Literature DB >> 31011995

Radiation exposure related to cardiovascular CT examination: comparison between conventional 64-MDCT and third-generation dual-source MDCT.

Giacomo Agliata1, Nicolò Schicchi1, Andrea Agostini1, Marco Fogante2, Alberto Mari3, Stefania Maggi3, Andrea Giovagnoni1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare radiation exposure associated with daily practice cardiovascular (CV) examinations performed on two different multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scanners, a conventional 64-MDCT and a third-generation dual-source (DS) MDCT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 1458 patients who underwent CV examinations between January 2017 and August 2018 were enrolled. A single-source 64-MDCT (Lightspeed VCT, GE) scan was performed in 705 patients from January to August 2017 (207 coronary examinations and 498 vascular examinations) and 753 patients underwent third-generation 192 × 2-DSCT (Somatom FORCE, Siemens) scan from January to August 2018 (302 coronary examinations and 451 vascular examinations). Volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP), effective dose (ED), tube voltage (TV) and exposure time (ET), pitch factor (PF) were registered for each patient. Student's t test was used to compare mean values between each corresponding group of MDCT and DSCT.
RESULTS: In coronary examinations with DSCT, CTDIvol was 24.4% lower (23.1 mGy vs 30.6 mGy, p < 0.0001) and DLP and ED reductions were 35.6% than with MDCT (465.0 mGy * cm vs 732.3 mGy * cm and 6.5 mSv and 10.3 mSv; vs p < 0.0001). Concerning scan parameters, kVp and ET reductions were 12.7% and 69.4%, respectively (p < 0.0001); PF increase was 73.8% (p < 0.0001). In all vascular studies, DSCT, compared with MDCT, permitted to reduce CTDIvol from 43.5 to 70.6%; DLP and ED reductions were from 50.3 to 73.1%; kVp and ET decreases were from 10.7 to 32.5% and from 26.3 to 68.7%. PF increase was from 16.7 to 58.1% (all differences with p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: In daily practice, CV examinations CTDI, DLP, ED, ET and TV were lower and PF was higher with 192 × 2-DSCT compared to 64-MDCT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  192 × 2 dual-source computed tomography; 64 single-source computed tomography; Cardiovascular examinations; Radiation dose comparison

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31011995     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-019-01036-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  12 in total

1.  Editorial from guest editors current Euratom legislation (DE 59/2013): new patient management in radiation protection.

Authors:  Giuseppe Guglielmi; Antonio Pinto; Sergio Salerno
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  In vivo radiation dosimetry and image quality of turbo-flash and retrospective dual-source CT coronary angiography.

Authors:  Nicolò Schicchi; Alberto Mari; Marco Fogante; Paolo Esposto Pirani; Giacomo Agliata; Niccolò Tosi; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Ester Cannizzaro; Federico Bruno; Alessandra Splendiani; Ernesto Di Cesare; Stefania Maggi; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging: state of the art and applications in whole-body imaging.

Authors:  Domenico Albano; Federico Bruno; Andrea Agostini; Salvatore Alessio Angileri; Massimo Benenati; Giulia Bicchierai; Michaela Cellina; Vito Chianca; Diletta Cozzi; Ginevra Danti; Federica De Muzio; Letizia Di Meglio; Francesco Gentili; Giuliana Giacobbe; Giulia Grazzini; Irene Grazzini; Pasquale Guerriero; Carmelo Messina; Giuseppe Micci; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Maria Paola Rocco; Roberto Grassi; Vittorio Miele; Antonio Barile
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Imaging guided percutaneous renal biopsy: do it or not?

Authors:  Francesco Pagnini; Eleonora Cervi; Umberto Maestroni; Andrea Agostini; Alessandra Borgheresi; Filippo Piacentino; Salvatore Alessio Angileri; Anna Maria Ierardi; Chiara Floridi; Mattia Carbone; Francesco Ziglioli; Massimo De Filippo
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-07-13

5.  FORCE dual-energy CT in pathological grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Chunling Zhang; Ning Wang; Xinyou Su; Kun Li; Dexin Yu; Aimei Ouyang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Diagnostic and interventional radiology: an update.

Authors:  Andrea Giovagnoni; Massimo De Filippo; Antonio Barile
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-07-13

Review 7.  Anterior chest wall non-traumatic diseases: a road map for the radiologist.

Authors:  Susanna Guerrini; Giulio Bagnacci; Antonio Barile; Ernesto La Paglia; Francesco Gentili; Luca Luzzi; Nicola Giordano; Antonella Fioravanti; Francesca Bellisai; Luca Cantarini; Luca Volterrani; Bruno Frediani; Maria Antonietta Mazzei
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-07-13

Review 8.  Extranodal Lymphomas: a pictorial review for CT and MRI classification.

Authors:  Alfonso Reginelli; Fabrizio Urraro; Angelo Sangiovanni; Gaetano Maria Russo; Carolina Russo; Roberta Grassi; Andrea Agostini; Maria Paola Belfiore; Michaela Cellina; Chiara Floridi; Andrea Giovagnoni; Antonello Sica; Salvatore Cappabianca
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-07-13

Review 9.  Hepatic tumors: pitfall in diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  Giulia Grazzini; Diletta Cozzi; Federica Flammia; Roberta Grassi; Andrea Agostini; Maria Paola Belfiore; Alessandra Borgheresi; Maria Antonietta Mazzei; Chiara Floridi; Gianpaolo Carrafiello; Andrea Giovagnoni; Silvia Pradella; Vittorio Miele
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-07-13

Review 10.  Clinical utility of Dual Energy Computed Tomography in gout: current concepts and applications.

Authors:  Marina Carotti; Fausto Salaffi; Emilio Filippucci; Giacomo Aringhieri; Federico Bruno; Sabrina Giovine; Francesco Gentili; Chiara Floridi; Alessandra Borgheresi; Massimo De Filippo; Carlo Masciocchi; Antonio Barile; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.