Literature DB >> 31012043

Oncological Outcomes of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Involvement.

Ipek Sapci1, Conor P Delaney1, David Liska1, Sudha Amarnath2, Matthew F Kalady1, Scott R Steele1, Emre Gorgun3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The optimal management of patients with radiologically positive lateral pelvic lymph nodes in locally advanced rectal cancer remains unclear. We compared local recurrence rates and oncological outcomes of patients with locally advanced cancer with and without lateral pelvic lymph nodes.
METHODS: Patients who underwent curative surgery for stage III rectal adenocarcinoma between 2009 and 2014 and had a preoperative MRI at our institution as well as preoperative neoadjuvant treatment were included. Patients with positive lateral pelvic lymph nodes (iliac or obturator nodes) on preoperative MRI (LPND +) were compared to patients with no lateral pelvic nodal disease (LPND -). Data were collected from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Differences between the groups were compared in univariate analysis. Log-rank test was used to evaluate overall and disease-free survival between the groups.
RESULTS: A total of 125 patients met inclusion criteria with a mean age of 56.3 ± 12.2 and 75% were male. Median follow-up was 44 months (IQR 32, 106). Positive LPND was present on preoperative MRI in 43/125 (34.4%) patients who were in the LPND (+) group. Seventeen out of 43 patients had a post-neoadjuvant treatment MRI and 15 patients had a decrease in size of nodes or disappearance of LPND. On univariate analysis, LPND (+) and LPND (-) groups were comparable. Local recurrence rates were higher in the LPND (+) group, although this was not statistically significant (16.3% vs. 6%, p = 0.06). Overall and disease-free survival rates were comparable between the LPND (+) and LPND (-) groups (p = 0.97, p = 0.51).
CONCLUSIONS: Management of patients with advanced rectal cancer and radiologically positive lateral pelvic lymph nodes is challenging due to high local recurrence rates. Further studies are needed to develop care pathways for the optimal treatment processes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemoradiation; Lateral pelvic lymph node; Locally advanced rectal cancer; Lymph node dissection

Year:  2019        PMID: 31012043     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04224-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  18 in total

1.  Lateral lymph node metastasis is a major cause of locoregional recurrence in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and curative resection.

Authors:  Tae Hyun Kim; Seung-Yong Jeong; Dong Hyun Choi; Dae Yong Kim; Kyung Hae Jung; Sung Ho Moon; Hee Jin Chang; Seok-Byung Lim; Hyo Seong Choi; Jae-Gahb Park
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  The incidence of lateral pelvic side-wall nodal involvement in low rectal cancer may be similar in Japan and the West.

Authors:  H Yano; B J Moran
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Evaluation of lateral pelvic nodes in patients with advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Dae Jung Kim; Jae-Joon Chung; Jeong-Sik Yu; Eun Suk Cho; Joo Hee Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Indication and benefit of pelvic sidewall dissection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Kenichi Sugihara; Hirotoshi Kobayashi; Tomoyuki Kato; Takeo Mori; Hidetaka Mochizuki; Shingo Kameoka; Kazuo Shirouzu; Tetsuichiro Muto
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Relevance of magnetic resonance imaging-detected pelvic sidewall lymph node involvement in rectal cancer.

Authors:  O C Shihab; F Taylor; N Bees; H Blake; N Jeyadevan; R Bleehen; L Blomqvist; M Creagh; C George; A Guthrie; H Massouh; D Peppercorn; B J Moran; R J Heald; P Quirke; P Tekkis; G Brown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Male urinary and sexual functions after mesorectal excision alone or in combination with extended lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Takayuki Akasu; Kenichi Sugihara; Yoshihiro Moriya
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with advanced low rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy based on pretreatment imaging.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Masashi Ueno; Kiyoshi Matsueda; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Satoshi Nagayama; Yosuke Fukunaga; Toshiyuki Unno; Atsuhiro Kano; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Masatoshi Oya; Toshiharu Yamaguchi; Toshiaki Watanabe; Tetsuichiro Muto
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Morbidity and mortality of wide pelvic lymphadenectomy for rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  F Michelassi; G E Block
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Comparative outcome between chemoradiotherapy and lateral pelvic lymph node dissection following total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin C Kim; Keiichi Takahashi; Chang S Yu; Hee C Kim; Tae W Kim; Min H Ryu; Jong H Kim; Takeo Mori
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Extended lymphadenectomy and preoperative radiotherapy for lower rectal cancers.

Authors:  Toshiaki Watanabe; Giichiro Tsurita; Tetsuichiro Muto; Toshio Sawada; Koki Sunouchi; Yoshiki Higuchi; Yasuhiro Komuro; Takamitsu Kanazawa; Takeru Iijima; Michiko Miyaki; Hirokazu Nagawa
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  1 in total

1.  SEOM-GEMCAD-TTD clinical guidelines for localized rectal cancer (2021).

Authors:  Jaume Capdevila; Ma Auxiliadora Gómez; Mónica Guillot; David Páez; Carles Pericay; Maria José Safont; Noelia Tarazona; Ruth Vera; Joana Vidal; Javier Sastre
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.340

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.