; Ewing sarcoma; Genetic and epigenetic plasticity; In vitro sarcoma progression models; Liposarcoma; Mesenchymal stem cells; Osteosarcoma; Sarcoma; Sarcoma cells of origin; Sarcoma stem cells; Sox-2; Synovial sarcoma; Wnt/β-catenin pathway; p53; pRb

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31016597     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11096-3_7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  13 in total

Review 1.  Latest developments in the pathobiology of Ewing sarcoma.

Authors:  Irina Karlina; Brett A Schroeder; Kirill Kirgizov; Olga Romantsova; Andrey L Istranov; Andrey Nedorubov; Peter Timashev; Ilya Ulasov
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.491

Review 2.  Sarcomas of the sellar region: a systematic review.

Authors:  Fernando Guerrero-Pérez; Noemi Vidal; Macarena López-Vázquez; Reinaldo Sánchez-Barrera; Juan José Sánchez-Fernández; Alberto Torres-Díaz; Nuria Vilarrasa; Carles Villabona
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 3.  Sarcoma treatment in the era of molecular medicine.

Authors:  Thomas Gp Grünewald; Marta Alonso; Sofia Avnet; Ana Banito; Stefan Burdach; Florencia Cidre-Aranaz; Gemma Di Pompo; Martin Distel; Heathcliff Dorado-Garcia; Javier Garcia-Castro; Laura González-González; Agamemnon E Grigoriadis; Merve Kasan; Christian Koelsche; Manuela Krumbholz; Fernando Lecanda; Silvia Lemma; Dario L Longo; Claudia Madrigal-Esquivel; Álvaro Morales-Molina; Julian Musa; Shunya Ohmura; Benjamin Ory; Miguel Pereira-Silva; Francesca Perut; Rene Rodriguez; Carolin Seeling; Nada Al Shaaili; Shabnam Shaabani; Kristina Shiavone; Snehadri Sinha; Eleni M Tomazou; Marcel Trautmann; Maria Vela; Yvonne Mh Versleijen-Jonkers; Julia Visgauss; Marta Zalacain; Sebastian J Schober; Andrej Lissat; William R English; Nicola Baldini; Dominique Heymann
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 12.137

4.  Mithramycin delivery systems to develop effective therapies in sarcomas.

Authors:  Óscar Estupiñán; Enrique Niza; Iván Bravo; Verónica Rey; Juan Tornín; Borja Gallego; Pilar Clemente-Casares; Francisco Moris; Alberto Ocaña; Verónica Blanco-Lorenzo; Mar Rodríguez-Santamaría; Aitana Vallina-Álvarez; M Victoria González; Aida Rodríguez; Daniel Hermida-Merino; Carlos Alonso-Moreno; René Rodríguez
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 10.435

5.  Complex Interplay of Genes Underlies Invasiveness in Fibrosarcoma Progression Model.

Authors:  Michaela Kripnerová; Hamendra Singh Parmar; Jiří Šána; Alena Kopková; Lenka Radová; Sieghart Sopper; Krzysztof Biernacki; Jan Jedlička; Michaela Kohoutová; Jitka Kuncová; Jan Peychl; Emil Rudolf; Miroslav Červinka; Zbyněk Houdek; Pavel Dvořák; Kateřina Houfková; Martin Pešta; Zdeněk Tůma; Martina Dolejšová; Filip Tichánek; Václav Babuška; Martin Leba; Ondřej Slabý; Jiří Hatina
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 6.  Cancer Stem Cells in Soft-Tissue Sarcomas.

Authors:  Paula Martínez-Delgado; Serena Lacerenza; Antonia Obrador-Hevia; Maria Lopez-Alvarez; José L Mondaza-Hernandez; Elena Blanco-Alcaina; Paloma Sanchez-Bustos; Nadia Hindi; David S Moura; Javier Martin-Broto
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  SOX2 Expression and Transcriptional Activity Identifies a Subpopulation of Cancer Stem Cells in Sarcoma with Prognostic Implications.

Authors:  Sofia T Menendez; Veronica Rey; Lucia Martinez-Cruzado; M Victoria Gonzalez; Alvaro Morales-Molina; Laura Santos; Verónica Blanco; Carlos Alvarez; Oscar Estupiñan; Eva Allonca; Juan Pablo Rodrigo; Javier García-Castro; Juana Maria Garcia-Pedrero; Rene Rodriguez
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 8.  The Role of IGF/IGF-IR-Signaling and Extracellular Matrix Effectors in Bone Sarcoma Pathogenesis.

Authors:  George N Tzanakakis; Eirini-Maria Giatagana; Aikaterini Berdiaki; Ioanna Spyridaki; Kyoko Hida; Monica Neagu; Aristidis M Tsatsakis; Dragana Nikitovic
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Olaratumab's failure in soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  Maroun Bou Zerdan; Aram H Bidikian; Ibrahim Alameh; Clara El Nakib; Hazem I Assi
Journal:  Rare Tumors       Date:  2021-07-18

10.  Empty spiracles homeobox genes EMX1 and EMX2 regulate WNT pathway activation in sarcomagenesis.

Authors:  Manuel Pedro Jimenez-García; Antonio Lucena-Cacace; Daniel Otero-Albiol; Amancio Carnero
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.