Dominic R Parker1, Tim Bright2, Tanya Irvine2, Sarah K Thompson3, David I Watson2. 1. Discipline of Surgery Flinders University, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia. dominic.parker@sa.gov.au. 2. Discipline of Surgery Flinders University, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia. 3. Discipline of Surgery The University of Adelaide, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic approach is the preferred method for repair of large hiatus hernias but can be technically challenging. Training surgeons need experience as the primary operator to gain competency in this operation. However, learning the procedure should not compromise the functional long-term outcome for patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether any difference in long-term outcomes exists for patients having a laparoscopic large hiatus hernia repair performed by a trainee versus a consultant surgeon. METHODS: A total of 648 suitable patients who had undergone laparoscopic repair of a large hiatus hernia were identified from a prospective database. Cases were divided into two groups based on whether the primary operator was a trainee or a consultant surgeon. Demographics, perioperative data, revisions and patient-reported clinical outcomes via standardised questionnaires were compared. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic repair of a large hiatus hernia performed by a trainee versus a consultant surgeon, with comparable patient-reported outcomes for heartburn, dysphagia, and overall satisfaction with the outcome following surgery. Median operative time was approximately 20 min longer for trainees (p = <0.0001). Revisional surgery rates were similar for the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients operated on by trainees have equivalent long-term clinical outcomes to patients operated on by consultant surgeons. For these patients, surgery can be safely performed by supervised trainees.
BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic approach is the preferred method for repair of large hiatus hernias but can be technically challenging. Training surgeons need experience as the primary operator to gain competency in this operation. However, learning the procedure should not compromise the functional long-term outcome for patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether any difference in long-term outcomes exists for patients having a laparoscopic large hiatus hernia repair performed by a trainee versus a consultant surgeon. METHODS: A total of 648 suitable patients who had undergone laparoscopic repair of a large hiatus hernia were identified from a prospective database. Cases were divided into two groups based on whether the primary operator was a trainee or a consultant surgeon. Demographics, perioperative data, revisions and patient-reported clinical outcomes via standardised questionnaires were compared. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic repair of a large hiatus hernia performed by a trainee versus a consultant surgeon, with comparable patient-reported outcomes for heartburn, dysphagia, and overall satisfaction with the outcome following surgery. Median operative time was approximately 20 min longer for trainees (p = <0.0001). Revisional surgery rates were similar for the two groups. CONCLUSIONS:Patients operated on by trainees have equivalent long-term clinical outcomes to patients operated on by consultant surgeons. For these patients, surgery can be safely performed by supervised trainees.
Entities:
Keywords:
Laparoscopic repair; Large hiatus hernia; Long-term outcomes; Surgical training
Authors: Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Raymond Richard Price; Steven R DeMeester; Jörg Zehetner; Oliver J Muensterer; Ziad Awad; Sumeet K Mittal; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Robert D Fanelli Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Claire N Brown; Lorelle T Smith; David I Watson; Peter G Devitt; Sarah K Thompson; Glyn G Jamieson Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Joris A Broeders; David J Roks; Usama Ahmed Ali; David I Watson; Robert J Baigrie; Zhanguo Cao; Jens Hartmann; Guy J Maddern Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: James D Luketich; Katie S Nason; Neil A Christie; Arjun Pennathur; Blair A Jobe; Rodney J Landreneau; Matthew J Schuchert Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2009-12-11 Impact factor: 5.209