Osamu Togao1, Akio Hiwatashi2, Koji Yamashita3, Daichi Momosaka3, Makoto Obara4, Ataru Nishimura5, Koichi Arimura5, Nobuhiro Hata5, Koji Iihara5, Marc Van Cauteren4, Hiroshi Honda3. 1. Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan. togao@radiol.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp. 2. Department of Molecular Imaging & Diagnosis, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan. 3. Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan. 4. Philips Japan, 13-37, Kohnan 2-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8507, Japan. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of acceleration-selective arterial spin labeling (AccASL) MR angiography in the visualization of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with brain AVM (mean age 31.1 ± 18.6 years; 11 males, 10 females) underwent TOF and AccASL MR angiography and DSA. Two neuroradiologists conducted an observer study for detection, nidus size, eloquence, venous drainage pattern, and Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade. The evaluations included the visualization of each AVM component with reference to DSA and assessments of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The kappa statistic, repeated measures analysis of variance, Wilcoxon matched pairs test, and paired t test were used. RESULTS: Both observers detected more AVMs with AccASL (95.2%, 90.5% for Observers 1 and 2) than with TOF (76.2% and 71.4%, respectively). The inter-modality agreement between AccASL and DSA was almost perfect for the eloquence, venous drainage pattern, and SM grade for Observer 1 and moderate for the venous drainage pattern and substantial for the eloquence and SM grade for Observer 2. The visualization scores were higher with AccASL than with TOF for the feeding artery (AccASL, 4.5 ± 1.0 vs. TOF, 3.9 ± 1.5, p = 0.0214), nidus (4.6 ± 1.1 vs. 3.2 ± 1.5, p = 0.0006), and draining vein (4.6 ± 1.0 vs. 2.2 ± 1.1, p < 0.0001), respectively. The CNRs in the nidus were higher in AccASL than in TOF (29.9 ± 16.7 vs. 20.8 ± 16.5, p = 0.0002), as in the draining vein (23.2 ± 13.0 vs. 12.6 ± 12.0, p = 0.0010), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AccASL better visualized brain AVMs compared with TOF and was useful for grading without the use of contrast agents.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of acceleration-selective arterial spin labeling (AccASL) MR angiography in the visualization of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with brain AVM (mean age 31.1 ± 18.6 years; 11 males, 10 females) underwent TOF and AccASL MR angiography and DSA. Two neuroradiologists conducted an observer study for detection, nidus size, eloquence, venous drainage pattern, and Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade. The evaluations included the visualization of each AVM component with reference to DSA and assessments of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The kappa statistic, repeated measures analysis of variance, Wilcoxon matched pairs test, and paired t test were used. RESULTS: Both observers detected more AVMs with AccASL (95.2%, 90.5% for Observers 1 and 2) than with TOF (76.2% and 71.4%, respectively). The inter-modality agreement between AccASL and DSA was almost perfect for the eloquence, venous drainage pattern, and SM grade for Observer 1 and moderate for the venous drainage pattern and substantial for the eloquence and SM grade for Observer 2. The visualization scores were higher with AccASL than with TOF for the feeding artery (AccASL, 4.5 ± 1.0 vs. TOF, 3.9 ± 1.5, p = 0.0214), nidus (4.6 ± 1.1 vs. 3.2 ± 1.5, p = 0.0006), and draining vein (4.6 ± 1.0 vs. 2.2 ± 1.1, p < 0.0001), respectively. The CNRs in the nidus were higher in AccASL than in TOF (29.9 ± 16.7 vs. 20.8 ± 16.5, p = 0.0002), as in the draining vein (23.2 ± 13.0 vs. 12.6 ± 12.0, p = 0.0010), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AccASL better visualized brain AVMs compared with TOF and was useful for grading without the use of contrast agents.
Entities:
Keywords:
Acceleration-selective arterial spin labeling; Arteriovenous malformations; Brain; Magnetic resonance angiography; Magnetic resonance imaging
Authors: O Togao; M Obara; K Kikuchi; M Helle; K Arimura; A Nishimura; T Wada; H Murazaki; M Van Cauteren; A Hiwatashi; K Ishigami Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 3.825