Antonia V Seligowski1,2, Lauren A M Lebois1,2, Sarah B Hill2, Isabella Kahhale3, Jonathan D Wolff2, Tanja Jovanovic4,5, Sherry R Winternitz1,2, Milissa L Kaufman1,2, Kerry J Ressler1,2. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 2. Division of Depression and Anxiety Disorders, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts. 3. Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 5. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) demonstrate alterations in autonomic responses to fear conditioning, such as exaggerated startle and poor fear inhibition. However, there is a paucity of research on fear conditioning among individuals with PTSD and dissociative symptoms, which represents 10-30% of those with PTSD. The current study used a fear-potentiated startle (FPS) conditioning paradigm to examine autonomic responses among women with PTSD and a range of dissociative symptoms. METHODS: Participants included 39 women with PTSD and dissociation, and 53 women with PTSD with unknown levels of dissociation. The FPS paradigm consisted of conditioned stimuli associated and not associated with an aversive unconditioned stimulus. FPS response (eyeblink startle), electrocardiogram (ECG), and skin conductance response (SCR) were collected during the FPS paradigm. RESULTS: Compared to the PTSD-unknown dissociation sample, the PTSD-dissociation sample demonstrated significantly lower FPS during the last block of conditioning. Among the PTSD-dissociation sample, higher dissociation scores were associated with decreased FPS and SCR, and higher respiratory sinus arrhythmia (derived from ECG). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that autonomic responses to fear conditioning differ depending on the presence and severity of dissociative symptoms. Given that treatment response may differ depending on dissociative symptoms, it is important to understand the mechanisms that underlie different subtypes of PTSD and that may affect treatment response and outcome.
BACKGROUND: Individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) demonstrate alterations in autonomic responses to fear conditioning, such as exaggerated startle and poor fear inhibition. However, there is a paucity of research on fear conditioning among individuals with PTSD and dissociative symptoms, which represents 10-30% of those with PTSD. The current study used a fear-potentiated startle (FPS) conditioning paradigm to examine autonomic responses among women with PTSD and a range of dissociative symptoms. METHODS:Participants included 39 women with PTSD and dissociation, and 53 women with PTSD with unknown levels of dissociation. The FPS paradigm consisted of conditioned stimuli associated and not associated with an aversive unconditioned stimulus. FPS response (eyeblink startle), electrocardiogram (ECG), and skin conductance response (SCR) were collected during the FPS paradigm. RESULTS: Compared to the PTSD-unknown dissociation sample, the PTSD-dissociation sample demonstrated significantly lower FPS during the last block of conditioning. Among the PTSD-dissociation sample, higher dissociation scores were associated with decreased FPS and SCR, and higher respiratory sinus arrhythmia (derived from ECG). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that autonomic responses to fear conditioning differ depending on the presence and severity of dissociative symptoms. Given that treatment response may differ depending on dissociative symptoms, it is important to understand the mechanisms that underlie different subtypes of PTSD and that may affect treatment response and outcome.
Authors: Charles F Gillespie; Bekh Bradley; Kristie Mercer; Alicia K Smith; Karen Conneely; Mark Gapen; Tamara Weiss; Ann C Schwartz; Joseph F Cubells; Kerry J Ressler Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2009-06-09 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Tanja Jovanovic; Seth D Norrholm; Jennifer E Fennell; Megan Keyes; Ana M Fiallos; Karyn M Myers; Michael Davis; Erica J Duncan Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2009-04-05 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Alyssa R Roeckner; Shivangi Sogani; Vasiliki Michopoulos; Rebecca Hinrichs; Sanne J H van Rooij; Barbara O Rothbaum; Tanja Jovanovic; Kerry J Ressler; Jennifer S Stevens Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2022-09-16 Impact factor: 8.294
Authors: Janine Thome; Maria Densmore; Braeden A Terpou; Jean Théberge; Margaret C McKinnon; Ruth A Lanius Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2022-05-30 Impact factor: 3.617
Authors: Janine Thome; Maria Densmore; Georgia Koppe; Braeden Terpou; Jean Théberge; Margaret C McKinnon; Ruth A Lanius Journal: Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks) Date: 2019-09-27
Authors: Abigail Powers; Yara Mekawi; Maximilian Fickenwirth; Nicole R Nugent; H Drew Dixon; Sean Minton; Ye Ji Kim; Rachel Gluck; Sierra Carter; Negar Fani; Ann C Schwartz; Bekh Bradley; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Thaddeus W W Pace; Tanja Jovanovic; Vasiliki Michopoulos; Charles F Gillespie Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Elizabeth R Steuber; Antonia V Seligowski; Alyssa R Roeckner; Mariam Reda; Lauren A M Lebois; Sanne J H van Rooij; Vishnu P Murty; Timothy D Ely; Steven E Bruce; Stacey L House; Francesca L Beaudoin; Xinming An; Donglin Zeng; Thomas C Neylan; Gari D Clifford; Sarah D Linnstaedt; Laura T Germine; Scott L Rauch; Christopher Lewandowski; Sophia Sheikh; Christopher W Jones; Brittany E Punches; Robert A Swor; Meghan E McGrath; Lauren A Hudak; Jose L Pascual; Anna M Chang; Claire Pearson; David A Peak; Robert M Domeier; Brian J O'Neil; Niels K Rathlev; Leon D Sanchez; Robert H Pietrzak; Jutta Joormann; Deanna M Barch; Diego A Pizzagalli; James M Elliott; Ronald C Kessler; Karestan C Koenen; Samuel A McLean; Kerry J Ressler; Tanja Jovanovic; Nathaniel G Harnett; Jennifer S Stevens Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 5.250