Literature DB >> 31015226

Statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: modelling guidelines and patient preferences based on an Irish cohort.

Paula Byrne1, John Cullinan1, Paddy Gillespie2, Rafael Perera3, Susan M Smith4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Changes in clinical guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) have widened eligibility for statin therapy. AIM: To illustrate the potential impacts of changes in clinical guidelines. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Modelling the impacts of seven consecutive European guidelines based on a cohort of people aged ≥50 years from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing.
METHOD: The eligibility for statin therapy of a sample of people without a history of CVD was established, according to changing guideline recommendations and modelled associated potential costs. The authors calculated the numbers needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one major vascular event in patients at the lowest baseline risk for which each of the seven guidelines recommended treatment, and for those at low, medium, high, and very-high risk according to 2016 guidelines. These were compared with the NNT that patients reported as required to justify taking a daily medicine.
RESULTS: The proportion of patients eligible for statins increased from approximately 8% in 1987 to 61% in 2016; associated costs rose from €13.9 million to €107.1 million per annum. The NNT for those at the lowest risk for which each guideline recommended treatment rose from 40 to 400. By 2016, the NNT for low-risk patients was 400 compared to ≤25 very-high risk patients. The proportion of patients eligible for statins achieving NNT levels that patients regarded as justified to taking a daily medicine fell as guidelines changed over time.
CONCLUSION: Increased eligibility for statin therapy impacts large proportions of the present population and healthcare budgets. Decisions to take and reimburse statins should be considered on the basis of expected cost-effectiveness and acceptability to patients. © British Journal of General Practice 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  drug costs; guideline; hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors, patient preference; primary prevention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31015226      PMCID: PMC6532821          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X702701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  35 in total

1.  Are lipid-lowering guidelines evidence-based?

Authors:  J Abramson; J M Wright
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-01-20       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Driving forces behind increasing cardiovascular drug utilization: a dynamic pharmacoepidemiological model.

Authors:  Helle Wallach Kildemoes; Henrik Støvring; Morten Andersen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Proportion and risk indicators of nonadherence to statin therapy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mark Lemstra; David Blackburn; Alex Crawley; Ryan Fung
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  Growth in use of statins after trials is not targeted to most appropriate patients.

Authors:  J Feely; P McGettigan; A Kelly
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 5.  A systematic review on communicating with patients about evidence.

Authors:  Lyndal J Trevena; Heather M Davey; Alexandra Barratt; Phyllis Butow; Patrina Caldwell
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 6.  Lipid-lowering treatment to the end? A review of observational studies and RCTs on cholesterol and mortality in 80+-year olds.

Authors:  Line Kirkeby Petersen; Kaare Christensen; Jakob Kragstrup
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 10.668

7.  Trends in prescribing and utilization of statins and other lipid lowering drugs across Europe 1997-2003.

Authors:  T Walley; P Folino-Gallo; P Stephens; E Van Ganse
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 8.  Efficacy and safety of statin monotherapy in older adults: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caroline G P Roberts; Eliseo Guallar; Annabelle Rodriguez
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.053

9.  Evolution of statin prescribing 1994-2001: a case of agism but not of sexism?

Authors:  S DeWilde; I M Carey; S A Bremner; N Richards; S R Hilton; D G Cook
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials.

Authors:  B Mihaylova; J Emberson; L Blackwell; A Keech; J Simes; E H Barnes; M Voysey; A Gray; R Collins; C Baigent
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Paula Byrne; John Cullinan; Amelia Smith; Susan M Smith
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Guideline Concordance of Statin Treatment Decisions: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yael Rachamin; Stefan Markun; Thomas Grischott; Thomas Rosemann; Rahel Meier
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.