Jessica J Wyse1,2, Linda Ganzini3,4, Steven K Dobscha3,4, Erin E Krebs5,6, Benjamin J Morasco3,4. 1. Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. wyse@ohsu.edu. 2. School of Public Health, Portland State University-Oregon Health & Science University, 840 SW Gaines Street, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. wyse@ohsu.edu. 3. Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. 5. Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 6. Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence has continued to accumulate regarding the potential risks of treating chronic pain with long-term opioid therapy (LTOT). Clinical practice guidelines now encourage clinicians to implement practices designed to reduce opioid-related risks. Yet how clinicians implement these guidelines within the context of the patient encounter has received little attention. OBJECTIVE: This secondary analysis aimed to identify and describe clinicians' strategies for managing prescription opioid misuse and aberrant behaviors among patients prescribed LTOT for chronic pain. DESIGN: Individual interviews guided by a semi-structured interview protocol probed: (1) methods clinicians utilize to reduce prescription opioid misuse and address aberrant opioid-related behaviors; (2) how clinicians respond to misuse; and (3) resources and constraints faced in managing and treating misuse among their patients. PARTICIPANTS: Interviews were conducted with 24 physicians and nurse practitioners, representing 22 Veterans Health Administration (VA) facilities across the USA, who had one or more patients in their clinical panels who were prescribed LTOT for the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain. APPROACH: Qualitative content analysis was the analytic approach utilized. A codebook was developed iteratively following group coding and discussion. All transcripts were coded with the finalized codebook. Quotes pertaining to key themes were retrieved and, following careful review, sorted into themes, which were then further categorized into sub-themes. Quotes that exemplified key sub-themes were selected for inclusion. KEY RESULTS: We detail the challenges clinicians describe in navigating conversations with patients around prescription opioid misuse, which include patient objection as well as clinician ambivalence. We identify verbal heuristics as one strategy clinicians utilize to structure these difficult conversations, and describe four heuristics: setting expectations, following orders, safety, and standardization. CONCLUSION: Clinicians frequently use verbal heuristics to routinize and increase the efficiency of care management discussions related to opioid prescribing, redirect responsibility, and defuse the potential emotional charge of the encounter.
BACKGROUND: Evidence has continued to accumulate regarding the potential risks of treating chronic pain with long-term opioid therapy (LTOT). Clinical practice guidelines now encourage clinicians to implement practices designed to reduce opioid-related risks. Yet how clinicians implement these guidelines within the context of the patient encounter has received little attention. OBJECTIVE: This secondary analysis aimed to identify and describe clinicians' strategies for managing prescription opioid misuse and aberrant behaviors among patients prescribed LTOT for chronic pain. DESIGN: Individual interviews guided by a semi-structured interview protocol probed: (1) methods clinicians utilize to reduce prescription opioid misuse and address aberrant opioid-related behaviors; (2) how clinicians respond to misuse; and (3) resources and constraints faced in managing and treating misuse among their patients. PARTICIPANTS: Interviews were conducted with 24 physicians and nurse practitioners, representing 22 Veterans Health Administration (VA) facilities across the USA, who had one or more patients in their clinical panels who were prescribed LTOT for the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain. APPROACH: Qualitative content analysis was the analytic approach utilized. A codebook was developed iteratively following group coding and discussion. All transcripts were coded with the finalized codebook. Quotes pertaining to key themes were retrieved and, following careful review, sorted into themes, which were then further categorized into sub-themes. Quotes that exemplified key sub-themes were selected for inclusion. KEY RESULTS: We detail the challenges clinicians describe in navigating conversations with patients around prescription opioid misuse, which include patient objection as well as clinician ambivalence. We identify verbal heuristics as one strategy clinicians utilize to structure these difficult conversations, and describe four heuristics: setting expectations, following orders, safety, and standardization. CONCLUSION: Clinicians frequently use verbal heuristics to routinize and increase the efficiency of care management discussions related to opioid prescribing, redirect responsibility, and defuse the potential emotional charge of the encounter.
Authors: Marianne S Matthias; Amy L Parpart; Kathryn A Nyland; Monica A Huffman; Dawana L Stubbs; Christy Sargent; Matthew J Bair Journal: Pain Med Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Steven K Dobscha; Kathryn Corson; Jennifer A Flores; Erin C Tansill; Martha S Gerrity Journal: Pain Med Date: 2008 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Michelle S Keller; Alma Jusufagic; Teryl K Nuckols; Jack Needleman; MarySue V Heilemann Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2021-05-22 Impact factor: 2.164