| Literature DB >> 31013898 |
Alei Dang1,2, Zhao Zhao3,4, Chen Tang5, Chenglin Fang6, Siyuan Kong7, Muhammad Khan8,9, Tiehu Li10,11, Tingkai Zhao12,13, Hao Li14,15.
Abstract
A novel high-performance carbon foam (CF) was fabricated through the addition of phenolic resin (PR) into a coal tar pitch (CTP) based precursor. The effects of mass fraction of a PR additive on the crystalline structures, morphologies, compressive strength (σ) and thermal conductivity (λ) of resultant CF material were investigated systematically. Characterization showed a strong dependence of CF's performance from the composition and optical texture of the precursor, which were mainly depending on the polycondensation and polymerization reactions between PR and raw CTP. Comparing with the strength of pristine CF at 6.5 MPa, the σ of mCF-9 (13.1 MPa) was remarkably enhanced by 100.1%. However, the λ of mCF-9 substantially reduced to 0.9 m-1K-1 compared with 18.2 W m-1K-1 of pristine CF. Thus, this modification strategy to produce microporous CF materials from raw CTP provides a new protocol for the fabrication of high-performance carbon based materials.Entities:
Keywords: carbon foam; mechanical properties; modification; phenolic resin; pyrolysis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31013898 PMCID: PMC6514764 DOI: 10.3390/ma12081213
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Solubility class separation of the CTP and modified CTP by sequential Soxhlet extraction.
| Samples | TS (wt%) a | QI (wt%) b |
|---|---|---|
| CTP | 79.2 | 3.9 |
| CTP-1 | 77.4 | 4.4 |
| CTP-3 | 75.8 | 5.8 |
| CTP-5 | 74.8 | 6.5 |
| CTP-7 | 75.8 | 5.6 |
| CTP-9 | 76.4 | 5.3 |
a, Toluene Soluble; b, Quinoline Insoluble.
Figure 1Comparison of FT-IR spectra of pristine CF and modified mCF-5.
Figure 2The polarized photomicrograph of mosophase of raw CTP (a), mCTP-1 (b), mCTP-5 (c) and m-CTP-9 (d) materials at 500 °C for 2 h, respectively. Scale bar are 5 μm for all.
Figure 3XRD patterns (a) and Raman spectra (b) of CF and modified CF-5.
XRD d-spacing values, graphitization degree and Raman ID/IG ratios of pristine CF and mCF-5, respectively.
| Sample ID | XRD | Graphitization Degree (%) | Raman ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pristine CF | 0.352 | 93.02 | 0.51 |
| mCF-5 | 0.350 | 69.80 | 0.99 |
λ (Cu Kα) = 0.15406 nm.
Figure 4SEM images of pristine CF from raw CTP and as-prepared mCF materials from modified CTP. (a) pristine CF from CTP. (b–f) are sample mCF-1, mCF-3, mCF-5, mCF-7 and mCF-9 resulting from mCTP-1, mCTP-3, mCTP-5, mCTP-7 and mCTP-9, respectively. Scale bar is 500 μm for all.
Figure 5The thickness of as-prepared foams’ ligament varies with increase of amount of additive PR, where the thickness of ligament is 69.6 ± 11.2 μm for 0 wt% PR, 142.4 ± 21.6 μm for 1 wt%, 151.2 ± 14.4 μm for 3 wt%, 188.1 ± 11.3 μm for 5 wt%, 197.8 ± 30.7 μm for 7 wt% and 238.5 ± 38.2 μm for 9 wt%, respectively.
Summaries of bulk density and compressive strength of the pristine CF, mCF-1, mCF-5 and mCF-9.
| Samples | Amount of Additive of PR (wt%) | Bulk Density (g/cm3) | Compressive Strength (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pristine CF | 0 | 0.53 ± 0.1 | 6.5 ± 0.7 |
| mCF-1 | 1 | 0.64 ± 0.1 | 9.3 ± 1.2 |
| mCF-5 | 5 | 0.72 ± 0.1 | 12.8 ± 0.5 |
| mCF-9 | 9 | 0.74 ± 0.1 | 13.1 ± 0.6 |
Figure 6Comparison of compression strength of pristine CF and modified mCF materials with different PR additive.
Figure 7Comparison of thermal conductivity of pristine CF and mCF materials with different PR additive.