Huiqiong Deng1,2, Pratikkumar V Desai1,2, Satyajit Mohite1,2, Olaoluwa O Okusaga3,4, Xiang Yang Zhang2, David A Nielsen3,4, Thomas R Kosten3,4. 1. Harris County Psychiatric Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas. 3. Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 4. Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The use of synthetic cannabinoid (SC) products has become popular in recent years, but data regarding their impact on hospital stays are limited. The impact of SC and cannabis use on hospital length of stay and doses of antipsychotics at discharge was assessed in this study. METHOD: The sample consisted of inpatients with discharge diagnoses of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or other psychotic disorders. Medical records of patients with self-reported SC use and negative urine drug screens (SC group, n = 77), with cannabis use confirmed by urine drug screen (cannabis group, n = 248), and with no drug use confirmed by urine drug screen (no-drug group, n = 1,336) were examined retrospectively. RESULTS: Length of stay (mean [SD] days) significantly differed (p < .001) among the SC (8.29 [4.29]), cannabis (8.02 [5.21]), and no-drug groups (10.19 [9.08]). Antipsychotic doses (chlorpromazine milligram equivalent doses) also significantly differed (p = .002) among the SC (254.64 [253.63]), cannabis (219.16 [216.71]), and no-drug groups (294.79 [287.85]). Unadjusted and adjusted pairwise comparisons showed that the cannabis group had a shorter length of stay (p < .001) and received lower doses of antipsychotics (p = .003) than the no-drug group. SC users did not differ significantly from the other two groups in either length of stay or doses of antipsychotics. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that acute SC exposure is not predictive of a more prolonged time for response to antipsychotic medications or of a need for larger doses of these medications compared with cannabis users.
OBJECTIVE: The use of synthetic cannabinoid (SC) products has become popular in recent years, but data regarding their impact on hospital stays are limited. The impact of SC and cannabis use on hospital length of stay and doses of antipsychotics at discharge was assessed in this study. METHOD: The sample consisted of inpatients with discharge diagnoses of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or other psychotic disorders. Medical records of patients with self-reported SC use and negative urine drug screens (SC group, n = 77), with cannabis use confirmed by urine drug screen (cannabis group, n = 248), and with no drug use confirmed by urine drug screen (no-drug group, n = 1,336) were examined retrospectively. RESULTS: Length of stay (mean [SD] days) significantly differed (p < .001) among the SC (8.29 [4.29]), cannabis (8.02 [5.21]), and no-drug groups (10.19 [9.08]). Antipsychotic doses (chlorpromazine milligram equivalent doses) also significantly differed (p = .002) among the SC (254.64 [253.63]), cannabis (219.16 [216.71]), and no-drug groups (294.79 [287.85]). Unadjusted and adjusted pairwise comparisons showed that the cannabis group had a shorter length of stay (p < .001) and received lower doses of antipsychotics (p = .003) than the no-drug group. SC users did not differ significantly from the other two groups in either length of stay or doses of antipsychotics. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that acute SC exposure is not predictive of a more prolonged time for response to antipsychotic medications or of a need for larger doses of these medications compared with cannabis users.
Authors: Theresa H M Moore; Stanley Zammit; Anne Lingford-Hughes; Thomas R E Barnes; Peter B Jones; Margaret Burke; Glyn Lewis Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-07-28 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: M Rinaldi-Carmona; F Pialot; C Congy; E Redon; F Barth; A Bachy; J C Brelière; P Soubrié; G Le Fur Journal: Life Sci Date: 1996 Impact factor: 5.037
Authors: Stanley Zammit; Theresa H M Moore; Anne Lingford-Hughes; Thomas R E Barnes; Peter B Jones; Margaret Burke; Glyn Lewis Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Lisa K Brents; Emily E Reichard; Sarah M Zimmerman; Jeffery H Moran; William E Fantegrossi; Paul L Prather Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-07-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Arianna Marconi; Marta Di Forti; Cathryn M Lewis; Robin M Murray; Evangelos Vassos Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2016-02-15 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Marta Di Forti; Hannah Sallis; Fabio Allegri; Antonella Trotta; Laura Ferraro; Simona A Stilo; Arianna Marconi; Caterina La Cascia; Tiago Reis Marques; Carmine Pariante; Paola Dazzan; Valeria Mondelli; Alessandra Paparelli; Anna Kolliakou; Diana Prata; Fiona Gaughran; Anthony S David; Craig Morgan; Daniel Stahl; Mizanur Khondoker; James H MacCabe; Robin M Murray Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 9.306