| Literature DB >> 31010990 |
Yan Mei Jin1, Xiao Qing Zhang2, Warwick B Badgery3, Peng Li2, Jun Xi Wu4.
Abstract
Objective: Sixty Pengbo semi-wool sheep ewes (approximately 1.5-years-old; 31.33 ± 0.43 kg) were randomly assigned to two groups, either G (grazing) or D (dry lot feeding), to examine the effects of traditional daily grazing and dry lot feeding on performance and blood metabolites during the cold season in Tibetan Plateau.Entities:
Keywords: Cold Stress; Serum Metabolites; Sheep; Tibet; Winter Housing
Year: 2019 PMID: 31010990 PMCID: PMC6718902 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.18.0966
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Chemical composition values of individual feeds on dry matter basis
| Feed | Chemical composition | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| DM (g/kg) | CP (g/kg) | ME (MJ/kg) | NDF (g/kg) | ADF (g/kg) | |
| Concentrate | 921.7 | 161.2 | 11.2 | 96.8 | 60.1 |
| 935.4 | 71.9 | 7.25 | 696.1 | 392.0 | |
DM, dry matter; CP, crude protein; ME, metabolisable energy; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber.
Concentrate consisted of chopped maize 65%, soybean meal 10%, cottonseed meal 8%, rapeseed meal 6%, wheat bran 10% and premix 1%.
Figure 1Changes in air temperatures in field, grazing sheepfold (G) and indoor feeding sheepfold (D) in each month from December to April. The data used were monthly mean values of the three conditions. Significant differences (p<0.05) are represented by different letters. Error bars are a standard error.
Changes in liveweight of ewes grazed outside (G) and fed indoors (D)
| Item | Treatment | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| G | D | ||
| Starting weight (kg) | 31.2±0.5 | 31.5±0.3 | 0.858 |
| Final weight (kg) | 28.8±1.2 | 32.4±0.9 | 0.020 |
| Weight gain (g/d) | −22.8±7.8 | 5.59±7.36 | 0.011 |
Means within each row differ significantly (p<0.05).
Physiological and biochemical parameter in blood of ewes grazed outside (G) and fed indoors (D)
| Item | Treatment | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| G | D | ||
| Physiological parameters | |||
| White blood cell (×109/L) | 138.5±7.2 | 159.3±5.4 | 0.037 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 128.2±10.9 | 135.5±4.3 | 0.441 |
| Red blood cell (×1012/L) | 8.35±0.72 | 8.40±0.33 | 0.882 |
| Platelet (×109/L) | 192.8±72.4 | 379.0±53.2 | 0.023 |
| Mean platelet volume (fL) | 6.07±0.49 | 5.70±0.50 | 0.229 |
| Platelet distribution width (%) | 14.7±0.2 | 14.6±0.1 | 0.893 |
| Plateletcrit (%) | 0.13±0.03 | 0.17±0.02 | 0.211 |
| Platelet-large cell ratio (%) | 13.1±3.5 | 7.8±1.7 | 0.028 |
| Biochemical parameters | |||
| Total protein (g/L) | 72.6±5.7 | 70.4±4.4 | 0.472 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 25.3±1.2 | 24.4±1.4 | 0.187 |
| Globulin (g/L) | 49.2±4.1 | 48.0±5.5 | 0.693 |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 3.25±0.37 | 3.02±0.52 | 0.418 |
| Urea (mmol/L) | 8.74±1.13 | 7.52±1.23 | 0.105 |
| Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.66±0.26 | 1.36±0.18 | 0.039 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 0.31±0.13 | 0.29±0.16 | 0.731 |
| High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (g/mL) | 1.40±0.05 | 1.29±0.06 | 0.008 |
| Low density lipoprotein cholesterol (g/mL) | 0.40±0.10 | 0.34±0.08 | 0.381 |
Means within each row differ significantly (p<0.05).
Serum antioxidant capacity of ewes grazed outside (G) and fed indoors (D)
| Item | Treatment | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| G | D | ||
| Total antioxidant capacity (nmol/mg prot) | 3.72±0.20 | 3.54±0.15 | 0.485 |
| Superoxide dismutase (U/mg prot) | 117.9±4.2 | 110.2±3.7 | 0.202 |
| Glutathione peroxidase (nmol/mg prot) | 123.4±8.9 | 97.8±5.2 | 0.041 |
| Malondialdehyde (nmol/mg prot) | 4.26±0.30 | 3.85±0.20 | 0.138 |
Means within each row differ significantly (p<0.05).
Figure 2Multivariate data analyses of the LC/MS serum spectra data. 3D plot of principal component analysis of the G group compared with the D group in positive mode (A); and negative mode (B); partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) S-plot for in positive mode (C); and negative mode (D). Gray plot represents G group, the grazing group. Black plot represents D group, the drylot feeding group. A separation between G and D groups is observable for the investigated analytical conditions.
Figure 3The heat map depicted here with black band indicates an increase in metabolite level of the grazing group (G) (fold change <1.2) and the gray band indicates a decrease in metabolite level of the drylot feeding group (D) (fold change >1.2). Each row represents a metabolite and each column represents a sheep sample. Different colors represent different intensities, from gray to black, represents low to high of metabolite intensities.
Identification and trends of change for differential metabolites
| Metabolite | Formula | p-value | VIP | Retained time | m/z | Trend | Metabolic pathway |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abscisic acid | C15H20O4 | 0.004 | 6.99 | 4.55 | 247 | ↑ | Metabolic pathways |
| Xanthoxin | C15H22O3 | 0.008 | 5.96 | 5.37 | 233 | ↑ | Metabolic pathways |
| 3-Polyprenyl-4,5-dihydroxybenzoate | C12H14O4·[C5H8]n | 0.044 | 5.11 | 5.37 | 291 | ↑ | Ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis |
VIP, variable important for the projection.
Means within each row differ significantly (p<0.05).