| Literature DB >> 31010860 |
Shichun Lun1, Rokeya Tasneen1, Tridib Chaira2, Jozef Stec3, Oluseye K Onajole4, Tian J Yang5, Christopher B Cooper5, Khisi Mdluli5, Paul J Converse1, Eric L Nuermberger1, V Samuel Raj2, Alan Kozikowski6, William R Bishai7.
Abstract
Indole-2-carboxamide derivatives are inhibitors of MmpL3, the cell wall-associated mycolic acid transporter of Mycobacterium tuberculosis In the present study, we characterized indoleamide effects on bacterial cell morphology and reevaluated pharmacokinetics and in vivo efficacy using an optimized oral formulation. Morphologically, indoleamide-treated M. tuberculosis cells demonstrated significantly higher numbers of dimples near the poles or septum, which may serve as the mechanism of cell death for this bactericidal scaffold. Using the optimized formulation, an expanded-spectrum indoleamide, compound 2, showed significantly improved pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and in vivo efficacy in mouse infection models. In a comparative study, compound 2 showed superior efficacy over compound 3 (NITD-304) in a high-dose aerosol mouse infection model. Since indoleamides are equally active on drug-resistant M. tuberculosis, these findings demonstrate the therapeutic potential of this novel scaffold for the treatment of both drug-susceptible and drug-resistant tuberculosis.Entities:
Keywords: MmpL3 inhibitor; Mycobacterium tuberculosiszzm321990; chemotherapy; indole-2-carboxamide; mouse model; mycolic acid
Year: 2019 PMID: 31010860 PMCID: PMC6591635 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00343-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother ISSN: 0066-4804 Impact factor: 5.191
FIG 1Chemical structures of compound 1 (designated compound 3 in reference 18), compound 2 (designated compound 26 in reference 19), and compound 3 (designated compound NITD-304 in reference 17).
FIG 2Morphological characterization of M. tuberculosis H37Rv after treatment with compound 1 or isoniazid (INH). (A) Untreated control; (B), treated with 1× MIC of compound 1; (C) treated with 10× MIC of compound 1; (D) treated with 10× MIC of INH (control); (E) number of dimples per 100 bacilli counted from three biological replicates. (mean ± SD; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 by Student’s t test).
Single dose pharmacokinetics of compound 2
| Parameter | Values by formulation | |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5% CMC | PG:Tween 80 | |
| 1.25 ± 1.06 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | |
| 0.15 ± 0.04 | 1.04 ± 0.02 | |
| AUClast (h·μg/ml) | 1.51 ± 0.56 | 6.56 ± 0.20 |
| AUCinf (h·μg/ml) | 1.55 ± 0.56 | 9.03 ± 0.26 |
| F (%) | 22 | 96 |
10 mg/kg, p.o.
Data are mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. Tmax, time to maximum concentration of drug in serum. AUCinf, area under the curve extrapolated to infinity.
Lung CFU counts by week of treatment
| Treatment | Values by treatment time point | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | Week 2 | Week 4 | |
| UT | 2.35 (0.19) | 6.76 (0.04) | 7.48 (0.15) |
| E_100 | 3.56 (0.26) | 4.02 (0.28) | |
| E_50 | 4.34 (0.25) | 5.60 (0.24) | |
| 2_50 | 3.40 (NA) | 2.82 (0.34) | |
| 2_25 | 3.79 (0.25) | 5.30 (0.20) | |
| 2_12.5 | 5.31 (0.48) | 6.63 (0.21) | |
| 2_6.25 | 6.65 (0.20) | 7.11 (0.10) | |
All values are mean (±SD).
Significantly different from untreated control (UT) (P < 0.0001).
No standard deviation because of a single value.
FIG 3In vivo activity of compound 2. Gross pathology (A) and weight (B) of lungs after 4 weeks of treatment. Lung weight was compared with untreated control (*P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s posttest).
FIG 4Comparative dose-response curves for compounds 2 and 3 in a high-dose aerosol mouse infection model (P < 0.0001 for comparison of log ED50 by extra sum-of-squares F test).