Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of corn stover during field exposure and their fermentation characteristics of silage prepared with microbial additives.

OBJECTIVE: To effectively use corn stover resources as animal feed, we explored the chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of corn stover during field exposure and the fermentation characteristics of silage prepared with lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and cellulase.
METHODS: Corn ears including the cobs and shucks were harvested at the ripe stage. The corn stover was exposed in the field under natural weather conditions. Silages were prepared after 0, 2, 4, 7, 15, 30, and 60 d of exposure. Corn stover was chopped into approximately 1-2 cm lengths and then packed into 5 liter plastic silos. The ensiling density was 550.1±20.0 g/L of fresh matter, and the silos were kept at room temperature (10-25°C). Silage treatments were designed as follows: without additives (control), with LAB, with cellulase, and with LAB+cellulase. After 45 d of fermentation, the silos were opened for chemical composition, fermentation quality and in vitro digestion analyses.
RESULTS: After harvest, corn stover contained 78.19% moisture, 9.01% crude protein (CP) and 64.54% neutral detergent fiber (NDF) on a dry matter (DM) basis. During field exposure, the DM, NDF, and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents of corn stover increased, whereas the CP and water-soluble carbohydrate contents and in vitro digestibility of the DM and CP decreased (p<0.05). Compared to the control silage, cellulase-treated silage had lower (p<0.05) NDF and ADF contents. The pH values were lower in silage treated with LAB, cellulase, or LAB+cellulase, and lactic acid contents were higher (p<0.05) than those of the control. Silage treated with cellulase or LAB+cellulase improved (p<0.05) the in vitro DM digestibility (IVDMD) compared to that of the control or LAB-treated silage.
CONCLUSION: Corn stover silage should be prepared using fresh materials since stover nutrients are lost during field exposure, and LAB and cellulase can improve silage fermentation and IVDMD.

INTRODUCTION

Crop byproducts from agriculture are an important animal feed resource worldwide. In China, approximately 900 million tons of crop straw are produced annually, of which 30% is corn stover. After harvest, corn stover generally remains fresh and contains nutrients suitable for animal feed. Currently, at least 30% of corn stover is used for animal production or papermaking, whereas the remainder is usually incinerated in the field or plowed back into the soil after pulverization [1]. In recent years, the continuous degeneration of native grasslands has created a structural shortage of feed resources for herbivorous animal husbandry. Therefore, the effective use of corn stover resources to preserve fermented feed has become an urgent research topic globally, particularly in China.

Ensilage is an effective method for processing and utilizing forage. Corn stover silage is currently widely used as ruminant feed in animal husbandry. However, following corn grain harvest, when exposure time is prolonged, corn stover moisture and nutrients decrease and lignification increases, resulting in decreased digestibility for animals [2]. Therefore, selecting the proper time for ensilage following corn harvest is an important condition for obtaining high-quality corn stover silage.

Microbial additives such as lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and cellulase are widely used in silage preparation [3]. LAB plays an important role in aiding fermentation and preventing spoilage. Cellulase acts as a biocatalytic agent in the decomposition of cellulose; as a water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC), the cellulose decomposition product can be used by LAB to promote fermentation [4]. Many studies have demonstrated that using LAB or cellulase additives improves fermentation quality and nutritive value [5].

Despite previous studies focusing on forage, grass, and whole-crop corn silage [5,6], very little information is available on fermentation of corn stover silage at different exposure stages. As a part of the research related to effective utilization of corn stover, our previous study using different cultivars of corn confirmed that with increasing field exposure of corn stover, the nutrient and in vitro digestibility decreased [7]. Whether microbe additives can improve silage fermentation and nutrition value of corn stover silage requires future study. In this study, we prepared corn stover silage during field exposure using LAB and cellulase and evaluated the characteristics of the resulting fermentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Material and ensilage

The corn (Zea mays L.) that is widely cultivated in northeastern China was selected for use in this experiment. The cultivation experiment was carried out in an experimental field (125.4°E, 43.9°N, Changchun, China). Seeds were sown on May 5, 2016, and weeds were removed by application of herbicide on May 25, 2016.

Corn ears including cobs and shucks were harvested at the ripe stage on September 26, 2016. The corn stover was exposed in the field under natural weather conditions. During the experiment, the average temperature was 3°C, and the average air humidity was 71.3%. Silages were prepared after 0, 2, 4, 7, 15, 30, and 60 d of exposure. The corn stover with 0, 2, 4, and 7 d of exposure was prepared directly, and the corn stover exposed for 15, 30, and 60 d was adjusted to 60% moisture for producing silage. The weighed LAB, cellulose, and LAB+cellulase were dissolved in 20 mL of distilled water, uniformly sprayed on corn stover in a pot and mixed well.

Silage treatments were designed as follows: without additives (control); with LAB inoculant Chikusou-1 (LAB, Lactobacillus plantarum, Snow Brand Seed Co., Ltd, Sapporo, Japan); with Acremonium cellulase enzyme (cellulase, Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Lte, Tokyo, Japan); or with LAB+cellulase. The LAB was inoculated at 1.0×105 colony-forming units/g of fresh matter (FM), and cellulase was applied at 50 mg/kg of FM.

Corn stover was chopped into approximately 1 to 2 cm lengths before ensiling and then packed into 5 liters plastic silos. The ensiling density was 550.1±20.0 g/L of FM, and the silos were kept at room temperature (10°C to 25°C). After 45 d of fermentation, three replicate silos were opened for chemical composition, fermentation quality and in vitro digestion analyses.

Chemical analysis

Dry matter (DM) of fresh samples and silage were determined by oven drying at 65°C for 48 h. Then, these oven-dried samples were milled through a 1.0 mm screen for chemical analyses. Organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), and ether extract (EE) were analyzed according to the methods of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists [8]. Neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL) were determined according to Van Soest et al [9]. WSC was determined using the sulfuric acid-anthrone method [10]. Buffering capacity (BC) was measured by the method of Playne and McDonald [11]. Gross energy (GE) was determined by oxygen bomb calorimeter [8]. Digestive energy (DE), metabolizable energy (ME), net energy for maintenance (NEm), net energy for lactating cows (NEl), and net energy for gain (NEg) were calculated using the following formulas.

This formula was based on 347 experimental data from France and other countries, some of which came from castrated rams fed separately from hay and a mixture of hay and concentrate and some from studies that fed 50,070 dairy cows different ratios of fine and coarse mixed diets. The crude fiber (CF) content in the feed varied from 130 to 410 g/kg (mean 243 g/kg), and the total protein content was 86 to 330 g/kg (mean 166 g/kg). This formula has been accurately verified by the results of trials with castrated rams fed 17 different diets. The following formulas were also derived from the above formula [12].

Herein, except for CF (g/kg), CP, EE, NDF, ADF, and Ash are expressed as a percentage of DM (% DM); the unit of DE, ME, NEm, NEl, and NEg is kJ/g of DM.

Fermentation analysis

Twenty grams of each silage sample were homogenized in a blender with 180 mL of distilled water for 1 min and then filtered through four layers of cheesecloth as described by Owens et al [13]. The filtrate was used to measure pH (PHSJ-4F; INESA Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China), ammonia nitrogen (ammonia-N) and organic acid contents. The ammonia-N concentration was determined by Robinson [14]. The organic acid contents, including lactic acid (LA), acetic acid (AA), propionic acid (PA), and butyric acid (BA), were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (column: Shodex RS Pak KC-811; Showa Denko K. K., Kawasaki, Japan; detector: DAD, 210 nm, SPD-20A; Shimadzu Co., Ltd, Kyoto Japan; eluent: 3 mmol/L HCLO4, 1.0 mL/min; temperature: 50°C).

In vitro digestibility

The in vitro DM digestibility (IVDMD) was measured (0.5 g DM per sample) by a two-step approach [15] using ruminal liquor from sheep fed alfalfa hay and whole-plant corn silage once a day. Rumen fluid was collected through the rumen cannulas 2 h after feeding and diverted to plastic bottles. The fluid was filtered through 4 layers of cheesecloth and combined on an equal volume basis. The combined filtrate was mixed with CO2-bubbled McDougall’s artificial saliva at a ratio of 1:4 (vol/vol), and the pH of the artificial saliva was 6.8. Then, 50 mL of buffered rumen fluid was transferred to 128 mL serum bottles containing 0.5 g of sample and flushed with O2-free CO2. Tubes were capped with a butyl rubber stopper and sealed with an aluminum cap. Incubations were performed at 39°C for 6 h in a water bath with a reciprocal shaker (100 strokes/min). Then, after this procedure, measuring the concentrations of OM, CP, and GE [8] in the indigestible residue left in the test tubes allowed the estimation of the in vitro OM digestibility (IVOMD), in vitro CP digestibility (IVCPD), and in vitro GE digestibility (IVGED) [16].

Animal care

Animal experiments were approved by the Committee of Animal Experimentation and were performed under the institutional guidelines for animal experiments of the College of Animal Science, Jilin University, China. The experiments were performed according to recommendations proposed by the European Commission to minimize the suffering of animals.

Statistical analysis

All data from this experiment were subjected to analysis with SAS ver. 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). For the chemical compositions, BC, energy, and in vitro digestibility of corn stover, the significance differences among means were first analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Duncan’s test for significance between means. Linear, quadratic, cubic, logarithmic, monomial, and exponential regression models were fitted to describe the relationship between days of exposure and measurements. All the regression models for all measurements were shown to be extremely significant (p<0.005), so the p value was not presented for each model in Table 1, 2. Data on the chemical composition, energy, fermentation quality, and in vitro digestibility of silage were analyzed using 3-factor ANOVA, with exposure d (D), additive LAB (A), and additive cellulase (B) as fixed factors. The main effect of each factor and the interactions between factors were analyzed. While the interaction between A and B was significant, levels of A and B were combined to a new factor (A+B) with 4 levels: no additives, LAB added, cellulase added, and both LAB+cellulase added. Then, the two-way ANOVA was used to test the main effects and interactions of exposure d (D) and AB. The contrasts between the main effects of marginal means were made with the least significant difference method.

Table 1

Chemical composition and buffering capacity of corn stover during field exposure

Exposure d	DM (%)	OM	CP	NDF	ADF	ADL	WSC	BC (mE/kg of DM)
		----------------------------------------------------- % of DM -------------------------------------------------------
0	21.91g	90.38d	9.01a	64.54f	35.92f	4.93d	8.42a	266.62a
2	29.73f	91.37c	7.02b	66.48e	40.13e	6.21c	7.33b	197.05c
4	31.12e	93.60b	7.25b	70.73d	42.86d	6.96bc	6.02c	228.47b
7	35.72d	94.99a	5.99c	70.73d	42.86d	6.05cd	4.73d	203.58c
15	47.13c	94.81a	5.67d	77.92c	48.75c	8.14ab	4.16e	167.36d
30	71.35b	95.39a	5.01e	80.18b	51.39b	8.04ab	3.41f	173.02d
60	88.20a	95.12a	5.03e	82.10a	53.32a	8.98a	3.41f	128.61e
SEM	0.14	0.31	0.08	0.54	0.39	0.38	0.02	4.19
Coefficient of determination (R2) of regression equation (p<0.005)
Linear	0.9319	0.3652	0.5168	0.7342	0.7395	0.6890	0.5453	0.6922
Quadratic	0.9767	0.6857	0.7934	0.9498	0.9423	0.8181	0.8462	0.7574
Cubic	0.9869	0.8693	0.8911	0.9898	0.9856	0.9000	0.9557	0.8650
Logarithmic	0.7911	0.7792	0.8996	0.9544	0.9830	0.8992	0.9199	0.8628
Monomial	0.7199	0.7782	0.9266	0.9561	0.9826	0.8904	0.9417	0.8581
Exponential	0.9904	0.3631	0.5798	0.7136	0.6982	0.6237	0.6272	0.7833

Data are means of the three silage samples.

DM, dry matter; OM, organic matter; CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; ADL, acid detergent lignin; WSC, water soluble carbohydrate; BC, buffering capacity; SEM, standard error of mean.

Means within columns with different superscript letters differ significantly from each other (p<0.05).

Table 2

Energy and in vitro digestibility of corn stover during field exposure

Exposure d	Energy (MJ/kg of DM)						In vitro digestibility (% of DM)
	GE	DE	ME	NEm	NEl	NEg	IVDMD	IVOMD	IVCPD	IVGED
0	18.97e	11.92a	9.66a	6.76a	5.66a	3.90a	52.16a	56.69a	50.52a	55.07a
2	19.19cd	10.99b	8.91b	6.12b	5.12b	3.28b	49.74b	54.12b	47.72b	52.99b
4	19.07de	10.20c	8.25c	5.59c	4.68c	2.83c	47.83c	52.16c	47.27c	52.25c
7	19.29c	10.38c	8.44c	5.73c	4.79c	2.93c	48.39c	52.69c	46.15d	52.03c
15	19.82b	9.17d	7.43d	4.91d	4.11d	2.22d	45.49d	49.15d	44.43e	49.05d
30	20.02a	8.59e	6.95e	4.54e	3.80e	1.93e	44.21e	47.71e	43.21f	44.99e
60	19.86b	7.98f	6.46f	4.18f	3.50f	1.68f	42.78f	46.28f	42.76g	46.62f
SEM	0.04	0.09	0.08	0.06	0.05	0.05	0.23	0.26	0.11	0.23
Coefficient of determination (R2) of regression equation (p<0.005)
Linear	0.5850	0.7586	0.7582	0.7409	0.7409	0.7020	0.7414	0.7442	0.6560	0.7471
Quadratic	0.9516	0.9257	0.9249	0.9194	0.9194	0.9067	0.9112	0.9260	0.8996	0.9088
Cubic	0.9580	0.9742	0.9720	0.9711	0.9711	0.9688	0.9668	0.9744	0.9674	0.9600
Logarithmic	0.8310	0.9850	0.9824	0.9828	0.9828	0.9805	0.9829	0.9808	0.9789	0.9711
Monomial	0.8326	0.9810	0.9784	0.9798	0.9798	0.9788	0.9830	0.9798	0.9825	0.9707
Exponential	0.5848	0.8034	0.8029	0.7945	0.7945	0.7947	0.7648	0.7663	0.6752	0.7660

Data are means of the three silage samples.

DM, dry matter; GE, gross energy; DE, digestible energy; ME, metabolizable energy; NEm, net energy for maintenance; NEl, net energy for lactating cow; NEg, net energy for gain; IVDMD, in vitro dry matter digestibility; IVOMD, in vitro organic matter digestibility; IVCPD, in vitro crude protein digestibility; IVGED, in vitro gross energy digestibility; SEM, standard error of mean.

Means within columns with different superscript letters differ significantly from each other (p<0.05).

RESULTS

The chemical composition, BC, energy, and in vitro digestibility of corn stover, and the coefficient of determination for each regression equation (R2) during field exposure are shown in Table 1, 2. The DM, CP, NDF, and WSC values of fresh corn stover at 0 d of exposure were 21.91%, 9.01%, 64.54%, and 8.42% of DM, respectively. As the field exposure time increased, the DM, OM, NDF, ADF, and ADL contents significantly (p<0.05) increased in corn stover; however, the CP, WSC, DE, ME, NEm, NEl, NEg, and BC levels significantly (p<0.05) decreased. At 60 d of exposure, the CP, WSC, and DE decreased to 5.03, 3.41, and 7.98 MJ/kg of DM, respectively. As the field exposure time increased, the IVDMD, IVOMD, IVCPD, and IVGED of corn stover decreased significantly (p<0.05).

The chemical composition and energy of corn stover silage prepared with LAB and cellulase are shown in Table 3, 4. As the field exposure time increased, the CP content and GE, DE, ME, NEm, NEl, and NEg levels significantly (p<0.05) decreased, while NDF, ADF, and ADL contents significantly (p< 0.05) increased. Exposure d (D) influenced all chemical composition and energy measurements (p = 0.000), and LAB treatment of silage influenced the OM (p = 0.025). Cellulase treatment of silage influenced the NDF, ADF, DE, ME, NEm, NEl, and NEg (p = 0.002–0.008). D×LAB influenced the DM, OM, and CP (p = 0.000–0.002). D×cellulase influenced DM and GE (p = 0.000 and 0.001). LAB×cellulase influenced DM and GE (p = 0.005 and 0.002). D×LAB×cellulase influenced DM, OM, and CP (p = 0.000–0.009).

Table 3

Chemical compositions of corn stover silage prepared with lactic acid bacteria and cellulase

Items	DM %	OM	CP	NDF	ADF	ADL
		-------------------------------------------------- % of DM ---------------------------------------------------
Exposure d means
0	21.31a	90.35a	7.66e	67.62a	40.49a	6.02a
2	21.28a	90.24a	7.09d	70.50b	43.55b	6.75b
4	27.01b	91.57b	7.15d	72.47c	45.44c	7.41c
7	27.74c	92.83c	6.41c	74.19d	46.05c	7.21bc
15	34.81e	93.35d	6.05b	76.17e	47.32d	7.67c
30	34.41d	94.53f	5.31a	77.54f	50.17e	8.98d
60	36.28f	94.22e	5.49a	77.88f	50.12e	9.28d
SEM	0.14	0.06	0.12	0.46	0.40	0.17
Additives means
Control	29.01ab	92.53b	6.35a	74.39b	46.72b	7.74
LAB	28.81a	92.44ab	6.23a	74.16ab	46.43b	7.54
Cellulase	28.83a	92.46ab	6.41ab	73.14a	45.45a	7.47
LAB+cellulase	29.25b	92.33a	6.63b	73.39ab	46.04ab	7.72
SEM	0.11	0.05	0.09	0.35	0.30	0.13
Significance of main effects and interactions
Exposure d (D)	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
LAB	0.316	0.025	0.530	0.987	0.610	0.824
Cellulase	0.249	0.065	0.012	0.006	0.008	0.708
D×LAB	0.000	0.002	0.001	0.695	0.636	0.447
D×cellulase	0.000	0.043	0.818	0.956	0.970	0.191
LAB×cellulase	0.005	0.725	0.058	0.498	0.147	0.079
D×LAB×cellulase	0.000	0.000	0.009	0.045	0.015	0.191

Data are means of the three silage samples.

DM, dry matter; OM, organic matter; CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; ADL, acid detergent lignin; SEM, standard error of mean; LAB, lactic acid bacteria.

Means within columns with different superscript letters differ significantly from each other (p<0.05).

Table 4

Energy of corn stover silage prepared with lactic acid bacteria and cellulase

Items	GE	DE	ME	NEm	NEl	NEg
	------------------------------------------------------------ MJ/kg of DM -----------------------------------------------------
Exposure d means
0	19.70b	11.24d	9.09d	6.24d	5.22d	3.33d
2	20.27c	10.79c	8.73c	5.92c	4.95c	2.99c
4	19.70b	9.94b	8.04b	5.40b	4.51b	2.61b
7	19.73b	9.81b	7.94b	5.31b	4.44b	2.54b
15	20.23c	9.79b	7.90b	5.27b	4.40b	2.46b
30	18.98a	8.30a	6.69a	4.39a	3.67a	1.88a
60	18.91a	8.26a	6.66a	4.36a	3.65a	1.87a
SEM	0.05	0.11	0.09	0.07	0.06	0.06
Additives means
Control	19.68b	9.61a	7.76a	5.18a	4.33a	2.45a
LAB	19.54a	9.59a	7.76a	5.19a	4.34a	2.47a
Cellulase	19.63b	9.91b	8.01b	5.39b	4.51b	2.63b
LAB+cellulase	19.72b	9.81ab	7.93ab	5.32ab	4.44ab	2.55ab
SEM	0.04	0.08	0.07	0.05	0.04	0.04
Significance of main effects and interactions
Exposure d (D)	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
LAB	0.502	0.488	0.520	0.521	0.521	0.527
Cellulase	0.079	0.002	0.002	0.002	0.002	0.004
D×LAB	0.027	0.624	0.708	0.718	0.718	0.725
D×cellulase	0.001	0.693	0.684	0.741	0.741	0.838
LAB×cellulase	0.002	0.596	0.527	0.430	0.430	0.253
D×LAB×cellulase	0.083	0.039	0.052	0.040	0.040	0.020

Data are means of the three silage samples.

DM, dry matter; GE, gross energy; DE, digestible energy; ME, metabolizable energy; NEm, net energy for maintenance; NEl, net energy for lactating cow; NEg, net energy for gain; SEM, standard error of mean; LAB, lactic acid bacteria.

Means within columns with different superscript letters differ significantly from each other (p<0.05).

The fermentation characteristics of corn stover silage pre pared with LAB and cellulase are shown in Table 5. Silages prepared under all treatments were well preserved, with pH values below 4.10. As the field exposure time increased, corn stover silage pH increased significantly (p<0.05), but PA content decreased significantly (p<0.05). The LA and AA contents of corn stover silage were significantly (p<0.05) higher at 0 to 4 d of exposure than at 7 to 60 d of exposure. In LAB, cellulase or LAB+cellulase-treated silages, the pH was lower (p< 0.05), and LA and AA contents were higher (p<0.05) than those of the control, whereas the rates of ammonia-N/total N were not significantly different among treatments. D influenced all fermentation quality parameters (p = 0.000), and LAB treatment influenced LA and AA (p = 0.000). Cellulase treatment influenced pH, LA, AA, and BA (p = 0.000–0.004). D×LAB influenced LA, AA, and BA contents and ammonia-N/TN (p = 0.000). D×cellulase influenced pH and AA (p = 0.000). LAB×cellulase influenced DM and GE (p = 0.005 and 0.002). D×LAB×cellulase influenced LA, AA, PA, and ammonia-N/TN (p = 0.000–0.002).

Table 5

Fermentation quality of corn stover silage prepared with lactic acid bacteria and cellulase

Items	pH	LA	AA	PA	BA	Ammonia-N/TN (%)
		---------------------------------------- % of DM -----------------------------------------
Exposure d means
0	3.59a	8.15d	9.76e	0.87b	0.18e	2.26a
2	3.59a	7.18c	6.68c	0.94b	0.16d	2.37c
4	3.99c	8.07d	8.21d	0.35a	0.12a	1.66a
7	4.00c	6.23b	5.47b	0.25a	0.17de	2.17bc
15	3.85b	5.96b	1.07a	0.13a	0.14bc	2.10bc
30	3.98c	3.59a	1.30a	0.18a	0.13ab	2.29bc
60	4.05d	3.41a	1.58a	0.19a	0.15c	2.06b
SEM	0.01	0.20	0.22	0.09	0.01	0.09
Additives means
Control	3.91c	5.20a	3.66a	0.28a	0.16b	2.17ab
LAB	3.87b	6.19b	5.32bc	0.58b	0.16b	2.25b
Cellulase	3.84a	6.16b	4.87b	0.54b	0.14a	2.10ab
LAB+cellulase	3.84a	6.79c	5.62c	0.27a	0.15b	2.00a
SEM	0.01	0.15	0.17	0.06	0.00	0.07
Significance of main effects and interactions
Exposure d (D)	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
LAB	0.012	0.000	0.000	0.851	0.065	0.889
Cellulase	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.683	0.004	0.022
D×LAB	0.195	0.000	0.000	0.236	0.000	0.000
D×cellulase	0.000	0.062	0.000	0.952	0.045	0.022
LAB×cellulase	0.052	0.229	0.009	0.000	0.015	0.223
D×LAB×cellulase	0.103	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.198	0.002

Data are means of the three silage samples.

LA, lactic acid; AA, acetic acid; PA, propionic acid; BA, butyric acid; TN, total nitrogen; DM, dry matter; SEM, standard error of mean; LAB, lactic acid bacteria.

Means within columns with different superscript letters differ significantly from each other (p<0.05).

The in vitro digestibility of corn stover silage prepared with LAB and cellulase is shown in Table 6. As the field exposure time increased, the IVDMD, IVOMD, IVCPD, and IVGED decreased (p<0.05). The IVDMD and IVCPD levels were higher (p<0.05) in cellulase- and LAB+cellulase-treated silages than in the control and LAB-treated silage. D and cellulase treatment influenced all measures in vitro digestibility (p = 0.000–0.003). D×LAB and D×LAB×cellulase influenced IVCPD (p = 0.004 and 0.000), but LAB and other interactions did not.

Table 6

In vitro digestibility of corn stover silage prepared with lactic acid bacteria and cellulase

Items	IVDMD	IVOMD	IVCPD	IVGED
	----------------------------------------------------------- % of DM ---------------------------------------------------------
Exposure d means
0	50.06d	53.89d	48.21e	52.63d
2	48.72c	51.94c	46.67d	50.85c
4	47.17b	50.84b	46.55d	50.11b
7	46.89b	50.66b	45.75c	50.16b
15	46.76b	50.13b	45.12b	49.83b
30	43.32a	47.77a	43.76a	47.70a
60	43.20a	47.69a	43.94a	47.56a
SEM	0.25	0.26	0.14	0.24
Additives means
Control	46.27a	50.06a	45.54a	49.54a
LAB	46.25a	50.15a	45.51a	49.57a
Cellulase	47.02b	50.91b	45.89b	50.27b
LAB+cellulase	46.81b	50.54ab	45.94b	49.97ab
SEM	0.19	0.20	0.10	0.18
Significance of main effects and interactions
Exposure d (D)	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
LAB	0.522	0.517	0.912	0.447
Cellulase	0.001	0.003	0.000	0.003
D×LAB	0.530	0.596	0.004	0.532
D×cellulase	0.693	0.940	0.957	0.912
LAB×cellulase	0.590	0.276	0.682	0.350
D×LAB×cellulase	0.023	0.018	0.000	0.023

Data are means of the three silage samples.

IVDMD, in vitro dry matter digestibility; IVOMD, in vitro organic matter digestibility; IVCPD, in vitro crude protein digestibility; IVGED, in vitro gross energy digestibility; DM, dry matter; SEM, standard error of mean; LAB, lactic acid bacteria.

Means within columns with different superscript letters differ significantly from each other (p<0.05).

DISCUSSION

Generally, as field exposure time increased, corn stover experienced moisture loss, whereas the proportion of DM increased significantly, and NDF, ADF, and ADL contents increased drastically [17]. These results are consistent with those of our study. We also demonstrated higher levels of NDF, ADF, and ADL components in corn stover, which further resulted in decreased IVDMD and DE, which were negatively correlated with cell wall structural components such as cellulose and lignin.

The WSC and CP content in corn stover also decreased significantly with exposure time (Table 1) due to the loss of feed nutrients, including noncellulosic saccharides. Aerobic spoilage bacteria present in the stover and plant respiration consume nutrients such as proteins and sugars in plants [18]; these processes are important factors contributing to the reduction in DE observed in this study. Sun et al [7] reported that fresh corn stover contained a relatively high LAB count and WSC content, and the resulting silage fermented well, with minimal nutrient loss and improved in vitro digestibility. Usually, fresh stover had a relatively low DM while high WSC content and LAB counts, result in the silage prepared as good quality, but the dry stover did not [7]. In agreement with the previous studies, with increasing field exposure of corn stover, the CP and WSC contents and in vitro digestibility decreased. Therefore, fresh corn stover has suitable ensiling characteristics, and that silage should be prepared immediately after harvesting corn.

Generally, as grasses grow to maturity, DM, NDF, ADF, and ADL levels increase, whereas WSC, CP, and EE levels decrease [19]. Silage material is typically required to contain at least 5% WSC DM for high-quality fermentation. Harvesting and exposure time greatly influence the chemical composition of forage; both WSC and BC contents tended to vary considerably [20], indicating that exposure time may change the chemical composition of the materials and influence silage fermentation quality.

In the current study, the NDF and ADF content was significantly lower in cellulase-treated silage than in control silage because the applied cellulase mainly degraded plant fiber (NDF and ADF) to increase WSC as a substrate for LAB to produce LA and improve silage fermentation [21]. The chemical composition did not differ significantly between silage treated with and without LAB and was similar across treatments at the same exposure time. It is likely that forage corn, including stover, has good ensilage characteristics, such that good silage fermentation preserves nutrients well.

Factors used to assess fermentation quality include the physiological properties of epiphytic LAB and fermentation products. Epiphytic LAB can reduce pH by synthesizing LA, inhibiting the activity of bacteria, fungi or plant enzymes, and decreasing microbial diversity, resulting in improved silage fermentation without the addition of LAB. Thus, good-quality silage fermentation slows the reaction process of protein degradation to form nonprotein nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen and volatile fatty acids, greatly preserving the CP and EE during ensilage [22]. Zhang et al [23] also found that in the anaerobic environment of natural fermentation, the conversion of WSC to LA allowed epiphytic LAB to lower the pH, which is consistent with the results of this experiment.

In cellulase-treated silage, ME and NEm levels were higher than those of the control silage, whereas NDF and ADF contents and the levels of other factors were lower (Table 3). This result demonstrates that cellulase could both reduce indigestible cellulosic materials and improve feed digestion and metabolism. It is worth noting that it could not be used alone in actual production because the CP and effective energy value of corn stover silage were low. Therefore, high-protein and high-energy feeds such as soybean meal, corn or high-quality hay should be used in combination to meet the demand for protein, NEl, and NEg in lactating cows or growing cattle when feeding cows or beef cattle with corn stover silage. In our study, D affected all chemical constituents of corn stover silage; LAB×cellulase did not affect the OM. D×LAB and cellulase treatment affected OM and GE levels. This result suggests that exposure time and the application of additives have a significant impact on material chemical composition and silage fermentation quality.

In all LAB and cellulase-treated silages, the pH was below 4.20 (Table 5), indicating high silage fermentation quality. As the exposure time increased, the LA content gradually decreased due to decreases in moisture and WSC content. However, the PA content of the LAB- or cellulase-treated silage was significantly higher than that of the control silage. The reason for this finding remains unclear; it may be that epiphytic propionibacteria in contact with stover material converted LA to PA and CO2 during ensilage. Future studies should aim to isolate and identify PA-producing bacteria.

The LA and AA content in corn stover silage was significantly higher at 0 to 2 d (Table 5) because the WSC of the silage material was higher at 0 to 2 d of exposure (7.33% to 8.42% DM); WSC was the main substrate for LAB fermentation. Jahanzad et al [24] found that molasses, a source of WSC, can increase the activity of homofermentative LAB and convert WSC to LA.

In the present study, the LA content of LAB+cellulase- treated silage was significantly higher than that of other silage treatments due to the conversion of cellulosic material into monosaccharides by cellulase, which enhanced the growth of LAB. However, at different exposure times, silage treated with LAB, cellulase and LAB+cellulase exhibited no significant differences from the control silage in ammonia-N/TN. This result could be explained by a high abundance of LAB, which can enhance fermentation quality, and by low pH, which inhibits the growth and proteolytic activity of clostridia [25]. During ensilage, clostridia cannot degrade protein to produce ammonia-N; therefore, it is impossible to obtain large quantities of ammonia-N. In this study, exposure time, additives and their interaction affected the pH and organic acid content but did not affect the ammonia-N/TN of silage. Thus, exposure time and additives can influence silage fermentation quality.

High fiber content generally leads to a decline in feed IVD MD [26]. In this study, IVDMD, IVOMD, IVCPD, and IVGED levels of corn stover silage were lower than those of unfermented corn stover due to a significant increase in NDF, ADF, and ADL contents (Table 6). Santos et al [27] found that after fermentation, IVDMD decreased by an average of 21.3% in three sugarcane shoots. Therefore, IVDMD was higher in the cellulase treatment than in the control and LAB treatments. OM digestibility is a key factor reflecting the nutritional intake efficiency and production value potential of animal feed; lignin content is negatively correlated with IVOMD [28] and is considered to be a major factor affecting plant cell wall digestibility [29]. In this study, corn stalk IVDMD and IVOMD decreased significantly as exposure time increased; the corn maturity, stem-to-leaf ratio, and the degree of stover lignification also increased, leading to reduced in vitro digestibility. This result was consistent with that of corn stover silage in our study. As the exposure time was prolonged, the CP content and energy decreased. Rain, sunlight and microbial growth during field exposure may contribute to declines in IVCPD and IVGED.

Exposure time and cellulase affected the in vitro digestibility of corn stover silage; however, the interaction between exposure time and LAB treatment had a significant impact only on IVCPD. Silage fermentation quality depends on the type of microorganisms applied; their growth is affected by two main factors: the exposure time of the microorganisms to the straw and the fermentation additive. The LA production inhibits the effects of other microorganisms. The growth substrate of these microorganisms is mainly protein, such that D×LAB mainly affects IVCPD.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we examined the chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of field-exposed corn stover and the fermentation characteristics of silage prepared using microbial additives. Fresh corn stover had levels of certain nutrients that are characteristic of good ensilage materials. Corn stover generally lost nutrients during exposure. Ensilage preserved nutrients well, and our findings indicate that silage should be prepared using fresh stover. The addition of LAB and cellulase improved fermentation and in vitro digestibility of corn stover silage.