Literature DB >> 31012070

Inhibiting effects of flue gas desulfurization gypsum on soil phosphorus loss in Chongming Dongtan, southeastern China.

He Kun1, Li Xiaoping2.   

Abstract

To explore the possibility of using flue gas desulfurization gypsum (FGDG) for inhibiting phosphorus (P) loss due to agricultural runoff, a 3-year study was performed in the farmlands of Chongming Dongtan between 2012 and 2015. Five different quantities of FGDG were used to treat the soil, and the effects of different treatments on the characteristics of soil P and crop growth were investigated. The results showed that 2 years after application of FGDG, the soil density at a depth of 0-10 cm decreased by 4.35-7.97%, the porosity increased by 1.77-11.0%, and the topsoil permeability increased by 0.87-3.81 times. Although the use of FGDG did not change the total P concentration in the soil, it decreased the concentration of sodium bicarbonate extractable P in the soil. Compared to the control, the average extractable P concentration at depths of 0-10 cm, 10-20 cm, and 20-30 cm decreased by 22.0-46.1%, 26.9-40.5%, and 22.8-34.8%, respectively. The inorganic P in the soil increased as the amount of FGDG increased, and the increase was mainly as Ca-P in the forms Ca2-P and Ca10-P. The decrease in bicarbonate extractable P and increase in inorganic P in the soil did not affect the growth of the crops, and the biomass and output of the crops increased compared to the control. Therefore, FGDG can enhance soil P immobilization, thus reducing soluble P runoff from farm fields, and improving water quality in receiving lakes and rivers while maintaining P nutrition to the crops.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agricultural nonpoint source pollution; Flue gas desulfurization gypsum (FGDG); P fraction; P loss

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31012070     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05044-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  8 in total

1.  Sustainable Uses of FGD Gypsum in Agricultural Systems: Introduction.

Authors:  Dexter B Watts; Warren A Dick
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.751

2.  In-season effect of flue gas desulfurization gypsum on soil physical properties.

Authors:  Meghan E Buckley; Richard P Wolkowski
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.751

3.  Amendment effects on soil test phosphorus.

Authors:  D Brauer; G E Aiken; D H Pote; S J Livingston; L D Norton; T R Way; J H Edwards
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 2.751

4.  Impact of flue gas desulfurization gypsum application on water quality in a coastal plain soil.

Authors:  H Allen Torbert; Dexter B Watts
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.751

5.  Effects of flue gas desulfurization and mined gypsums on soil properties and on hay and corn growth in eastern ohio.

Authors:  David Kost; Liming Chen; Xialou Guo; Yongqiang Tian; Ken Ladwig; Warren A Dick
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.751

6.  Application of flue gas desulfurization gypsum and its impact on wheat grain and soil chemistry.

Authors:  T M DeSutter; L J Cihacek; S Rahman
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.751

7.  Remediation of saline-sodic soil with flue gas desulfurization gypsum in a reclaimed tidal flat of southeast China.

Authors:  Yumei Mao; Xiaping Li; Warren A Dick; Liming Chen
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 5.565

8.  Impact of gypsum applied to grass buffer strips on reducing soluble p in surface water runoff.

Authors:  D B Watts; H A Torbert
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 2.751

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.