| Literature DB >> 31015896 |
Jung Dae Lee1, Joo Young Lee2, Seung Jun Kwack3, Chan Young Shin4, Hyun-Jun Jang5, Hyang Yeon Kim5, Min Kook Kim1, Dong-Wan Seo5, Byung-Mu Lee1, Kyu-Bong Kim5.
Abstract
Triclosan (TCS) is an antimicrobial compound used in consumer products. The purpose of current study was to examine toxicology and risk assessment of TCS based on available data. Acute toxicities of oral, transdermal and inhalation routes were low, and phototoxicity and neurotoxicity were not observed. Topical treatment of TCS to animal caused mild irritation. TCS did not induce reproductive and developmental toxicity in rodents. In addition, genotoxicity was not considered based on in vitro and in vivo tests of TCS. It is not classified as a carcinogen in international authorities such as International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). No-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) was determined 12 mg/kg bw/day for TCS, based on haematoxicity and reduction of absolute and relative spleen weights in a 104-week oral toxicity study in rats. Percutaneous absorption rate was set as 14%, which was human skin absorption study reported by National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme (NICNAS) (2009). The systemic exposure dosage (SED) of TCS has been derived by two scenarios depending on the cosmetics usage of Koreans. The first scenario is the combined use of representative cosmetics and oral care products. The second scenario is the combined use of rinse-off products of cleansing, deodorants, coloring products, and oral care products. SEDs have been calculated as 0.14337 mg/kg bw/day for the first scenario and 0.04733 mg/kg bw/day for the second scenario. As a result, margin of safety (MOS) for the first and second scenarios was estimated to 84 and 253.5, respectively. Based on these results, exposure of TCS contained in rinse-off products, deodorants, and coloring products would not pose a significant health risk when it is used up to 0.3%.Entities:
Keywords: Cosmetic ingredients; Rinse-off products; Risk assessment; Triclosan
Year: 2019 PMID: 31015896 PMCID: PMC6467355 DOI: 10.5487/TR.2019.35.2.137
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Res ISSN: 1976-8257
Physical and chemical properties of triclosan
| Property | Value and conditions |
| INCI name | Triclosan |
| IUPAC name | 5-Chloro-2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenol |
| CAS No. | 3380-34-5 |
| Molecular formula | C12H7Cl3O2 |
| Molar mass | 289.54 g/mol |
| Chemical structure |
|
| Physical state and odor | White to off-white crystalline powder, Slight, faintly aromatic odor |
| Melting point | 55–57°C |
| Boiling point | 280–290°C (decompose) |
| Density | 1.49 g/cm3 |
| Water solubility | 0.012 g/L at 20°C |
| Log Pow | 4.76 |
| Synonyms | 2,4,4′-Trichloro-2′-hydroxy-diphenyl ether |
Triclosan regulations of cosmetics in various countries
| Usage | Korea | Europe | Japan | USA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sterilization and Preservative | Rinse-off: body cleansing products, Deodorant (excluding spray products), Used locally: foundation to hide skin defects (ex. blemish concealers) | Body soap, hand soap, shower gel, deodorant, pate powder, blemish concealer ≤ 0.3% | ≤ 0.1% | Soap and deodorant ≤ 0.3% |
| Toothpaste ≤ 0.3%, Mouthwash ≤ 0.2% |
Summary of acute toxicity of triclosan
| Route | Species | Dose | Results | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oral | Rat | 5,000 mg/kg bw/day | LD50 > 5000 | |
| Inhalation | Rat | 0.123, 0.466, 0.513, 0.678 mg/L air/day | LC50 | |
| Dermal | Rabbit | 0, 1,000, 6,000 mg/kg bw/day | LD50 |
LD50, 50% lethal dose.
Summary of skin and mucosal irritation tests of triclosan
| Test methods | Species | Dose | Results | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single patch test | Human | 0.3% | No skin irritation | |
| Exposure test | Guinea pig | 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5% | After 24 hr, 4/10 animals showed erythema | |
| Exposure test | Mouse | 1.5–6% | Erythema and peeling of skin | |
| Exposure test | Rat | 1, 2% | Erythema, edema, cracks, scabs, hair loss, thickening of the skin, and discoloration | |
| Exposure test | Rat | 0.5% | Showed reversible skin irritation | |
| Exposure test | Hamster | 0.3% | No mucosal irritation | |
| Draize test | Rabbit | 0.1 g | Irritation in cornea, iris, and conjunctiva |
Summary of skin sensitization tests of triclosan
| Test methods | Species | Dose | Results | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patch, Draize, maximization test | Human | 5–20% | The degree of skin reaction was not different from that of the control group | |
| Occluded patch test | Guinea pig | 0.1% | Test group and negative control showed similar responses | |
| Occluded patch test | Guinea pig | 10% | 7/20 animals showed some erythema but no edema |
Summary of reproductive and developmental toxicity studies of triclosan
| Route | Species | Exposure period | Dose | Results | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oral | Rat | 10 weeks prior to mating (2 generations) | Male: 17, 56, 176 mg/kg bw/day | NOAEL 56–73 mg/kg bw/day | |
| Oral | Rat | 8th day before pregnancy to post-natal day 21 | 1, 10, 50 mg/kg bw/day | Decreased male/female ratio at doses of 1 mg/ kg bw/day | |
| Oral | Mouse | 6–15 days during pregnancy | 10, 25, 75, 350 mg/ kg bw/day | Maternal and fetal NOEL was 25 mg/kg bw/day |
Summary of carcinogenicity studies of triclosan
| Route | Species | Exposure period | Dose | Results | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oral | Mouse | 18 months | 10, 30, 100, 200 mg/kg bw/day | Adenomas or carcinomas were observed in the liver in 6, 10, 17, 32, and 42 males, respectively and 0, 1, 3, 6, and 20 females, respectively. | |
| Oral | Hamster | 90–95 weeks | 12.5, 75, 250 mg/kg bw/day | Increased mortality and nephropathy at doses of 250 mg/kg bw/day | |
| Dermal | Mouse | 18 months | 0.5, 1% | No carcinogenicity |
Summary of percutaneous absorption rates of triclosan
| Species | Route | Exposure period | Dose | Absorption | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rat | Dermal | 48 hr | 0.2 mL ethanol containing 162 μg of triclosan was applied to 7.5 cm2 of clipped dorsal female rat skin. | 28% | |
| 0.1 mL of 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0% (w/v) solutions of shampoo were applied to 7.5cm2 of skin. | 3–4% | ||||
| 0.1% (w/v) solution of deodorant was sprayed for 2 sec at distance of 15 cm on 7.5cm2 of back skin. | 52% | ||||
| Rat | Dermal | 96 hr | The vehicle were solvents (ethanol, acetone), the exact dosage is unknown. | 93% | |
| 48 hr | The vehicle was cream, the exact dosage is unknown. | 23% | |||
| 144 hr | The vehicle was vaseline, the exact dosage is unknown. | 73% | |||
| Rat | Dermal | 24 hr | 100 mL of 64.5 mM triclosan solution (6.92 MBq) was applied to 9.6cm2 of skin. | 21% | |
| Rat | Dermal | 72 hr | The vehicle was a soap suspension, the exact dosage is unknown. | 28% | |
| Human | Oral epithelium | - | Exact dose not applicable when dosing with common toothpaste | 5–10% | |
| Full thickness human skin | Dermal | - | The exact dosage is unknown. | Dishwashing liquid: 12%, water/oil emulsion: 11.3%, deodorant: 7.65%, soap solution: 7.2% | |
| Human | Dermal | 8 hr | Exposed skin area for both hands or a hand and a forearm was 1,000 cm2 . | 14% |
Summary of NOAELs for triclosan
| Test methods | Animal | Route | Duration of treatment | Dose | Test items | Results | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repeated dose | Mouse | Diet | 28 day | 50, 1,000 ppm (male: 6.48, 113 mg/kg/ day, female: 8.28, 169 mg/kg/day) | Hematological observation, Histological observation | Increased ALT, AST activity in males at 50 ppm, decreased phosphate in females | |
| Repeated dose | Syrian hamster | Diet | 13 weeks | 0, 75, 200, 350, 750, 900 mg/kg bw/day | Dietary intake, Hematological observation, Histological observation | Kidney discoloration, granule formation, renal toxicity observed at 750, 900 mg/kg bw/day | |
| Repeated dose | Baboon monkey | - | 1 year | - | Macroscopy, Hematological observation, Histological observation | Hemoglobin and clinical chemistry changes were observed during the administration period of 300 mg/kg bw/day, but no histological changes were observed. | |
| Repeated dose | Rat | Diet | 104 weeks | 0, 300, 1,000, 3,000 ppm (male: 0, 12, 40, 127 mg/ kg bw/day female: 0, 17, 56, 190 mg/ kg bw/day) | Hematological observation, Histological observation, Clinical pathologic observation | Hematological changes, increased concentration of hemoglobin response to 1,000, 3,000 ppm in females and 300 ppm in males, increased coagulation time in high-dose group males, WBC reduction in females | 3,42 |
| Repeated dose | Syrian hamster | Diet | 95 weeks | 12.5, 75, 250 mg/kg/day | Hematological observation, Histological observation | At 250 mg/kg bw/day, increase in drinking water intake, increase in mean particulate blood pigment concentration, increase in reticulocyte count, platelet reduction |
ALT, Alanine aminotransferase; AST, Aspartate aminotransferase; NOAEL, No-observed-adverse-effect level; LOAEL, Lowest-observed-adverse-effect level; WBC, White blood cell; SCCP, Scientific Committee on Consumer Products of the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Health and Consumer Protection.
Systemic exposure dose (SED) of triclosan from cosmetic products in Koreans
| Products | Triclosan content (%) | Amount of cosmetics applied (g/day) | Dermal or oral absorption rate (%) | Adult weight (kg) | SED (mg/kg bw/day) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Representative type cosmetics | 0.3 | 16.9 | 14 | 60 | 0.11830 | |
| Toothpaste | 0.3 | 0.168 | 100 | 0.00840 | ||
| Mouthwash | 0.02 | 5 | 0.01667 | |||
| Total of representative type cosmetics + Toothpaste + Mouthwash | 0.14337 | |||||
| Rinse-off products (body cleansing products) | Shower gel | 0.3 | 0.10 | 14 | 60 | 0.00070 |
| Hand wash soap | 0.24 | 0.00168 | ||||
| Deodorant | 2.33 | 0.01631 | ||||
| Color cosmetic products (Except for eye and lip products) | Liquid foundation | 0.30 | 0.00210 | |||
| Liquid foundation | 0.21 | 0.00147 | ||||
| Toothpaste | 0.3 | 0.168 | 100 | 0.00840 | ||
| Mouthwash | 0.02 | 5 | 0.01667 | |||
| Total of rinse-off products + deodorant + color cosmetic products + Toothpaste + Mouthwash | 0.04733 | |||||
Use toothpaste 3.36 g/day × residual index 0.05 (101).
Use mouthwash 50 g/day × residual index 0.1 (User’s manual, 8).
Risk characterization
| Products | Triclosan concentration (%) | SED (mg/kg bw/day) | NOAEL (mg/kg bw/day) | MOS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Representative type cosmetics + Toothpaste + Mouthwash | Representative type cosmetics | 0.3 | 0.143367 | 12 | 83.7 |
| Toothpaste | 0.3 | ||||
| Mouthwash | 0.02 | ||||
| Rinse-off body cleaning products + deodorant + color cosmetic products (except for eye and lip products) + Toothpaste + Mouthwash | Cosmetics | 0.3 | 0.04733 | 12 | 253.5 |
| Toothpaste | 0.3 | ||||
| Mouthwash | 0.02 | ||||
MOS = NOAEL ÷ SED ≥ 100: acceptable risk.