| Literature DB >> 31013722 |
Loan T T Nguyen1, Lan T H Nguyen2, Anh T T Duong3, Bui Duc Nguyen4, Nguyen Quang Hai5, Viet Ha Chu6, Trinh Duy Nguyen7,8, Long Giang Bach9,10.
Abstract
Lanthanum (La)-doped zinc oxide nanoparticles were synthesized with different La concentrations by employing a gel combustion method using poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA). The as-synthesized photocatalysts were characterized using various techniques, including X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX), photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy, and UV-visible absorption spectroscopy. The average size of ZnO nanoparticles decreased from 34.3 to 10.3 nm with increasing concentrations of La, and the band gap, as evaluated by linear fitting, decreased from 3.10 to 2.78 eV. Additionally, it was found that the photocatalytic activity of doped samples, as investigated by using methyl orange dye under visible lights, improved in response to the increase in La concentration. The decomposition of methyl orange reached 85.86% after 150 min in visible light using La0.1Zn0.9O as the photocatalyst.Entities:
Keywords: La-doped zinc oxide; gel combustion; nanoparticles; optical property; photocatalytic activity
Year: 2019 PMID: 31013722 PMCID: PMC6515255 DOI: 10.3390/ma12081195
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the LaxZn1−xO samples calcined at 500 °C.
Average crystallite size and lattice parameter values of ZnO and La-doped ZnO calcined at 500 °C.
| Sample | 2θ (degree) | d101 (Å) | FWHM (deg.) | Average Crystallite Size (nm) | Lattice Parameter (a) (Å) | Lattice Parameter (c) (Å) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pure ZnO | 36.268 | 2.474 | 0.244 | 34.3 | 3.2505 | 5.216 |
| La0.01Zn0.99O | 36.261 | 2.475 | 0.439 | 18.9 | 3.2490 | 5.208 |
| La0.05Zn0.95O | 36.320 | 2.474 | 0.695 | 12.1 | 3.2447 | 5.202 |
| La0.10Zn0.90O | 36.260 | 2.480 | 0.814 | 10.3 | 3.2447 | 5.214 |
Figure 2Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrum of La0.05Zn0.95O nanoparticles.
Figure 3Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the LaxZn1−xO samples: x = 0.0 (a); x = 0.01 (b), x = 0.05 (c), and x = 0.1 (d).
Figure 4The UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectra of LaxZn1−xO nanoparticles.
Wavelength and energy of the band gap of pure ZnO and La-doped ZnO nanoparticles.
| Samples | ZnO | La0.01Zn0.99O | La0.05Zn0.95O | La0.1Zn0.9O |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| λ (nm) | 400 | 425 | 440 | 445 |
| Eg (eV) | 3.10 | 2.91 | 2.82 | 2.78 |
Figure 5Photoluminescence (PL) spectrum of La0.01Zn0.99O nanoparticles.
Figure 6Photocatalytic efficiency of methyl orange (MO) versus time (min) under visible light irradiation on the LaxZn1−xO nanoparticles: ZnO (1); La0.01Zn0.99O (2); La0.05Zn0.95O (3); La0.10Zn0.90O (4).
Figure 7ln(Co/Ct) versus time (min) of MO degradation under visible light irradiation on the LaxZn1−xO nanoparticles.
Photocatalytic reaction parameter of pure ZnO and La-doped ZnO nanoparticles.
| Sample | Rate Constant (k), min−1 | R2 |
|---|---|---|
| Pure ZnO | 0.0032 | 0.9792 |
| La0.01Zn0.99O | 0.0039 | 0.9770 |
| La0.05Zn0.95O | 0.0096 | 0.9776 |
| La0.10Zn0.90O | 0.0130 | 0.9771 |