Literature DB >> 31015141

QMRA of adenovirus in drinking water at a drinking water treatment plant using UV and chlorine dioxide disinfection.

Jack Schijven1, Peter Teunis2, Trudy Suylen3, Henk Ketelaars3, Luc Hornstra4, Saskia Rutjes5.   

Abstract

According to the Dutch Drinking Water Act of 2011, Dutch drinking water suppliers must conduct a Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA) for infection by the following index pathogens: enterovirus, Campylobacter, Cryptosporidium and Giardia at least once every four years in order to assess the microbial safety of drinking water. The health-based target for safe drinking water is set at less than one infection per 10 000 persons per year. At Evides Water Company, concern has arisen whether their drinking water treatment, mainly based on UV inactivation and chlorine dioxide, reduces levels of adenovirus (AdV) sufficiently. The main objective was, therefore, to conduct a QMRA for AdV. Estimates of the AdV concentrations in source water were based on enumeration of total AdV by integrated cell culture PCR (iccPCR), most probable number PCR (mpnPCR) and quantitative PCR (qPCR), and on enumeration of AdV40/41 by mpnPCR and qPCR. AdV40/41 represents a large fraction of total AdV and only a small fraction of AdV is infectious (1/1700). By comparison of literature data and plant scale data, somatic coliphages appeared a good, conservative indicator for AdV disinfection by UV irradiation. Similarly, bacteriophage MS2 appeared to be a good, conservative indicator for disinfection by chlorine dioxide. Literature data on the efficiency of chlorine dioxide disinfection were fitted with the extended HOM model. Chlorine dioxide disinfection at low initial concentrations (0.05-0.1 mg/l) was found to be the major treatment step, providing sufficient treatment on its own for compliance with the health-based target. UV disinfection of AdV at 40 mJ/cm2 or 73 mJ/cm2 was insufficient without chlorine dioxide disinfection.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenovirus; Chlorine dioxide disinfection; Drinking water; PCR; QMRA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31015141     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of rotavirus and norovirus emitted from water spray park: QMRA, diseases burden and sensitivity analysis.

Authors:  Hasan Pasalari; Hesam Akbari; Angila Ataei-Pirkooh; Amir Adibzadeh; Hamed Akbari
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-10-07

Review 2.  Comparative effectiveness of membrane technologies and disinfection methods for virus elimination in water: A review.

Authors:  Chao Chen; Lihui Guo; Yu Yang; Kumiko Oguma; Li-An Hou
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Preparation and bacteriostatic research of porous polyvinyl alcohol / biochar / nanosilver polymer gel for drinking water treatment.

Authors:  Hang Zhao; Xuexiang Li; Liang Zhang; Zhihui Hu; Lvling Zhong; Juanqin Xue
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The occurrence and control of waterborne viruses in drinking water treatment: A review.

Authors:  Li Chen; Yang Deng; Shengkun Dong; Hong Wang; Pan Li; Huaiyu Zhang; Wenhai Chu
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 7.086

5.  Comparison of disinfection by-products formed by preoxidation of sulfamethazine by K2FeO4 and O3 and the influence on cytotoxicity and biological toxicity.

Authors:  Siwen Li; Yingzi Lin; Gaoqi Wang; Suiyi Zhu; Gen Liu; Chunyan Shi; Lei Chen
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 5.545

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.