| Literature DB >> 31014158 |
Juan Jin1, Qiudi Tu1, Jianguang Gong1, Li Zhao1, Shikai Liang1, Qiang He1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify the significance of autophagy in lupus nephritis (LN).Entities:
Keywords: Atg7; Autophagy; LC3; ULK1; beclin-1; podocyte
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31014158 PMCID: PMC6493218 DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2019.1598432
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ren Fail ISSN: 0886-022X Impact factor: 2.606
Relationship between LN pathological types and clinical manifestations.
| Clinical data | LN pathological types | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type II ( | Type III ( | Type IV ( | Type V ( | Type V + III ( | Type V + IV ( | ||
| Gender | |||||||
| Male | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 |
| Female | 14 | 14 | 13 | 12 | 15 | 13 | 81 |
| Age (year) | 26.2 ± 9.9 | 28.4 ± 10.5 | 28.7 ± 11.5 | 33.3 ± 10.5 | 25.40 ± 10.7 | 33.6 ± 11.9 | 30.5 ± 10.5 |
| Clinical type | |||||||
| Occult nephritis | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Nephritic syndrome | 7 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 35 |
| Nephrotic syndrome | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 10 | 42 |
| Rapidly progressing glomerulonephritis | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Total | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 90 |
Renal manifestations of patients.
| II ( | III ( | IV ( | V ( | V + III ( | V + IV ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypertension | 2 (13.3) | 4 (26.7) | 7 (46.7) | 3 (20.0) | 4 (26.7) | 7 (46.7) |
| Hematuria | 3 (20.0) | 9 (60.0) | 12 (80.0) | 5 (33.3) | 10 (66.7) | 12 (80.0) |
| Macrohematuria | 0 | 1 (6.7) | 2 (13.3) | 0 | 1 (6.7) | 1 (6.7) |
| Urine protein ≥ 0.5 g/day | 11 (73.3) | 13 (86.7) | 14 (93.3) | 14 (93.3) | 14 (93.3) | 15 (100.0) |
| sCr ≥1.3 mg/dL | 0 | 1 (6.7) | 5 (33.3) | 1 (6.7) | 2 (13.3) | 4 (26.7) |
For each data in the table, the number outside the parentheses was the number of the patients positive for the specific manifestation; the number inside the parentheses was the percentage of the patients positive for the specific manifestation in each classification group.
The serum autoantibody manifestations of patients.
| II ( | III ( | IV ( | V ( | V + III ( | V + IV ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANA | 14 (93.3) | 12 (80.0) | 14 (93.3) | 11 (73.3) | 13 (86.7) | 13 (86.7) |
| A-dsDNA | 7 (46.7) | 7 (46.7) | 10 (66.7) | 4 (26.7) | 5 (33.3) | 9 (60.0) |
| A-Sm | 4 (26.7) | 3 (20.0) | 4 (26.7) | 3 (20.0) | 3 (20.0) | 3 (20.0) |
| A-RNP | 4 (26.7) | 4 (26.7) | 4 (26.7) | 3 (20.0) | 6 (40.0) | 4 (26.7) |
| ANCA | 0 | 1 (6.7) | 1 (6.7) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SSA | 4 (26.7) | 7 (46.7) | 5 (33.3) | 6 (40.0) | 6 (40.0) | 6 (40.0) |
| SSB | 1 (6.7) | 3 (20.0) | 2 (13.3) | 2 (13.3) | 3 (20.0) | 2 (20.0) |
| Low C3 | 8 (53.3) | 11 (73.3) | 12 (80.0) | 8 (53.3) | 11 (73.3) | 13 (86.7) |
| Low C4 | 2 (13.3) | 7 (46.7) | 7 (46.7) | 2 (13.3) | 3 (20.0) | 7 (46.7) |
For each data in the table, the number outside the parentheses was the number of the patients positive for the specific manifestation; the number inside the parentheses was the percentage of the patients positive for the specific manifestation in each classification group.
The comparison of the data for the podocyte fusion between different pathological classifications of LN.
| The data for the podocyte fusion in different types of LN | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | II ( | III ( | IV ( | V ( | V + III ( | V + IV ( |
| Mean ± SD | 57.0 ± 10.8 | 29.7 ± 7.4 | 42.0 ± 12.5 | 60.7 ± 16.8 | 55.0 ± 11.0 | 56.3 ± 13.3 |
| Comparison between groups ( | ||||||
| Type | II | III | IV | V | V + III | V + IV |
| II | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.175 | 0.620 | 0.881 | |
| III | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| IV | 0.002 | 0.005 | 0.005 | |||
| V | 0.284 | 0.440 | ||||
| V + III | 0.767 | |||||
All date expressed as number (percentage).
Autophagosomes in podocytes from LN patients.
| Group | Number | Autophagosomes/podocyte |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 15 | 3 (2, 5) |
| LN | 90 | 3 (2, 5) |
| Type II | 15 | 2 (1, 2) |
| Type III | 15 | 5 (3, 6) |
| Type IV | 15 | 4 (3, 5) |
| Type V | 15 | 2 (1, 2) |
| Type V–III | 15 | 3 (3, 4) |
| Type V–IV | 15 | 4 (3, 5) |
The data were demonstrated in the form of M(P25, P75).
Figure 1.Quantification of podocytes containing autophagosomes in kidney sections from 90 LN patients and 15 healthy controls; the percentage of autophagosome-positive podocytes in LN biopsies was significantly higher than in controls (p < 0.0001).
Figure 2.Autophagosomes (arrows) detected by EM in the podocytes of LN patients and controls.
Figure 3.The comparison of the number of autophagosomes in podocytes between the various types of LN.
Figure 4.Representative findings on immunohistochemical staining of renal biopsy specimens from patients with LN with antibodies against Beclin1, microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3), and UNC-51-like kinase 1 (ULK1) autophagy-related gene 7 (Atg7). The arrows pointed to the positive signals.
Correlation of biomarkers associated with autophagy in the various LN types.
| Variables | Beclin 1 expression (%) | LC3 expression (%) | ULK1 expression (%) | ATG7 expression (%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weak | Strong | Weak | Strong | Weak | Strong | Weak | Strong | |||||
| Control | 10 (66.7) | 5 (33.3) | 11 (73.3) | 4 (26.7) | 9 (60.0) | 6 (40.0) | 11 (73.3) | 4 (26.7) | ||||
| LN II type | 14 (93.3) | 1 (6.7) | 0.042 | 15 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.1000 | 15 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.017 | 15 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.1000 |
| LN III type | 3 (20.0) | 12 (80.0) | 0.025 | 4 (26.7) | 11 (73.3) | 0.027 | 2 (13.3) | 13 (86.7) | 0.021 | 3 (20.0) | 12 (80.0) | 0.009 |
| LN IV type | 1 (6.7) | 14 (93.3) | 0.002 | 0 (0.0) | 15 (100.0) | <0.0001 | 2 (13.3) | 13 (86.7) | 0.021 | 1 (6.7) | 14 (93.3) | <0.0001 |
| LN V type | 15 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.042 | 15 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.1000 | 15 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.017 | 14 (93.3) | 1 (6.7) | 0.330 |
| LN V + III type | 11 (73.3) | 4 (26.7) | 1.000 | 10 (66.7) | 3 (20.0) | 1.000 | 12 (80.0) | 3 (20.0) | 0.427 | 11 (73.3) | 4 (26.7) | 1.000 |
| LN V + IV type | 3 (20.0) | 12 (80.0) | 0.025 | 3 (20.0) | 12 (80.0) | 0.009 | 1 (6.7) | 14 (93.3) | 0.005 | 2 (13.3) | 13 (86.7) | 0.003 |
For each data in the table, the number outside the parentheses was the number of the patients positive for the specific proteins; the number inside the parentheses was the percentage of the patients positive for the specific proteins in each classification group.