Mohammad Abufaraj1,2, Fred K Tabung3, Shahrokh F Shariat1,4,5,6, Marco Moschini1,7, Elizabeth Devore8, Kyriaki Papantoniou9, Lin Yang9, Susanne Strohmaier8, Florian Rohrer9, Sarah Coseo Markt10, Xuehong Zhang8, Edward Giovannucci10, Eva Schernhammer9,10,8. 1. Departments of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 2. Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. 3. Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria. 5. Departments of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 6. Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York. 7. Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. 8. Channing Division of Network Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 9. Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 10. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Inflammatory reaction has been linked to bladder cancer. Diet, which drives systemic inflammation, may be considered a modifiable risk factor for bladder cancer. We examined the association of diet with pro-inflammatory potential and bladder cancer risk using the novel EDIP (empirical dietary inflammatory pattern) score comprising predefined food groups determining a pattern most predictive of plasma inflammatory markers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We followed a total of 172,802 women in the NHS (Nurses' Health Study) from 1984 to 2012 and the NHS II from 1991 to 2013 as well as 45,272 men in the HPFS (Health Professionals Follow-Up Study) from 1986 to 2012. Multivariable adjusted Cox regression models were used to estimate the RR and 95% CI of bladder cancer across EDIP score quintiles. We performed inverse variance weighted meta-analysis to pool estimates across cohorts stratified by smoking status. RESULTS: During 4,872,188 person-years of observation 1,042 incident bladder cancer cases were identified. Overall, high EDIP scores reflecting dietary patterns with pro-inflammatory potential were not associated with a higher risk of bladder cancer (quintile 5 vs 1 pooled multivariable adjusted RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.75-1.12, ptrend = 0.67). Results were consistent across individual cohorts (quintile 5 vs 1 in the NHS RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.78-1.37, ptrend = 0.71; in the NHS II RR 1.44, 95% CI 0.53-3.91, ptrend = 0.13; and in the HPFS RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-1.01, ptrend = 0.11). Results were similar regardless of smoking status. CONCLUSIONS: We observed no association between diets with pro-inflammatory potential and bladder cancer risk. Although additional studies are needed to explore other nutritional pathways with the potential for bladder cancer prevention, our results suggest that diets associated with inflammation are not associated with bladder cancer risk.
PURPOSE: Inflammatory reaction has been linked to bladder cancer. Diet, which drives systemic inflammation, may be considered a modifiable risk factor for bladder cancer. We examined the association of diet with pro-inflammatory potential and bladder cancer risk using the novel EDIP (empirical dietary inflammatory pattern) score comprising predefined food groups determining a pattern most predictive of plasma inflammatory markers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We followed a total of 172,802 women in the NHS (Nurses' Health Study) from 1984 to 2012 and the NHS II from 1991 to 2013 as well as 45,272 men in the HPFS (Health Professionals Follow-Up Study) from 1986 to 2012. Multivariable adjusted Cox regression models were used to estimate the RR and 95% CI of bladder cancer across EDIP score quintiles. We performed inverse variance weighted meta-analysis to pool estimates across cohorts stratified by smoking status. RESULTS: During 4,872,188 person-years of observation 1,042 incident bladder cancer cases were identified. Overall, high EDIP scores reflecting dietary patterns with pro-inflammatory potential were not associated with a higher risk of bladder cancer (quintile 5 vs 1 pooled multivariable adjusted RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.75-1.12, ptrend = 0.67). Results were consistent across individual cohorts (quintile 5 vs 1 in the NHS RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.78-1.37, ptrend = 0.71; in the NHS II RR 1.44, 95% CI 0.53-3.91, ptrend = 0.13; and in the HPFS RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-1.01, ptrend = 0.11). Results were similar regardless of smoking status. CONCLUSIONS: We observed no association between diets with pro-inflammatory potential and bladder cancer risk. Although additional studies are needed to explore other nutritional pathways with the potential for bladder cancer prevention, our results suggest that diets associated with inflammation are not associated with bladder cancer risk.
Authors: Mostafa Dianatinasab; Elaheh Forozani; Ali Akbari; Nazanin Azmi; Dariush Bastam; Mohammad Fararouei; Anke Wesselius; Maurice P Zeegres Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Valeria Edefonti; Carlo La Vecchia; Matteo Di Maso; Anna Crispo; Jerry Polesel; Massimo Libra; Maria Parpinel; Diego Serraino; Monica Ferraroni; Francesca Bravi Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Keiichiro Mori; Irene Resch; Noriyoshi Miura; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Victor M Schuettfort; Benjamin Pradere; Satoshi Katayama; David D'Andrea; Mehdi Kardoust Parizi; Mohammad Abufaraj; Wataru Fukuokaya; Claudia Collà Ruvolo; Stefano Luzzago; Sophie Knipper; Carlotta Palumbo; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Alberto Briganti; Dmitry V Enikeev; Morgan Rouprêt; Vitaly Margulis; Shin Egawa; Shahrokh F Shariat Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 6.968